On Thu, Mar 18, 2004 at 01:12:22PM -0500, Chuck Swiger wrote:
> Juan Rodriguez Hervella wrote:
> >If I do a bridge between xl0 and xl1, can the IP address
> >configured on xl1 answer ARP-requests that come from the
> >LAN the xl0 is connected ? Does this make sense ?
>
> Yes, it should. Bridging
On Thu, Mar 18, 2004 at 05:12:03PM +0100, Juan Rodriguez Hervella wrote:
> What this is used for ?
>
This is an extension to the ARP proxying feature, allowing you to easily
set it up. Normally, to do an ARP proxying, you would need to set up all
individual ARP proxy entries (see the arp(8) manpa
Hello Suzuki,
Do you know how to use packet filter (BSD Packet filter) like netfilter in
linux?
I would appreciate if you give me some links or reference.
Many thanks in advance,
fuhua
From: SUZUKI Shinsuke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subj
On Wed, 17 Mar 2004, Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
GS>So I have proposed a different approach, and ru liked it. What will
GS>you say about it?
GS>
GS>Two new fields in struct ng_type are introduced:
GS>- u_int32_t family, a generic node type. All current nodes have this field
GS> as 0, they have no simila
On Fri, Mar 19, 2004 at 12:13:37PM +0100, Harti Brandt wrote:
H> It would be nice if it would be possible to classify a node to belong to
H> more than one family. I think, that the functionality provided by the
H> family stuff is more like the 'interface' stuff in Java. One example where
H> this ca
On Fri, 19 Mar 2004, Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
GS>On Fri, Mar 19, 2004 at 12:13:37PM +0100, Harti Brandt wrote:
GS>H> It would be nice if it would be possible to classify a node to belong to
GS>H> more than one family. I think, that the functionality provided by the
GS>H> family stuff is more like the
On Fri, Mar 19, 2004 at 02:24:47PM +0100, Harti Brandt wrote:
H> From the point of code duplication and extendibility both approaches are
H> equivalent. In the second case you have the same three lines in the rcvmsg
H> function of every node that supports a given familiy (this is reduceable
H> to 1
> On Wed, 10 Mar 2004 08:50:22 +0100,
> toni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> i'm trying to set up a FreeBSD 5.2 with trunking with 11 vlan interfaces
> to advertise ipv6 prefixes in an ipv6 native network
> my purpose is that vlan interfaces will configure their address from the
> prefix adv
On Fri, Mar 19, 2004 at 02:54:37AM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I have set up a FreeBSD (5.2.1-RELEASE) box acting as a gateway and
> running version 8.3.7-REL of BIND. For testing purposes my
> configuration file looks as follows:
>
> options {
> directory "/etc/namedb";
> pid-file "/var
Hi,
I was sucessfully running FBSD 4.8 with X509 certicate VPN.
After installation of FBSD 4.9 I get the following error messages:
isakmp.c:899:isakmp_ph1begin_r(): begin Identity Protection mode.
ERROR: ipsec_doi.c:1318:get_transform(): Only a single transform payload is
allowed
Hi there,
On Fri, Mar 19, 2004 at 03:22:07PM +1100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I have posted this question before, but I don't think I made myself very clear
> in what I was hoping to achieve. Hopefully, this post will help out.
>
> I have a situation where I have one network inte
Hi:
Recently I installed FreeBSD 5.1 (on a P4 Xeon at 2.4GHz 1GB RAM) and it worked fine
except that from one subnet (Remote Access, attached to a Computone RAS 2000), so I
can't access to any services of the server (ssh or telnet, this one's just for tests).
The ping respond ok in both directi
12 matches
Mail list logo
