> Yes, and I know why the restriction is in RFC 1884 and it
> is a reasonable restriction.
I don't think so, IP source address is easy to forge and it does not
add any meaning protection. DNSSEC is the only way if you want trusted
responsees. therefore, i agr
> Yes, and I know why the restriction is in RFC 1884 and it
> is a reasonable restriction.
I don't think so, IP source address is easy to forge and it does not
add any meaning protection. DNSSEC is the only way if you want trusted
responsees. therefore, i agr
> On Mon, 23 Sep 2002 12:54:35 +0900,
> Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>> Yes, and I know why the restriction is in RFC 1884 and it
>> is a reasonable restriction.
> I don't think so, IP source address is easy to forge and it does not
> add any meaning pr
>>> Yes, and I know why the restriction is in RFC 1884 and it
>>> is a reasonable restriction.
>> I don't think so, IP source address is easy to forge and it does not
>> add any meaning protection. DNSSEC is the only way if you want trusted
>> responsees. therefore, i agree with e
> > Yes, and I know why the restriction is in RFC 1884 and it
> > is a reasonable restriction.
>
> I don't think so,
Are you saying we should source packets from the anycast address?
If not you should quote better.
> IP source address is easy to forge and it
