Julian Elischer wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd go with 4.11 or wait the extra month or so..
That's true, but unfortunately...
a) 7-CURRENT isn't production quality, but it's getting closer all the
time.
b) I need to start work soon, sometime within the next few weeks at
the latest. I should have thought about this earlier, but it was just
posed as a thought to me friday.
4.11 is definitly production quality..
It won't make it into 7.0. I'm pretty sure.
WHen 7-x branches this may go into head.. that puts it a feature in 8.0
Why do you want to use 7.0?
of course there is always multiple Xen/vmware/whatever machines.
I didn't suggest that I wanted to use 7-CURRENT for production releases.
That's entirely based on the devs responses.
I'll give the 4.11 release a shot, but I don't like using 4.x because
the SMP quality and 64-bit capability is lower than of 5.x and 6.x, and
the majority of these tests need to be done with 64-bit capability since
all of the machines will be Core2Duo+ capable (and thinking ahead), Quad
core+ enabled.
-Garrett
_______________________________________________
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
