On Fri, Dec 28, 2007 at 03:51:31PM -0800, Tiffany Snyder wrote: > Hi Andre, > are those numbers for small (64 bytes) packets? Good job on pushing > the base numbers higher on the same HW. > > What piqued my attention was the note that our forwarding > performance doesn't scale with multiple CPUs. Which means there's a lot of > work to be done :-) Have we taken a look at OpenSolaris' Surya > (http://www.opensolaris.org/os/community/networking/surya-design.pdf) > project? They allow multiple readers/single writer on the radix_node_head > (and not a mutex as we do) and we may be able to do the same to gain some > parallelism. There are other things in Surya that exploit multiple CPUs. > It's definitely worth a read. DragonFlyBSD seems to achieve parallelism by > classifying packet as flows and then redirecting the flows to different > CPUs. OpenSolaris also does something similar. We can definitely think along > those lines. > > NOTE: > 1) I said multiple instead of dual CPUs on purpose. > 2) I mentioned OpenSolaris and DragonFlyBSD as examples and to acknowledge > the work they are doing and to show that FreeBSD is far behind and is losing > it's lustre on continuing to be the networking platform of choice.
A very good paper worth reading about all this by Paul Willmann, Scott Rixner and Alan Cox: An Evaluation of Network Stack Parallelism Strategies in Modern Operating Systems http://www.ece.rice.edu/~willmann/pubs/paranet_tr06-872.pdf -- Jeremie Le Hen < jeremie at le-hen dot org >< ttz at chchile dot org > _______________________________________________ freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
