Re: Throughput problems with dummynet and high delays

2006-10-31 Thread Randall Stewart
Andy: Hi, you must be working with Injong :-) At one point I was playing with dummynet in satellite networks. One of the KEY problems I found is that the number of packets you can have in queue, limited to 100, was not nearly enough. This was (at the time) a hardcoded parameter inside both the i

RE: Virtual Network Interfaces

2006-10-31 Thread Raymond Wagner
I was expecting replies to come back from freebsd-net@freebsd.org, so I didn't see your response until now. I want to keep the two networks separate, so I don't want to bridge the internal and external directly. Besides, since I have more machines than available IPs, I would have to assign the int

Re: Throughput problems with dummynet and high delays

2006-10-31 Thread Pieter de Boer
Andy Jones wrote: What happens is as the TCP window grows larger (about 3-4MB), the sender spends most of its time processing interrupts (80-90% as reported by top) and throughput peaks at about 300Mbps. I've dug into the dummynet code and I've found that a large amount of time is spent in the

Re: New em driver

2006-10-31 Thread Nikolay Pavlov
On Saturday, 28 October 2006 at 10:10:26 -0700, Jack Vogel wrote: > On 10/28/06, Nikolay Pavlov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >On Friday, 27 October 2006 at 18:44:37 -0700, Jack Vogel wrote: > >> After a conference call today, it was decided that a merge of > >> my Intel driver base and the STABLE c

Re: New em driver

2006-10-31 Thread Ronald Klop
On Sat, 28 Oct 2006 03:44:37 +0200, Jack Vogel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: After a conference call today, it was decided that a merge of my Intel driver base and the STABLE code would take place. This code undoes the INTR_FAST/taskqueue approach for right now. Work will continue to get that to w

Where is IPSec NAT-T support?

2006-10-31 Thread Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET
>From Larry: > >> I'm interesting FAST_IPSEC support:-). > > > > if Larry or someone else have quickly some time to do it, please let > > me know. > > > > If no one else port that (it shouldn't be too difficult, but takes > > some time), I'll do it "ASAP". > I'll make the time. Should

Re: PPP IPv6 prefix length and stateless autoconfiguration?

2006-10-31 Thread JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
(sorry for the delayed response, been busy for a while...) > On Tue, 17 Oct 2006 10:03:05 -0700, > "Krejsa, Dan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > This appears to make the autoconfiguration work fine, and I > encountered no other connectivity issues in brief testing; > but a coworker of mine n