netgraph and high availability(bonding) problem

2004-09-10 Thread amendola maurizio
Hi at all I have some problem to configure two network card in high availabilty mode. I have done many test with some configurations but I desn't work. I have Freebsd 5.2.1 and I have also add a patch realized from Evgeny Dolgopiat about ng_one2many.c and ng_one2many.h. Test n.1 (with 2 cards on s

Networking/Security Question...

2004-09-10 Thread Dan
Hello. My first post here, Hope you're all well and enjoying the summer. Okay, this is likely to be an extremely exhaustive post, so I'd really be grateful if you could spare the time to read and reply please... Let me first introduce you to the scenario. We are a not for profit organisation that

Re: uma_zcreate() call from kern_mbuf.c - bug?

2004-09-10 Thread Dima Dorfman
Brian Somers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Of course m_get() et. al. seem to manage to get MSIZE aligned pointers back > from uma_zalloc_arg(zone_mbuf...) anyway, but surely that's an implementation > side effect and the align argument should be corrected. This change looks right to me, but I'm har

Re: uma_zcreate() call from kern_mbuf.c - bug?

2004-09-10 Thread Brian Somers
> Brian Somers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Of course m_get() et. al. seem to manage to get MSIZE aligned pointers >> back >> from uma_zalloc_arg(zone_mbuf...) anyway, but surely that's an >> implementation >> side effect and the align argument should be corrected. > > This change looks right to m

Re: VoIP and IPFW

2004-09-10 Thread Michael W. Oliver
On 2004-09-08T16:29:50-0400, Forrest Aldrich wrote: > Hi there, > > I'm considering testing the Vonage service, with my FreeBSD-4.10 system > (maybe 5 or 6). > > I wonder if anyone here has a configuration they can share, or if there > are any pages out there that detail the proper (and secur

original interface name? (5.*)

2004-09-10 Thread Valentin Nechayev
Hi, is there a stable way to determine original interface name (before any renaming) in 5.3? I.e. as driver + sequence number? -netch- ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To unsubscribe, send any mail

Re: original interface name? (5.*)

2004-09-10 Thread Max Laier
On Friday 10 September 2004 21:18, Valentin Nechayev wrote: > Hi, > is there a stable way to determine original interface name (before > any renaming) in 5.3? I.e. as driver + sequence number? From inside the kernel you can use ifnet.if_dname + ifnet.if_dunit, from the userland I don't know if it

Re: original interface name? (5.*)

2004-09-10 Thread Brooks Davis
On Fri, Sep 10, 2004 at 10:18:31PM +0300, Valentin Nechayev wrote: > Hi, > is there a stable way to determine original interface name (before > any renaming) in 5.3? I.e. as driver + sequence number? What do you want it for and where do you want it? I think there were plans to export if_dname and

Re: original interface name? (5.*)

2004-09-10 Thread Brooks Davis
On Fri, Sep 10, 2004 at 09:30:11PM +0200, Max Laier wrote: > On Friday 10 September 2004 21:18, Valentin Nechayev wrote: > > Hi, > > is there a stable way to determine original interface name (before > > any renaming) in 5.3? I.e. as driver + sequence number? > > From inside the kernel you can use

Re: original interface name? (5.*)

2004-09-10 Thread Valentin Nechayev
Fri, Sep 10, 2004 at 21:30:11, max wrote about "Re: original interface name? (5.*)": >> Hi, >> is there a stable way to determine original interface name (before >> any renaming) in 5.3? I.e. as driver + sequence number? > From inside the kernel you can use ifnet.if_dname + ifnet.if_dunit, from

dyn buckets

2004-09-10 Thread Glenn Dawson
I have a firewall running 4.10 that handles around 20mbits/sec of traffic and has around 500 ipfw rules. Lately I've noticed that net.inet.ip.fw.curr_dyn_buckets seems to be maxing out. I've increased net.inet.ip.fw.dyn_buckets a few times, but they seem to max out each time. Is there any pro

RE: dyn buckets

2004-09-10 Thread Don Bowman
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > I have a firewall running 4.10 that handles around > 20mbits/sec of traffic > and has around 500 ipfw rules. > > Lately I've noticed that net.inet.ip.fw.curr_dyn_buckets > seems to be maxing > out. I've increased net.inet.ip.fw.dyn_buckets a few times, > but they se

Re: original interface name? (5.*)

2004-09-10 Thread Brooks Davis
On Fri, Sep 10, 2004 at 10:46:42PM +0300, Valentin Nechayev wrote: > Fri, Sep 10, 2004 at 21:30:11, max wrote about "Re: original interface name? > (5.*)": > > >> Hi, > >> is there a stable way to determine original interface name (before > >> any renaming) in 5.3? I.e. as driver + sequence num

Re: original interface name? (5.*)

2004-09-10 Thread Valentin Nechayev
Fri, Sep 10, 2004 at 12:58:26, brooks wrote about "Re: original interface name? (5.*)": >> Device number among with driver name are enough to determine needed >> information based on driver information and boot logs. >> It is pointless to use interface without such information, and it is pointl

Re: original interface name? (5.*)

2004-09-10 Thread Andre Oppermann
Brooks Davis wrote: > I'm considering adding an ifconfig -v option that would imply -m and add > more details like index, epoch, dname, dunit, etc. That would be great! -- Andre ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listin

Re: original interface name? (5.*)

2004-09-10 Thread Garrett Wollman
< said: > Brooks Davis wrote: >> I'm considering adding an ifconfig -v option that would imply -m and add >> more details like index, epoch, dname, dunit, etc. > That would be great! A particularly relevant feature would give `ifconfig' an option to emit the current configuration of the interfac

Re: [TEST/REVIEW] Netflow implementation

2004-09-10 Thread Clark Gaylord
Gleb Smirnoff wrote: Dumping to SQL is a bad idea. I have tried it, too :) Certainly dumping to MySQL is typically wretched ... to a real database much less so. --ckg ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-n

Re: [TEST/REVIEW] Netflow implementation

2004-09-10 Thread Bill Fumerola
On Fri, Sep 10, 2004 at 05:32:22PM -0400, Clark Gaylord wrote: > Certainly dumping to MySQL is typically wretched ... to a real database > much less so. works just fine if you aggregate the flows and build lookup tables instead of just dumping raw flows straight into a database. i think it's gre

packet generator

2004-09-10 Thread Andrew Gallatin
Does anybody have a free, in-kernel tool to generate packets quicky and send them out a particular etherent interface on FreeBSD? Something similar to pktgen on linux? I'm trying to excersize just the send-side of programmable firmware based NIC. The recieve side of the NIC firmware is not yet w

Re: packet generator

2004-09-10 Thread Andre Oppermann
Andrew Gallatin wrote: > > Does anybody have a free, in-kernel tool to generate packets quicky > and send them out a particular etherent interface on FreeBSD? > Something similar to pktgen on linux? > > I'm trying to excersize just the send-side of programmable firmware > based NIC. The recieve

Re: packet generator

2004-09-10 Thread Julian Elischer
yes ther e is a netgraph source ng_source from memory.. Andrew Gallatin wrote: Does anybody have a free, in-kernel tool to generate packets quicky and send them out a particular etherent interface on FreeBSD? Something similar to pktgen on linux? I'm trying to excersize just the send-side of progra

RE: packet generator

2004-09-10 Thread Don Bowman
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Andrew Gallatin > Sent: September 10, 2004 19:08 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: packet generator > > Does anybody have a free, in-kernel tool to generate packets quicky > and send them out a particular etherent interface on FreeB