Re: freevrrp problem

2004-05-12 Thread Sebastien Petit
Hi Tom, There is a problem with freevrrpd and em drivers. em driver go down,wait 2 seconds, and become up again when an SIOCIFLLADDR is used. So a flapping problem will appear. The last revision in CVS resolve this problem and a new parameter called carrier_timeout (see the man with the new revisi

Re: freevrrp problem

2004-05-12 Thread Eugene Grosbein
> Do you have filtering turned on/are you allowing multicast out to > the VRRP address? I'm a bit perplexed with "interface em0 is faulty". I What do you mean speaking abount 'allowing multicast out'? I'm having troubles with em0 and multicasts too (this time with RIPv2), can't mak

[SOLVED] Re: em(4) link flapping

2004-05-12 Thread Eugene Grosbein
> >>>I tried to replace a cable, to reset the switch, to reboot this > >>>4.9-STABLE > >>>box - nothing helps. What should I try next? > >>Did you tried another port on a switch? > >Yes, I tried several. No change. All other ports of switch > >carry 100Mbit links fine. > Try to plug it to another

Re: [4.9-R]Can I Make My DSL Connect Go Faster ? (OSX nat hint)

2004-05-12 Thread Darcy Buskermolen
On May 4, 2004 11:50 am, Chuck Swiger wrote: > The Jetman wrote: > [ ... ] > > > Wes: I've used a couple of Internet speed tests, at different times, > > but always w/ the same configs. Neither config has been modified. All > > of the results are the same. I use ADSLGuide and DLSReports as

em driver losing packets

2004-05-12 Thread Scott T. Smith
I have a Sun 1U server with 2 built in Intel Pro/1000 "LOMs" (though I had the exact same problem with a previous machine using a standalone Intel NIC). I notice that after the machine has been up for 12-20 hours, the network card starts dropping packets. Here is the relevant dmesg info: em0: p

Re: freevrrp problem

2004-05-12 Thread Tom Arnold
On Wed, May 12, 2004 at 12:30:26PM +0200, Sebastien Petit wrote: > There is a problem with freevrrpd and em drivers. em driver go down,wait 2 > seconds, and become up again when an SIOCIFLLADDR is used. So a flapping > problem will appear. The last revision in CVS resolve this problem and a new > p

multiple conection to internet

2004-05-12 Thread Muhammad Reza
Dear BSD'ers Can freebsd routing kernel handle multiple provider (multipath gateway) ? without BGP ? Now I have a (new ) ADSL, and T1 connection to different provider, my LAN is nat-ing behind freebsd router, I want some people in my network to connect to internet via ADSL and some people

Re: [4.9-R]Can I Make My DSL Connect Go Faster ? (OSX nat hint)

2004-05-12 Thread kazaa-remove
Darcy Buskermolen wrote: I know this option isn't valid in FreeBSD's natd and I'm not sure if perhaps it is handleded transparently. But with out this option under OSX I saw simular problems as to what you are describing when natting packets, even though the same download form the gateway were

Re: multiple conection to internet

2004-05-12 Thread Bruce M Simpson
On Thu, May 13, 2004 at 08:56:24AM +0700, Muhammad Reza wrote: > I want some people in my network to connect to internet via ADSL and some > people via T1, based on their IP. > They said , i can do that with linux iproute tools, but i dont want to > replace my FreeBSD-4.9Stable router with Li