On Sun, 17 Feb 2008, Kip Macy wrote:
Hi,
You might want to check out sys/modules/cxgb/tom/Makefile.
ha, so that file is not compiled at all. Thanks for pointing this out.
Is there a reason to keep it in cvs then? I guess there is but it's
not obvious to me;-)
So basically what does that mean
Hi Rui,
On Sun, Feb 17, 2008 at 09:30:44PM +, Rui Paulo wrote:
> Hi,
> The attached patch ports a traceroute functionality from FreeBSD
> called AS path.
> The concept is simple. On each hop we query a whois server to find the
> corresponding hop AS number.
>
> I think it doesn't hurt if
Hello Eygene,
On Sun, Feb 17, 2008 at 08:11:04PM +0300, Eygene Ryabinkin wrote:
> I should more carefully study current OpenBSD CVS: the fix for your
> problem was committed 5 months ago. Claudio mentioned it (and he
> is the author of the patch itself), but the fix didn't get into 4.2.
>
> The
Current FreeBSD problem reports
Critical problems
Serious problems
S Tracker Resp. Description
a kern/38554 netchanging interface ipaddress doesn't seem to work
s kern/39937 netipstealth
Josef, good day.
Mon, Feb 18, 2008 at 11:50:24AM +0100, Josef Pojsl wrote:
> > OK, to the point: the inlined patch should go to the 'files'
> > directory, named 'patch-p2p_interfaces'. I assume that all my
> > previous patches to make 4.2 to compile and run were applied.
>
> Thaks a lot, I have
Synopsis: [tcp] Many old TCP connections in SYN_RCVD state
State-Changed-From-To: feedback->closed
State-Changed-By: remko
State-Changed-When: Mon Feb 18 14:37:34 UTC 2008
State-Changed-Why:
I believe this had been resolved around -RC1 already, at least I dont
see this behaviour at all..
http://
Hello,
I'm using a couple of freebsd boxes for providing pptp vpn services.
Some of them have nearly identical hardware and software configuration.
Others don't (I use amd64 and i386 architectures). But the same problem
is observed on either of them. The problem is that at arbitrary moment
of
Hi.
We recently upgraded some of our machines to 6.3-RELEASE and we have been
plagued by repeatable panics when our multi-cast client applications exit.
Our machines have Intel X5365 processors, LSI MegaSAS 1064R cards, and Intel
Pro 1000 MF nic cards (although we have seen this problem with the o
In response to Nick Barnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I have a multi-home host: more than one IP address. The addresses are
> in separate subnets but run over the same ethernet segment (this is a
> temporary situation while I switch an office network over from one
> network provider to another).
>
>
Bill,
Mon, Feb 18, 2008 at 04:36:18PM -0500, Bill Moran wrote:
> I would suggest you ask yourself (and possibly the list) _why_ you think
> multiple default routes is necessary ... what is it that you're hoping
> to accomplish. I'm guessing your looking for some sort of redundancy,
> in which cas
Nick, good day.
Mon, Feb 18, 2008 at 09:00:54PM +, Nick Barnes wrote:
> I have a multi-home host: more than one IP address. The addresses are
> in separate subnets but run over the same ethernet segment (this is a
> temporary situation while I switch an office network over from one
> network
Synopsis: [sis] if_sis short cable fix problems with NetGear FA311's
Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-bugs->freebsd-net
Responsible-Changed-By: linimon
Responsible-Changed-When: Mon Feb 18 21:45:18 UTC 2008
Responsible-Changed-Why:
Assign to -net. Note: submitter has provided some feedback.
I have a multi-home host: more than one IP address. The addresses are
in separate subnets but run over the same ethernet segment (this is a
temporary situation while I switch an office network over from one
network provider to another).
I want packets from address A1 to be sent via gateway G1, bu
On Feb 18, 2008, at 3:00 PM, Nick Barnes wrote:
I have a multi-home host: more than one IP address. The addresses are
in separate subnets but run over the same ethernet segment (this is a
temporary situation while I switch an office network over from one
network provider to another).
I want p
Nick Barnes wrote:
I have a multi-home host: more than one IP address. The addresses are
in separate subnets but run over the same ethernet segment (this is a
temporary situation while I switch an office network over from one
network provider to another).
I want packets from address A1 to be se
Nick Barnes wrote:
At 2008-02-18 21:36:18+, Bill Moran writes:
In response to Nick Barnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
I have a multi-home host: more than one IP address. The addresses are
in separate subnets but run over the same ethernet segment (this is a
temporary situation while I switch an
Bill Moran wrote:
In response to Eygene Ryabinkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Bill,
Mon, Feb 18, 2008 at 04:36:18PM -0500, Bill Moran wrote:
I would suggest you ask yourself (and possibly the list) _why_ you think
multiple default routes is necessary ... what is it that you're hoping
to accomplish.
Nick Barnes wrote:
At 2008-02-18 21:36:18+, Bill Moran writes:
I would rather send packets from the P2 subnet addresses to the P2
router, while the packets from the P1 subnet addresses keep going to
the P1 router.
Apparently I can do this with some IPFW cunning, but that seems like
overk
At 2008-02-18 22:12:48+, Julian Elischer writes:
> Unless you actually want all your machines to be remotely
> accessible from the outside, you should probably just turn on
> NAT on the new ISP interface, turn off the old one, and be
> done with it.
The machines I'm interested in for these pu
At 2008-02-18 21:36:18+, Bill Moran writes:
> In response to Nick Barnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> > I have a multi-home host: more than one IP address. The addresses are
> > in separate subnets but run over the same ethernet segment (this is a
> > temporary situation while I switch an office
In response to Eygene Ryabinkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Bill,
>
> Mon, Feb 18, 2008 at 04:36:18PM -0500, Bill Moran wrote:
> > I would suggest you ask yourself (and possibly the list) _why_ you think
> > multiple default routes is necessary ... what is it that you're hoping
> > to accomplish. I'm
Mon, Feb 18, 2008 at 05:06:42PM -0500, Bill Moran wrote:
> > I had faced such situation once: I had multihomed host that was
> > running Apache daemon that was announced via two DNS names that
> > were corresponding to two different IPs, going via two different
> > providers. When the first provid
In response to Tom Judge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Bill Moran wrote:
> > In response to Eygene Ryabinkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >
> >> Bill,
> >>
> >> Mon, Feb 18, 2008 at 04:36:18PM -0500, Bill Moran wrote:
> >>> I would suggest you ask yourself (and possibly the list) _why_ you think
> >>> multipl
Nick Barnes wrote:
At 2008-02-18 22:12:48+, Julian Elischer writes:
Unless you actually want all your machines to be remotely
accessible from the outside, you should probably just turn on
NAT on the new ISP interface, turn off the old one, and be
done with it.
The machines I'm interested
In response to Eygene Ryabinkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Mon, Feb 18, 2008 at 05:06:42PM -0500, Bill Moran wrote:
> > > I had faced such situation once: I had multihomed host that was
> > > running Apache daemon that was announced via two DNS names that
> > > were corresponding to two different IPs,
Bill,
Mon, Feb 18, 2008 at 05:54:33PM -0500, Bill Moran wrote:
> > > I can be done with CARP
> > > if both providers support it and are willing to work together.
> >
> > Very, very unlikely for me ;))
>
> Overall, Eygene, you're tryi
The following reply was made to PR kern/64556; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Thomas Hurst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Volker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: kern/64556: [sis] if_sis short cable fix problems with NetGear
FA311's
Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2008 00:03:12 +
Eygene Ryabinkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Thanks for the education! I have only one question: what it 'Yugo'?
> I had not found it in nearby dictionaries ;))
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yugo
--
Bill Moran
Collaborative Fusion Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Phone: 412-422-3463x4023
On Tue, Feb 19, 2008 at 12:10:03AM +, Thomas Hurst wrote:
> The following reply was made to PR kern/64556; it has been noted by GNATS.
>
> From: Thomas Hurst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: Volker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: kern/64556: [sis] if_sis short cable f
The following reply was made to PR kern/64556; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Thomas Hurst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Volker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: kern/64556: [sis] if_sis short cable fix problems with NetGear
FA311's
Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2008 02:04:34 +
* Pyun YongHyeon ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> I thought nsphyter(4) may handle PHY hardware but ukphy(4) was used.
> Just curious, would you let me know OUI/MII model/revision number of
> PHY?(ukphy(4) prints that information in verbosed boot.)
ukphy0: PHY 0 on miibus0
ukphy0: OUI 0x080017, mode
On Tue, Feb 19, 2008 at 02:13:15AM +, Thomas Hurst wrote:
> * Pyun YongHyeon ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>
> > I thought nsphyter(4) may handle PHY hardware but ukphy(4) was used.
> > Just curious, would you let me know OUI/MII model/revision number of
> > PHY?(ukphy(4) prints that informa
Si vous ne lisez pas cet email en HTML, allez sur
[1]http://www.arawak-marketing.com/cinecheque
Participez à notre formation référencement sur Google
Augmentez vos ventes en ligne
Générez de nouveaux contacts
[2]Différenciez vous de vos concurrents
[3]P
[1][sign.gif]
_
You've got cash
[pxl.gif]
Greetings from [2]moneybookers.com! We would like to inform you that
you have received a payment from [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[3][logo.gif]
[
34 matches
Mail list logo
