В ср, 04.02.2004, в 03:17, Julian Elischer пишет:
> here's a suggestion..
> I have not done this but it might work:
I have tried such scheme (second, with two divert sockets, tee not
necessary). It works, only thing you should care about - packet should
not enter to this chain twice or kernel will
On Tue, 3 Feb 2004, Brooks Davis wrote:
> Bruce pointed out that if_withname is inconsistent about IFNAMSIZ. I
> was looking at it and cleaned it up, but then I realized that it is a
> really inefficient implementation of ifnet_byindex(sdl->sdl_index). It
> turns out that it's also completely un
On Tue, Feb 03, 2004 at 11:29:24PM +0200, Andriy Korud wrote:
> Thanks, but I'm looking for some solution that'd allow me to modify TOS of the
> packets that match some filter rule, so I think I have to modify ipfilter
> code.
Have you looked at ALTQ, which is part of KAME ( http://www.kame.net )?
Save yourself some headache then and don't get another rl.. As it says in the driver's
source, it really redefines the meaning of 'low end'. It's dirt cheap, and you get
what you pay for..
M
> -Original Message-
> From: Sumit Shah [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: den 4 februari 2004 0
Cytowanie Craig Rodrigues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Tue, Feb 03, 2004 at 11:29:24PM +0200, Andriy Korud wrote:
> > Thanks, but I'm looking for some solution that'd allow me to modify TOS of
> the
> > packets that match some filter rule, so I think I have to modify ipfilter
> > code.
>
> Have you
Hi,
> On Wed, 4 Feb 2004 19:39:06 +1100 (EST)
> Bruce Evans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Bruce pointed out that if_withname is inconsistent about IFNAMSIZ. I
> was looking at it and cleaned it up, but then I realized that it is a
> really inefficient implementation of ifnet_byindex(sdl->s
Is there a, hopefully simple, way to divide bidirectional traffic
(LAN/INTERNET)between 2 internet connections more or less as the diagram below.
I've just added a DSL connection with a lot more bandwidth than my ds0. I want
to use the ds0 exclusively for email and DNS that I consider, in my case,
On Wed, 4 Feb 2004, Dominik Lupinski wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 04, 2004 at 11:04:52AM +0300, Vladimir B. Grebenschikov wrote:
> > ? ??, 04.02.2004, ? 03:17, Julian Elischer ?:
>
> > > here's a suggestion..
> > > I have not done this but it might work:
> >
> > I have tried such scheme (second, w
Hi,
I tried that before and couldn't get it working :(
Then I asked the Kame peps and it seems that ipcomp
is not supported yet in tunnel mode. That was for
FreeBSD 4.8 and I don't think it has changed since then.
Karim.
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PRO
