On Wed, 4 Feb 2004, Dominik Lupinski wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 04, 2004 at 11:04:52AM +0300, Vladimir B. Grebenschikov wrote: > > ? ??, 04.02.2004, ? 03:17, Julian Elischer ?????: > > > > here's a suggestion.. > > > I have not done this but it might work: > > > > I have tried such scheme (second, with two divert sockets, tee not > > necessary). It works, only thing you should care about - packet should > > not enter to this chain twice or kernel will panic. > > Thanks, both of you, for the input. Seems like I found the proper way for > dealing with ip packets in the stack. (Yes, I also think that tee node was > redundant in the second example). yeah the tee node was a cut-n-paste error :-) > > > ps: > > change action for ipfw2 will be funny enough, like: > > ipfw add X change iptos congestion .... > > ipfw add Y change src-ip 1.1.1.1 ... > > may be it is not bad feature for ipfw2 ? > > At least it's high time to have such thing natively in FreeBSD... > > -- > "...they build you up only to tear you down." > _______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
