Anybody running VLANs over tl(4) or nve(4)?

2007-05-02 Thread Yar Tikhiy
Hi folks, There two network interface drivers that have uncertain VLAN_MTU support status, namely nve(4) and tl(4). The nve(4) driver has a sign of unfinished VLAN_MTU support in it as it forgets to set the respective bit in if_capenable; and tl(4) was told to support long frames, but its driver

Unix friendly network testbench for FreeBSD?

2007-05-02 Thread youshi10
Hi, I'm looking for a network testbench / simulator to stimulate known networking conditions to test out a component for a product at work. I was wondering if there was a network simulator available (preferably open source) that's FreeBSD / Linux compatible which I can simulate as real

Re: Unix friendly network testbench for FreeBSD?

2007-05-02 Thread Chuck Swiger
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I'm looking for a network testbench / simulator to stimulate known networking conditions to test out a component for a product at work. I was wondering if there was a network simulator available (preferably open source) that's FreeBSD / Linux compatible wh

[PATCH] hw.bge.fake_autoneg removal for bge(4)

2007-05-02 Thread Jung-uk Kim
I think I have found a way to get rid of infamous 'hw.bge.fake_autoneg' tunable for BCM5704S. The patch works for me but I'd like to see more test results in various environments. If you have one of those BCM5704S (fiber) and set 'hw.bge.fake_autoneg="1"' in your /boot/loader.conf, please tes

[PATCH] DMA R/W control for bge(4)

2007-05-02 Thread Jung-uk Kim
This is a patch to correct DMA rwad/write control register settings. Actually it is all started from kern/96806: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=96806 BCM5714C works now but we have some remaining patch in the PR. Please test the patch and let me know if it breaks anything. Thanks

panic: mtx_lock() of destroyed mutex @ ../../../net/route.c:1306

2007-05-02 Thread Kris Kennaway
One of my 7.0 systems has a flaky gateway, and when it goes down the node often goes down with this panic: panic: mtx_lock() of destroyed mutex @ ../../../net/route.c:1306 cpuid = 0 KDB: enter: panic [thread pid 28619 tid 100074 ] Stopped at kdb_enter+0x68: ta %xcc, 1 db> wh Trac

Re: Unix friendly network testbench for FreeBSD?

2007-05-02 Thread youshi10
On Wed, 2 May 2007, Chuck Swiger wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I'm looking for a network testbench / simulator to stimulate known networking conditions to test out a component for a product at work. I was wondering if there was a network simulator available (preferably open so

Re: Unix friendly network testbench for FreeBSD?

2007-05-02 Thread Marko Zec
On Wednesday 02 May 2007 23:40:35 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On Wed, 2 May 2007, Chuck Swiger wrote: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >> Hi, > >> I'm looking for a network testbench / simulator to stimulate > >> known networking conditions to test out a component for a product > >> at work. I wa

Re: Unix friendly network testbench for FreeBSD?

2007-05-02 Thread youshi10
On Thu, 3 May 2007, Marko Zec wrote: On Wednesday 02 May 2007 23:40:35 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, 2 May 2007, Chuck Swiger wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I'm looking for a network testbench / simulator to stimulate known networking conditions to test out a component for a prod

Re: Unix friendly network testbench for FreeBSD?

2007-05-02 Thread Julian Elischer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, 3 May 2007, Marko Zec wrote: On Wednesday 02 May 2007 23:40:35 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, 2 May 2007, Chuck Swiger wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I'm looking for a network testbench / simulator to stimulate known networking conditions to test

Re: Unix friendly network testbench for FreeBSD?

2007-05-02 Thread youshi10
On Wed, 2 May 2007, Julian Elischer wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, 3 May 2007, Marko Zec wrote: On Wednesday 02 May 2007 23:40:35 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, 2 May 2007, Chuck Swiger wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I'm looking for a network testbench / simulator to s

Re: Unix friendly network testbench for FreeBSD?

2007-05-02 Thread Julian Elischer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'd go with 4.11 or wait the extra month or so.. That's true, but unfortunately... a) 7-CURRENT isn't production quality, but it's getting closer all the time. b) I need to start work soon, sometime within the next few weeks at the latest. I should have thought abou

Re: Unix friendly network testbench for FreeBSD?

2007-05-02 Thread Wilkinson, Alex
0n Wed, May 02, 2007 at 09:48:52AM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >Hi, > I'm looking for a network testbench / simulator to stimulate known > networking conditions to test out a component for a product at work. > I was wondering if there was a network simulator a

UDP checksums in ICMP quotes

2007-05-02 Thread Matthew Luckie
At the moment, freebsd checks a UDP checksum in place, overwriting whatever is there. This has a side effect of the ICMP code sending back the first eight bytes of the UDP payload with 2 bytes different to what that system sent. For example: listening on lo0, link-type NULL (BSD loopback), captu

Re: Unix friendly network testbench for FreeBSD?

2007-05-02 Thread Garrett Cooper
Julian Elischer wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'd go with 4.11 or wait the extra month or so.. That's true, but unfortunately... a) 7-CURRENT isn't production quality, but it's getting closer all the time. b) I need to start work soon, sometime within the next few weeks at the latest. I