Re: CARP broken in 6.1

2006-05-26 Thread Jan Zorz
On Thursday 25 of May 2006 17:17, dima wrote: > Assigning an IP address to a CARP interface leads to the new route table > entry: UH 0 0 carp0 > > and such error in /var/log/messages: > arp_rtrequest: bad gateway (!AF_LINK) > > Removing the entry manually seems to fix the issue. But I can't ping

Re[2]: CARP broken in 6.1

2006-05-26 Thread dima
> On Thursday 25 of May 2006 17:17, dima wrote: >> Assigning an IP address to a CARP interface leads to the new route table >> entry: UH 0 0 carp0 >> >> and such error in /var/log/messages: >> arp_rtrequest: bad gateway (!AF_LINK) >> >> Removing the entry manually seems to fix the issue. But I c

Re: CARP broken in 6.1

2006-05-26 Thread Jan Zorz
> > On which interface you try to setup carp? Fiber, copper, which brand? > > em(4), copper. Does it matter? Yup. For me works well on em (copper), but not at all on em (fiber). Patch is on it's way... (somewhere). /jan ___ freebsd-net@freebsd.org

Locking fixes for ef(4) - testers needed

2006-05-26 Thread Wojciech A. Koszek
Hello, Here is a patch for ef(4) which adds some locking: http://freebsd.czest.pl/dunstan/FreeBSD/if_ef.1.patch It's known to be not entirely right, but could be commited to improve current situation of ef(4). Testers are welcome. Thanks, -- Wojciech A. Koszek [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://

Re: CARP broken in 6.1

2006-05-26 Thread Scott Ullrich
On 5/26/06, Jan Zorz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On which interface you try to setup carp? Fiber, copper, which brand? > > em(4), copper. Does it matter? Yup. For me works well on em (copper), but not at all on em (fiber). Patch is on it's way... (somewhere). /jan Until they hit the tree

Netgraph: Ethernet interfaces missing from persistent node list

2006-05-26 Thread benjamin
Using ngctl as suggested in the "All About Netgraph" Daemon News article (http://people.freebsd.org/~julian/netgraph.html ) by Archie Cobbs I get the following output: [EMAIL PROTECTED] nghook -a fxp0: divert nghook: can't connect to node [EMAIL PROTECTED] ngctl list There are 1 total nodes: Na

Netgraph: Ethernet interfaces missing from persistent node list

2006-05-26 Thread benjamin
My bad ... I forgot to do . Here they are: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ngctl list There are 5 total nodes: Name: ngctl4476 Type: socket ID: 000d Num hooks: 0 Name: sis1Type: ether ID: 000b Num hooks: 0 Name: sis0Type: ether

TCP checksum

2006-05-26 Thread Amit Mondal
Hi, Could anyone pls tell me the function freebsd provides for calculating TCP checksum. What I am doing, I am sniffing packet using divert packet and changing the destination address of the packet. Now, since TCP checksum calculation include Pseudo head (src dest IP ) I need to recalculate

Re: Netgraph: Ethernet interfaces missing from persistent node list

2006-05-26 Thread Julian Elischer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Using ngctl as suggested in the "All About Netgraph" Daemon News article (http://people.freebsd.org/~julian/netgraph.html ) by Archie Cobbs I get the following output: [EMAIL PROTECTED] nghook -a fxp0: divert nghook: can't connect to node [EMAIL PROTECTED] ngctl list T

Re: TCP checksum

2006-05-26 Thread Julian Elischer
Amit Mondal wrote: Hi, Could anyone pls tell me the function freebsd provides for calculating TCP checksum. What I am doing, I am sniffing packet using divert packet and changing the destination address of the packet. Now, since TCP checksum calculation include Pseudo head (src dest IP ...

How to force full sync using pfsync?

2006-05-26 Thread David DeSimone
I have a strange problem between two PF firewalls in a cluster, with pfsync enabled. When I reboot one of the cluster members, the state tables do synchronize and populate with some of the same connection states, but not all of them. In particular, long-lived, extant connections seem to never sho

"Private" MAC Addresses

2006-05-26 Thread Michael Jeung
Hi folks, I'm interested in assigning a bunch of virtual MAC addresses on my network but I want to make sure that I'm not conflicting with MAC addresses that are already out there. (I've already taken a look at this nice resource: http:// www.cavebear.com/CaveBear/Ethernet/vendor.html) A

Re: "Private" MAC Addresses

2006-05-26 Thread Bjoern A. Zeeb
On Fri, 26 May 2006, Michael Jeung wrote: Hi folks, I'm interested in assigning a bunch of virtual MAC addresses on my network but I want to make sure that I'm not conflicting with MAC addresses that are already out there. (I've already taken a look at this nice resource: http://www.cavebe