Re: ADSL PPoA or RFC1483, any solutions ?

2003-10-06 Thread Harti Brandt
On Sat, 4 Oct 2003, Bruce M Simpson wrote: BMS>On Thu, Oct 02, 2003 at 09:53:08AM +0200, Harti Brandt wrote: BMS>> Does PPPoA really need signalling? I tried to find any pointers to PPPoA BMS>> specification, but this seems to be not easy to find. BMS> BMS>I was probably half asleep when I wrote t

Support for RFC2991/RFC2992 in freeBSD

2003-10-06 Thread Ivan Boule
I would like to know which freeBSD release includes support for RFC2991/RFC2992 (multipath routing). More globally, it there a place where valuable information such as "list of supported RFCs" is available for every freeBSD release? Thanks in advance, Ivan Ivan Boule <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> We

Re: Support for RFC2991/RFC2992 in freeBSD

2003-10-06 Thread Bruce M Simpson
On Mon, Oct 06, 2003 at 03:45:10PM +0200, Ivan Boule wrote: > I would like to know which freeBSD release includes support > for RFC2991/RFC2992 (multipath routing). None of them do, yet. I'd like this, but there are too many other things we have to fix first; Sam's work has to be finished, for one

Linking interfaces and system variables

2003-10-06 Thread Dambielle Yannick
Hello everybody, I have 2 questions. Firslty, is there a way to "link" interfaces by using some system variables like the one I can use for bridging interfaces ? i.e. sysctl net.link.ether.bridge_cfg=rl0,rl1. Then, according to the freebsd handbook it exist almost 500 system variables which can be

Current problem reports assigned to you

2003-10-06 Thread FreeBSD bugmaster
Current FreeBSD problem reports Critical problems Serious problems Non-critical problems S Submitted Tracker Resp. Description --- o [2002/05/04] kern/37761 net process exits but socket is still ESTAB

4.8-R: problem when tcp.recvspace=56K (default)

2003-10-06 Thread Carl Mascott
FreeBSD 4.8-R kernel.GENERIC user ppp P II - 400 128 MB RAM 56K ext. modem, 45.3K connection Something in the socket/proto/network interface area doesn't work correctly when tcp.recvspace=56K, the default value in 4.8-R. It DOES work correctly when tcp.recvspace= 16K, 32K, 48K. I see the followin