Fri, Sep 10, 2004 at 12:58:26, brooks wrote about "Re: original interface name? (5.*)":
>> Device number among with driver name are enough to determine needed >> information based on driver information and boot logs. >> It is pointless to use interface without such information, and it is pointless >> to do manual logging as the only source. > This is a better reason, but if you want the logs to make sense, you > will have to be aware of changes. Hmm, we may want to log(9) renames. > I'm considering adding an ifconfig -v option that would imply -m and add > more details like index, epoch, dname, dunit, etc. Well, both ideas (logging renames and a switch to print more info) are highly pleasant. Thanks in advance for implementation. -netch- _______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
