Hi guys.
I am looking for solution I could implement on a link with a huge latency when
ping replies can go up to a few hundred miliseconds, e.g sateliete links.
What I was thinking about is some kind of virtual interface which could
translate tcp to udp in one of the pears of the link and push
Marcin,
What is it you are trying to accomplish and/or solve here? Switching between
UDP and TCP isn't going to have much impact on your problem if it is a function
of a lower network layer.
In a case where you have a questionable connection, TCP is really what you
want, because UDP has a
On Thu, 16 Jun 2005 02:35:27 -0700
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Marcin,
>
> What is it you are trying to accomplish and/or solve here? Switching
> between
> UDP and TCP isn't going to have much impact on your problem if it is a
> function
> of a lower network layer.
>
> In a case where yo
Julian Elischer wrote:
Being able to remove interfaces would be really great. Then I could
create extra logging interfaces in each vimage and not worry about
the cleanup nightmare afterwards. Right now, I have a lot of script
code just to find and reuse old ngeth interfaces sitting around in the
On Wed, 15 Jun 2005, Marcel Moolenaar wrote:
On Jun 15, 2005, at 1:42 PM, Daniel Hartmeier wrote:
If I understand the problem correctly, there is an underlying
network-generic question I'd like to ask here.
When a function in the kernel gets passed a struct ip pointer, can it
assume that the s
On Wed, 2005-06-15 at 11:45 +0200, Marcin Jessa wrote:
> I am looking for solution I could implement on a link with a huge latency
> when ping replies can go up to a few hundred miliseconds, e.g sateliete links.
> What I was thinking about is some kind of virtual interface which could
> translate
On Thu, 16 Jun 2005, Daniel Hartmeier wrote:
'packed', as I understand it, prohibits the compiler from inserting any
padding anywhere in the struct. That is, it guarantees that the total
size of a struct object equals the sum of the sizes of its members.
It also requires the complier to genera
On Thu, 16 Jun 2005 05:37:18 -0700
Frank Mayhar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 2005-06-15 at 11:45 +0200, Marcin Jessa wrote:
> > I am looking for solution I could implement on a link with a huge latency
> > when ping replies can go up to a few hundred miliseconds, e.g sateliete
> > links.
Hello i want to know how can the www user listen on the port 80 rather than
root or what is the the step or commade to take that allow the www user
listen on port 80
i'm tryin to run my webserver (aolserver)for www from root but i keep the
message cannot listen to port 80 permission denied.
Ple
> On Thu, 16 Jun 2005 05:37:18 -0700
> Frank Mayhar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 2005-06-15 at 11:45 +0200, Marcin Jessa wrote:
>> > I am looking for solution I could implement on a link with a huge
>> latency when ping replies can go up to a few hundred miliseconds, e.g
>> sateliete lin
On Wed, Jun 15, 2005 at 02:32:19PM -0400, Josh Kayse wrote:
> On 6/15/05, Gleb Smirnoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > AFAIU, you use PLIP line as some flag that triggers suppression. If
> > slave "sees" master via PLIP, it keeps itself in slave mode. May be
> > I don't understand you right.
>
>
> I'm fairly sure that you are out of kernel virtual memory.
> Look at kern/kern_malloc.c kmeminit (); you can play w/ VM_KMEM_SIZE_MAX
> or TUNABLE_INT_FETCH("kern.vm.kmem.size", &vm_kmem_size);
>
> /*
> * Try to auto-tune the kernel memory size, so that it is
> * mo
On 6/16/05, Mrad James Deane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello i want to know how can the www user listen on the port 80 rather than
> root or what is the the step or commade to take that allow the www user
> listen on port 80
> i'm tryin to run my webserver (aolserver)for www from root but i keep
Hi,
At 13:47 16/06/2005, Marcin Jessa wrote:
On Thu, 16 Jun 2005 05:37:18 -0700
Frank Mayhar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> You want SCPS (the Space Communications Protocols Specification)
> software. Briefly, it fakes local TCP on either end while talking its
> own protocol over the high-late
Yet another complex question regarding vimage/netgraph :-)
I'm trying to use the ppp program to do PPPoE on an ngeth interface
without much
luck. I'm using the following Netgraph tree setup:
upper---link0
[fxp0] [ng_bridge] link2---ds [ng_vlan] vlan101--- ether
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[DO NOT reply to random messages to post on new topics. I nearly missed
this message.]
On Thu, Jun 16, 2005 at 10:06:01AM +0400, Andrey Smagin wrote:
> Hi ALL,
>
>panic: vr0f0: BUG: if_attach called without if_alloc'd input()
>
> Kernel panic after load, since about week in current.
> B
On Thu, 16 Jun 2005, dragonfly dragonfly wrote:
Recently i did a LVS FreeBSD port, and released 0.4.0 version
(http://dragon.linux-vs.org/~dragonfly/htm/lvs_freebsd.htm). It supports
LVS/DR and LVS/TUN with all LVS schedulers. Thanks must go to Clement
Laforet for committing it to ports/ne
Marcin Jessa wrote:
> Frank Mayhar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
...
>> You want SCPS (the Space Communications Protocols Specification)
>> software. Briefly, it fakes local TCP on either end while talking
>> its own protocol over the high-latency link. I don't know if there
>> is any open-source p
Daniel Hartmeier wrote this message on Thu, Jun 16, 2005 at 00:34 +0200:
> So, are you really sure we should do differently in pf, instead of
> looking for a bridge problem, where bridge constructs an mbuf with the
> IP header not properly aligned?
>
> I.e. if the IP header is properly aligned wit
I use FreeBSD 4.9. Actually I had to _reduce_ VM_KMEM_SIZE in order to
be able to create that much mnbclusters ...
Somehow it seems that vm_kmem_size cannot go over 1GB without crashing
the system so I had to reduce memory map from other subsystems in order
to get what I needed for network mem
Hello.
I have two FreeBSD 4.11 boxes which have been using freevrrpd for a long
time. Today I upgraded from 0.8.7 to 0.9.3 and since then I started
having some problems.
Specifically I started to see this messages on both boxes:
freevrrpd[822]: ip ttl of vrrp packet isn't set to 255. Packet
> I want to just dump all the packets between two satelite links
> without checking for ack back and forth which creates latency and
> long ping times.
The latency is created by the satellite transmission delay, not by the
ack. ACK suffer from the latency, but do not create it.
> Correct. That's
Hello Brooks,
Thursday, June 16, 2005, 8:51:14 PM, you wrote:
BD> [DO NOT reply to random messages to post on new topics. I nearly missed
BD> this message.]
BD> On Thu, Jun 16, 2005 at 10:06:01AM +0400, Andrey Smagin wrote:
>> Hi ALL,
>>
>>panic: vr0f0: BUG: if_attach called without if_all
23 matches
Mail list logo
