>>>>> On Mon, 23 Sep 2002 12:54:35 +0900, 
>>>>> Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:

>> Yes, and I know why the restriction is in RFC 1884 and it
>> is a reasonable restriction.

>       I don't think so, IP source address is easy to forge and it does not
>       add any meaning protection.  DNSSEC is the only way if you want trusted
>       responsees.  therefore, i agree with enabling RES_INSECURE1 by default.

Please let me check.  Mark said the restriction was reasonable, and he
didn't say checking the source address of a DNS response provide
better security.  In my understanding his main opinion is effects and
compatibility against existing applications.

                                        JINMEI, Tatuya
                                        Communication Platform Lab.
                                        Corporate R&D Center, Toshiba Corp.
                                        [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message

Reply via email to