>>>>> On Mon, 23 Sep 2002 12:54:35 +0900, >>>>> Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>> Yes, and I know why the restriction is in RFC 1884 and it >> is a reasonable restriction. > I don't think so, IP source address is easy to forge and it does not > add any meaning protection. DNSSEC is the only way if you want trusted > responsees. therefore, i agree with enabling RES_INSECURE1 by default. Please let me check. Mark said the restriction was reasonable, and he didn't say checking the source address of a DNS response provide better security. In my understanding his main opinion is effects and compatibility against existing applications. JINMEI, Tatuya Communication Platform Lab. Corporate R&D Center, Toshiba Corp. [EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message