Hi,
Is somebody already taking efforts to include the OpenBSD enc device in
FreeBSD? If not, I would like to give it a try.
Peter
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to
On Saturday 06 September 2003 20:29, Bruce M Simpson wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 04, 2003 at 10:54:12AM +0200, Juan Rodriguez Hervella wrote:
> > [snipped]
> > gre0: flags=b051 mtu 1476
> > inet 192.168.1.1 --> 192.168.2.1 netmask 0xff00
> > inet6 fe80::2c0:26ff:fea3:5df6%gre0 prefixle
Hi all,
Ive now hit a barrier I just cant cross without help. Theres nothing out on
the net and every where I go they point to this newsgroup / mailing list.
Here it goes...
I have setup MPD to be best of my ability and am getting intermitant packet
loss (only with mpd, pinging through when not c
Hi all,
Ive now hit a barrier I just cant cross without help. Theres nothing out on
the net and every where I go they point to this newsgroup / mailing list.
Here it goes...
I have setup MPD to be best of my ability and am getting intermitant packet
loss (only with mpd, pinging through when not c
Luigi Rizzo writes:
> On Fri, Sep 05, 2003 at 04:47:22PM -0400, Andrew Gallatin wrote:
> >
> > I've been reading a little about TCP Segmentation Offload (aka TSO).
> > We don't appear to support it, but at least 2 of our supported nics
> > (e1000 and bge) apparently could support it.
>
>
Hi everyone,
We're facing a problem where users(clients) are abusing our wireless
network to build VPNs... No known AP has the ability to stop them the
way they're doing this - adding 2nd ip to the nic attached to their AP.
The solution: Build a hostap and packet filter their traffic.
Hi everyone,
We're facing a problem where users(clients) are abusing our wireless
network to build VPNs... No known AP has the ability to stop them the
way they're doing this - adding 2nd ip to the nic attached to their AP.
The solution: Build a hostap and packet filter their traffic.
Hi everyone,
We're facing a problem where users(clients) are abusing our wireless
network to build VPNs... No known AP has the ability to stop them the
way they're doing this - adding 2nd ip to the nic attached to their AP.
The solution: Build a hostap and packet filter their traffic.
> Doesn't turning on WEP and MAC addressing filtering stop them from
> associating with your AP?
That's the problem Jeffrey: No. They're our real Internet clients. No
problems with it.
The problem is that the add a second ip to their nic and use the
physical WLAN to build a VPN. The AP has
Current FreeBSD problem reports
Critical problems
Serious problems
Non-critical problems
S Submitted Tracker Resp. Description
---
o [2002/05/04] kern/37761 net process exits but socket is still ESTAB
On Fri, 5 Sep 2003, Vincent Jardin wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> > contact me..
> >
> > what is teredo?
>
> I have been working with Konstantin about it.
> It is an IPv6 over UDP/IPv4 migration service. It is supported by Windows XP +
> SP1 + Microsoft update. It can be used in order to cross some NATs
Hello,
I'm currently and successfully using MPD 3.13 on a 4.7p9 box as PPTP
RAS for a bunch of Win2K/XP clients.
I'ld know if it is possible to authenticate such users against a Win2K
mixed mode domain (NTLM and/or LDAP) instead of manually maintaing a
mpd.secret file.
Something like Squid does u
Dear Hackers,
After a very long delay (sorry!) I'm pleased to announce that I'm still around
and new a snapshot can be downloaded from
http://www.geocities.com/m_evmenkin/ngbt-fbsd-20030908.tar.gz
Here is quick summary:
o ng_hci(4) and ng_l2cap(4) kernel modules were changed to fix
Thus spake Alessandro de Manzano ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [08/09/03 15:31]:
> I'm currently and successfully using MPD 3.13 on a 4.7p9 box as PPTP
> RAS for a bunch of Win2K/XP clients.
>
> I'ld know if it is possible to authenticate such users against a Win2K
> mixed mode domain (NTLM and/or LDAP) ins
On Mon, 8 Sep 2003, Maksim Yevmenkin wrote:
> Dear Hackers,
>
> After a very long delay (sorry!) I'm pleased to announce that I'm still around
> and new a snapshot can be downloaded from
>
> http://www.geocities.com/m_evmenkin/ngbt-fbsd-20030908.tar.gz
Max,
many
Hi,
If I create two ipfw rules with the same ID:
ipfw add 00022 deny ip from x to y
ipfw add 00022 allow ip from z to b
they will both be there, and both work ... but is it possible to remove
just one of them wihout removing the other ? Right now I am doing a hack
with a ";"
ipfw del 00022 ;
16 matches
Mail list logo