"Sepherosa Ziehau" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Are you also using freebsd as STA too? If yes, would you have time to
> gather following information on the STA side before after and during
> the rsyncing:
> 1) wlandebug -i sta_iface +input
> 2) tcpdump -ni sta_iface -y ieee802_11 -w dump.bin
I'l
Max Khon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Have you tried to turn off bgscan?
bgscan is obviously not running since the broken ral is in the AP.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smørgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.or
On Jan 4, 2008 4:51 PM, Dag-Erling Smørgrav <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "Sepherosa Ziehau" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Are you also using freebsd as STA too? If yes, would you have time to
> > gather following information on the STA side before after and during
> > the rsyncing:
> > 1) wlande
On Jan 4, 2008 4:51 PM, Dag-Erling Smørgrav <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "Sepherosa Ziehau" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Are you also using freebsd as STA too? If yes, would you have time to
> > gather following information on the STA side before after and during
> > the rsyncing:
> > 1) wlande
On Fri, Dec 28, 2007 at 03:51:31PM -0800, Tiffany Snyder wrote:
> Hi Andre,
> are those numbers for small (64 bytes) packets? Good job on pushing
> the base numbers higher on the same HW.
>
> What piqued my attention was the note that our forwarding
> performance doesn't scale with
Anyone up for adding text to the scopeid field in the ifconfig(8)
output for IPv6 addresses? Other OSes do. To avoid too much
disruption to the current format, the text is appended after the
currently printed hexadecimal field.
Example:
fxp0: flags=8843 mtu 1500
options=8
inet6 fe
just for giggles i un-hacked the mtus and ran for an hour with no
one using the wireless
soek0.psg.com:/root# netstat -i
NameMtu Network Address Ipkts IerrsOpkts Oerrs Coll
vr01500 00:00:24:c8:b3:2819022 016015 0 0
vr11500 00:00:2
i applied the patch from
http://vanhu.free.fr/FreeBSD/patch-natt-freebsd6-2007-05-31.diff to get
nat-t working with my racoon set up.
Do I need 'option IPSEC_NAT_T' in my kernel or will it automatically be
built?
The reason I ask is when I apply the patch.. i sucessfully do a 'make
buildword' but