Bartosz Giza wrote: > Another question is why em0 taskq is eating so much cpu ? BGE interface is > actually one that pushes 2 times more packets than em0 and it uses about > half cpu comparing to em0. Is that not strange ? > Could someone tell my why is this happening ? BGE is faster ? or maybe i can > tune some
I have the same problem - em0 taskq eating incredible amounts of CPU. If you find a solution, contact me!
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature