(sorry for the delayed response, been busy for a while...)
>>>>> On Tue, 17 Oct 2006 10:03:05 -0700,
>>>>> "Krejsa, Dan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> This appears to make the autoconfiguration work fine, and I
> encountered no other connectivity issues in brief testing;
> but a coworker of mine noticed that ifconfig no longer showed
> the destination address, and I investigated and found the
> 128-bit enforcement in in6_update_ifa(). This makes me somewhat
> nervous; but if configuring a PPP/IPv6 interface without an
> IPv6 destination address is the intended method of use,
> I'd be more comfortable with this. Is that the standard
> way of doing things?
I don't know in which sense you mean "standard", but in any event,
it's an implementation specific decision (not required by a protocol
specification). I believe it's at least doesn't break any protocol
standard, or cause a problem in operation (except incompatibility with
an application or operation that has a different assumption as you
saw).
JINMEI, Tatuya
Communication Platform Lab.
Corporate R&D Center, Toshiba Corp.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_______________________________________________
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
