Hi all,
is it possible to somehow obtain a list of nodes of a specific type without
root privileges?
Background: I need this in order to do autodetection of hci nodes (port of
kde-bluetooth and new libhci) from a regular user account.
Thanks for your time,
Markus
--
Markus Brueffer | GPG
sfp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is it possible to disable a driver compiled into a 4.10 kernel at
> boot time by feeding a (set?) command to the loader?
>
> In this case I want to turf the EM(4) driver that was compiled into
> the kernel I've inherited and substitute it with a new if_em.ko us
I have the configuration at home:
notebook with iwi(4) - ZyXel AP - 100Mb switch - desktopPC(s)
When I boot my notebook it's not available outside - from desktopPC. But
when I do ping (or any network activity) from notebook, everything
starts work.
Any comments?
PS. It's CURRENT a week ago age a
Sergey Matveychuk wrote:
> I have the configuration at home:
> notebook with iwi(4) - ZyXel AP - 100Mb switch - desktopPC(s)
>
> When I boot my notebook it's not available outside - from desktopPC. But
> when I do ping (or any network activity) from notebook, everything
> starts work.
>
> Any com
> On Mon, 08 May 2006 05:44:51 +0900 (JST),
> Hideki Yamamoto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> I wonder if IPv6 raw socket can be used only for ICMPv6.
No, you can use any non built-in protocols on an IPv6 raw socket. In
fact, IPv6 PIM daemons use IPv6 raw sockets for IPPROTO_PIM. But...
>
any other solution?
can i solve it with static routing?
- Original Message -
From: "Charles Swiger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "OxY" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc:
Sent: Tuesday, May 16, 2006 1:10 AM
Subject: Re: changing default route
On May 15, 2006, at 7:04 PM, OxY wrote:
have two interface
OxY wrote:
> hi!
>
> i have a little irregular problem with default route..
> here are the details:
>
> have two interfaces with the same ip, em0 connected to another server with
> crosslink,
> em1 is the public, can be reached from the internet connected to a switch.
>
> em0: flags=8843 mtu 1
OxY <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> any other solution?
> can i solve it with static routing?
You cannot have the same IP address on different interfaces
(connected to different networks) at the same time.
Why do you think that you must use the same IP address?
Just use a different IP (and/or diff
On Tue, 16 May 2006 15:53:38 +0200
"OxY" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> any other solution?
> can i solve it with static routing?
Create a bridge interface, assign both the nics as it's members and
assign the IP to it.
Marcin.
> - Original Message -
> From: "Charles Swiger" <[EMAIL PROTE
but bridging needs ipfw (or pf) and with heavy traffic
it needs lots of cpu.
- Original Message -
From: "Marcin Jessa" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "OxY" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc:
Sent: Tuesday, May 16, 2006 4:31 PM
Subject: Re: changing default route
On Tue, 16 May 2006 15:53:38 +0200
"Ox
On Tue, 2006-05-16 at 01:04 +0200, OxY wrote:
> hi!
>
> i have a little irregular problem with default route..
> here are the details:
>
> have two interfaces with the same ip, em0 connected to another server with
> crosslink,
> em1 is the public, can be reached from the internet connected to a
On Tue, 16 May 2006 16:42:23 +0200
"OxY" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> but bridging needs ipfw (or pf) and with heavy traffic
> it needs lots of cpu.
No, bridging does not need any firewalling.
Run something like:
ifconfig bridge0 create
ifconfig bridge0 addm em0 addm em1
ifconfig bridge0 inet 12.
Hi.
You're right, net.link.bridge.ipfw must be set to 1 to enable layer2
filtering. Anyway, divert still doesn't work.
Thanks!
Carlos
Andrew Thompson wrote:
On Tue, May 09, 2006 at 05:45:02PM -0300, Carlos E Gaspar wrote:
Hi.
I have the following setup:
FreeBSD abc5.5-PRERELEASE FreeBS
%cat /etc/motd
FreeBSD 6.1-STABLE (GENERIC) #3: Tue May 9 19:36:33 PDT 2006
Problem #1 (yesterday):
May 15 16:05:30 ns named[398]: client 66.80.0.9#1075: error sending
response: not enough free resources
May 15 16:05:38 ns last message repeated 2 times
May 15 16:05:39 ns named[398]: client 66
Sergey Matveychuk wrote:
Sergey Matveychuk wrote:
I have the configuration at home:
notebook with iwi(4) - ZyXel AP - 100Mb switch - desktopPC(s)
When I boot my notebook it's not available outside - from desktopPC. But
when I do ping (or any network activity) from notebook, everything
starts wo
Darren Pilgrim wrote:
> Sergey Matveychuk wrote:
>> Sergey Matveychuk wrote:
>>> I have the configuration at home:
>>> notebook with iwi(4) - ZyXel AP - 100Mb switch - desktopPC(s)
>>>
>>> When I boot my notebook it's not available outside - from desktopPC. But
>>> when I do ping (or any network ac
Markus Brueffer wrote:
Hi all,
is it possible to somehow obtain a list of nodes of a specific type without
root privileges?
Background: I need this in order to do autodetection of hci nodes (port of
kde-bluetooth and new libhci) from a regular user account.
Thanks for your time,
Markus
Sergey Matveychuk wrote:
Darren Pilgrim wrote:
Sergey Matveychuk wrote:
Sergey Matveychuk wrote:
When I boot my notebook it's not available outside - from desktopPC. But
when I do ping (or any network activity) from notebook, everything
starts work.
Oh, forgot to say, AP is in BSS network-m
Markus Brueffer wrote:
Hi all,
is it possible to somehow obtain a list of nodes of a specific type without
root privileges?
nope
Background: I need this in order to do autodetection of hci nodes (port of
kde-bluetooth and new libhci) from a regular user account.
err... i added this to blu
Am Tuesday 16 May 2006 20:55 schrieb Maksim Yevmenkin:
> > Background: I need this in order to do autodetection of hci nodes (port
> > of kde-bluetooth and new libhci) from a regular user account.
>
> err... i added this to bluetooth hci sockets and it has been sitting in
> my tree forever. please
Hello,
I have 2 servers with both 2x 'em' interfaces in it.
I configged a /31 on both interfaces
em0 in box 1 = 10.0.0.1
em0 in box 2 = 10.0.0.2
both connected with a crossed cable.
But I can't ping from box1 to box2 or reverse.
So now my question:
Is it not possible to set a /31 on FreeBSD ?
I'm
Unix-Solutions - Steven wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have 2 servers with both 2x 'em' interfaces in it.
> I configged a /31 on both interfaces
> em0 in box 1 = 10.0.0.1
> em0 in box 2 = 10.0.0.2
That's not a /31, it's the middle two addresses of a /30 (as the end of your
message correctly surmised). Her
Unix-Solutions - Steven wrote this message on Wed, May 17, 2006 at 02:10 +0200:
> I have 2 servers with both 2x 'em' interfaces in it.
> I configged a /31 on both interfaces
> em0 in box 1 = 10.0.0.1
> em0 in box 2 = 10.0.0.2
As someone else mentioned even if you did a /31, those addresses aren't
/31 is common practice today. You don't need broadcast on a point-to-point link.
The only broadcast you need is ARP and that's on layer 2.
Baldur
On Tue, May 16, 2006 at 05:55:46PM -0700, John-Mark Gurney wrote:
> Unix-Solutions - Steven wrote this message on Wed, May 17, 2006 at 02:10
> +0200:
A /31 is not a point-to-point link. A /32 is. A /31 is a network
with nothing
but a loopback and broadcast address. You have to go to a /30 to
have a block
of addresses that is useful or configure a point-to-point link where
you specify
the address at each end of the link.
Kim
On May 16
- Original Message -
From: "Kim Shrier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Unix-Solutions - Steven" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc:
Sent: Wednesday, May 17, 2006 9:20 AM
Subject: Re: /31 on 2 interfaces
A /31 is not a point-to-point link.
see RFC 3021
A /31 is a network with nothing but a loopback
From: "Oliver Fromme" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> sfp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Is it possible to disable a driver compiled into a 4.10 kernel at
> > boot time by feeding a (set?) command to the loader?
> >
> > In this case I want to turf the EM(4) driver that was compiled into
> > the kernel
27 matches
Mail list logo
