> > This said, do you have any reference or docs on the exact meaning
> > of the various IFF_* flags, so we can give a sweep at the code
> > and try to make things consistent and possibly centralised --
> > e.g. should we move the check for IFF_UP|IFF_RUNNING to IF_ENQUEUE
> > (or whatever it is
On Sat, 2 Feb 2002 13:13:53 -0800 (PST), Archie Cobbs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
> David Gilbert writes:
>
> > I'm using mpd-netgraph to attempt to connect an encrypted tunnel.
> > It appears to connect (according to the messages), but the
> > following is spit out for most packets I try to put
I never solved my problem. Since I control both ends, and there's no
packet loss, I'm currently running ppp over ssh.
Dave.
--
|David Gilbert, Velocet Communications. | Two things can only be |
|Mail:
Matthew Braithwaite writes:
> > > [vpn] LCP: rec'd Protocol Reject #1 link 0 (Opened)
> > > [vpn] LCP: protocol 0x0029 was rejected
> > > [vpn] LCP: rec'd Protocol Reject #2 link 0 (Opened)
> > > [vpn] LCP: protocol 0x00a1 was rejected
> >
> > This is usually because one side is sending encrypted
Hi,
I want to use multiple NICs on the same subnet.
Thats my setup:
FreeBSD 4.5-STABLE (updated 2-3 weeks ago, no 4.6-PRERELEASE yet),
3 NICs inside: 2 x 3com 905C-TX, 1 x D-Link DGE-500SX (Level 1
Gigabit).
Now I want to assign a couple of IP addresses to those NICs. All
IP addresses are on t
On Thu, 9 May 2002, Daniel Lang wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I want to use multiple NICs on the same subnet.
> Thats my setup:
>
> FreeBSD 4.5-STABLE (updated 2-3 weeks ago, no 4.6-PRERELEASE yet),
> 3 NICs inside: 2 x 3com 905C-TX, 1 x D-Link DGE-500SX (Level 1
> Gigabit).
>
> Now I want to assign a cou
On Thu, 9 May 2002 13:15:27 -0700 (PDT), Archie Cobbs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
> It may be that compression is actually not being negotiated
> properly, even though the link is staying up. Can you send me an mpd
> log trace?
Do you need more debugging turned on than this?
Note: right now I
[ note: removing -stable from the CC: list ]
Matthew Braithwaite writes:
> [vpn] LCP: rec'd Configure Request #250 link 0 (Ack-Rcvd)
> MRU 1500
> ACCMAP 0x000a
> AUTHPROTO CHAP MSOFTv2
> MAGICNUM 43a911e1
> PROTOCOMP
> ACFCOMP
> [vpn] LCP: SendConfigAck #250
> MRU 1500
> ACCMAP 0x000
On Thu, May 09, 2002 at 03:51:09PM -0700, Archie Cobbs wrote:
>
> So that's screwey if you're doing MPPE encryption because which
> authentication do you use to generate the MPPE keys?? Apparently
> we are using the wrong one. In any case, we can't use the first
> one because we'd need the yes/no
Matthew Braithwaite writes:
> > So that's screwey if you're doing MPPE encryption because which
> > authentication do you use to generate the MPPE keys?? Apparently
> > we are using the wrong one. In any case, we can't use the first
> > one because we'd need the yes/no response to generate MPPE ke
On Thu, 9 May 2002 16:57:37 -0700 (PDT), Archie Cobbs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
>> Let me see if I understand: a key used in CHAP authentication is
>> also used for MPPE. However, I authenticate twice, once using CHAP
>> MSOFTv2 and once using CHAP MSOFTv2 -- and you think mpd is
>> choosing t
On Thu, May 09, 2002 at 08:17:41PM -0700, Matthew Braithwaite wrote:
>
> (One things that's odd about my authentication -- this was pointed out
> to me by the Windows boys, whom I'm sorry I dissed -- is that all the
> Windows users seem to authenticate as ``domain\\user'' whereas I
> authenticate
12 matches
Mail list logo
