On Sat, Feb 23, 2002 at 07:25:20AM -0800, Crist J. Clark wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 23, 2002 at 02:45:35PM +0200, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
> [snip]
>
> > Router B: if0 (192.168.1.1/24) and if1 (192.168.4.1/24)
> > Router A: if0 (192.168.1.2/24)
> >
> > On router A: route add -net 192.168.4 192.168.1.1, t
On Sat, Feb 23, 2002 at 03:49:55PM +0300, Maxim Konovalov wrote:
> On 04:28-0800, Feb 23, 2002, Crist J. Clark wrote:
>
> > On Sat, Feb 23, 2002 at 01:50:33PM +0200, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
> > [snip]
> >
> > > Nice catch!
> >
> > Igor M Podlesny <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, PR misc/35022, caught it. I jus
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Richard A Steenbergen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 22, 2002 at 09:43:58AM -0800, John Polstra wrote:
> > Remember, bpf is used by many things besides tcpdump. Adding these
> > flags would require extending the bpf API. They couldn't be added for
> > t
On Sun, Feb 24, 2002 at 10:49:21AM +0200, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 23, 2002 at 03:49:55PM +0300, Maxim Konovalov wrote:
> > On 04:28-0800, Feb 23, 2002, Crist J. Clark wrote:
> >
> > > On Sat, Feb 23, 2002 at 01:50:33PM +0200, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
> > > [snip]
> > >
> > > > Nice catch
On Sun, Feb 24, 2002 at 10:47:02AM +0200, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 23, 2002 at 07:25:20AM -0800, Crist J. Clark wrote:
[snip]
> > If you are correct, and you can cross interfaces, this is a much
> > bigger problem. I didn't mention it in your first mail, but the
> > in_broadcast() fun
What version of FreeBSD are you using? The ppp included in early 4.x
distributions doesn't have the TCP MSS fixup code that is required to make
things work properly with a PPPoE connection, and cause the kinds of
symptoms that you describe.
Matt
- Original Message -
From: "Greg Black" <
"Matthew Emmerton" wrote:
| From: "Greg Black" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
| To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
| Sent: Friday, February 22, 2002 10:39 PM
| Subject: ppp -nat fails with adsl, but ok with modem
|
| > I've had ppp -nat working just fine over a normal modem link,
| > but it is not working at all well
Out of curiousity, why is the prefix command being phased out? And is
there a way to assign an address based on a prefix and EU64 address to a
device using ifconfig, or do I have to write a script? I haven't found
anything in the man pages regarding this.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL
> "Matthew Emmerton" wrote:
>
> | From: "Greg Black" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> | To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> | Sent: Friday, February 22, 2002 10:39 PM
> | Subject: ppp -nat fails with adsl, but ok with modem
> |
> | > I've had ppp -nat working just fine over a normal modem link,
> | > but it is not wor
"Matthew Emmerton" wrote:
| > | > I've had ppp -nat working just fine over a normal modem link,
| > | > but it is not working at all well on my ADSL link to the same
| > | > provider.
| > | >
| > | > To quantify "not working at all well", although I can ping and
| > | > traceroute ok from the hos
On Sun, Feb 24, 2002 at 10:27:46AM -0800, Crist J. Clark wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 24, 2002 at 10:49:21AM +0200, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
> > On Sat, Feb 23, 2002 at 03:49:55PM +0300, Maxim Konovalov wrote:
> > > On 04:28-0800, Feb 23, 2002, Crist J. Clark wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Sat, Feb 23, 2002 at 01:
11 matches
Mail list logo