Hi Bartosz Giza!
On Fri, 29 Feb 2008 18:14:34 +0100; Bartosz Giza wrote about 'Re: redirecting
connections based on probability':
> rdr on $int_if inet proto tcp from someip to any port 80 probability 0.1 ->
> mywebserver
What is exactly your task / other rules? Possibly ipfw could this for y
On Mon, Mar 03, 2008 at 11:23:16PM -0600, Mike Silbersack wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, 3 Mar 2008, Fernando Gont wrote:
>
>> At 04:11 a.m. 03/03/2008, Mike Silbersack wrote:
>>
Here's the same patch, but with the first ephemeral port changed from
1024 to 1.
>>>
>>> Now that I've actuall
Am Di, 4.03.2008, 06:44, schrieb Kevin Oberman:
> At a recent networking conference an IPv6 hour took place where IPv6
> only was available. It was an interesting experience. On the whole,
> things worked well, but I hit one problem.
>
> When I brought up my system, I associated with the main conf
Is there a known problem running ah+esp on ip6? I can set up an
association and run ah+esp just fine on ip4,
and ah or esp work well by themselves in ip6, but I've had no luck
with combining them on ip6.
I know that ipcomp is documented to be broken but I haven't seen
anything about this problem.
On Tue, 4 Mar 2008, Cyrus Rahman wrote:
Hi,
Is there a known problem running ah+esp on ip6? I can set up an
association and run ah+esp just fine on ip4,
and ah or esp work well by themselves in ip6, but I've had no luck
with combining them on ip6.
I know that ipcomp is documented to be broken
The following reply was made to PR kern/121274; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: "Sean C. Farley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc:
Subject: Re: kern/121274: [panic] Panic in ether_input() with different
NIC's.
Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2008 13:15:49 -0600 (CST)
Two additional items of in
Synopsis: [mii] [patch] rgephy does not deal with status properly,if BMCR_ISO
is set.
Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-bugs->freebsd-net
Responsible-Changed-By: vwe
Responsible-Changed-When: Tue Mar 4 19:48:05 UTC 2008
Responsible-Changed-Why:
Over to maintainer(s).
http://www.freebsd.org/
On Tue, Mar 04, 2008 at 05:09:14AM -0200, Fernando Gont wrote:
> At 03:23 a.m. 04/03/2008, Mike Silbersack wrote:
>
>> Too optimistic:
>>
>> ! #define IPPORT_EPHEMERALLAST 655535
>>
>> Otherwise the patch looks good to me. It looked a bit strange in unified
>> diff format, I needed to look at
Am Di, 4.03.2008, 22:51, schrieb Freddie Cash:
...
> The lack of a "carpdev" option to directly link a carp device to an
> interface (similar to "vlandev" for vlan(4)) is what's really tripping me
> up. It appears the carp(4) driver looks at all the interfaces in the box
> to find one with an IP
I'm trying to understand how ipfw, vlan, and carp play together.
I've figured out how ipfw and vlan work together and have my rules written
using the vlan(4) interfaces (in recv vlan100; out xmit vlan100; etc).
I've figured out how ipfw and carp work together and have my rules
allowing carp pro
On March 4, 2008 02:20 pm Max Laier wrote:
> Am Di, 4.03.2008, 22:51, schrieb Freddie Cash:
> ...
>
> > The lack of a "carpdev" option to directly link a carp device to an
> > interface (similar to "vlandev" for vlan(4)) is what's really
> > tripping me up. It appears the carp(4) driver looks at a
> > Is there a known problem running ah+esp on ip6? I can set up an
> > association and run ah+esp just fine on ip4,
> > and ah or esp work well by themselves in ip6, but I've had no luck
> > with combining them on ip6.
>
> 22 is EINVAL.
>
> The same error message is there twice in sys/netin
Old Synopsis: New IPSEC & IPV6 & AH+ESP Broken
New Synopsis: [ipsec] New IPSEC & IPV6 & AH+ESP Broken
Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-bugs->freebsd-net
Responsible-Changed-By: linimon
Responsible-Changed-When: Wed Mar 5 00:26:16 UTC 2008
Responsible-Changed-Why:
Over to maintainer(s).
http:
Synopsis: [mii] [patch] rgephy does not deal with status properly,if BMCR_ISO
is set.
Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-net->yongari
Responsible-Changed-By: yongari
Responsible-Changed-When: Wed Mar 5 01:06:35 UTC 2008
Responsible-Changed-Why:
Grab.
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr
Hi list,
Is there any patches or plans to support altq on vlan interfaces ??
Regards,
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Synopsis: [wi] [patch] Add the APDL-325 WLAN pccard to wi(4)
Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-bugs->freebsd-net
Responsible-Changed-By: linimon
Responsible-Changed-When: Wed Mar 5 03:37:41 UTC 2008
Responsible-Changed-Why:
Over to maintainer(s).
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=779
Synopsis: [lge] [patch] Potential memory leak in lge(4)
Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-bugs->freebsd-net
Responsible-Changed-By: linimon
Responsible-Changed-When: Wed Mar 5 03:39:40 UTC 2008
Responsible-Changed-Why:
Over to maintainer(s).
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=78072
__
Synopsis: [lge] [patch] Potential memory leak in lge(4)
Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-net->yongari
Responsible-Changed-By: yongari
Responsible-Changed-When: Wed Mar 5 04:03:50 UTC 2008
Responsible-Changed-Why:
Grab.
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=78072
Synopsis: [ipsec] SP refcnt increases with each packet in ipv6 with new IPSEC
Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-bugs->freebsd-net
Responsible-Changed-By: linimon
Responsible-Changed-When: Wed Mar 5 05:16:41 UTC 2008
Responsible-Changed-Why:
Over to maintainer(s).
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/qu
19 matches
Mail list logo
