>Thor Legvold wrote:
Lars, thanks for the files.
I actually got a connection late last night, although I don't know why.
Haven't been able to reproduce the "error" :-)
Regards,
Thor
>>Still debugging, some questions to verify I have the proper config.
>
>FWIW, attached is an mpd configuratio
But I have no idea why. Nor is the link usable. But I'm happy to see I'm
making progress :-)
As far as I can tell, I did exactly what the docs say not to do (and even
generates a warning when loading the bundle) - I set both remote and peer to
0.0.0.0/0, mpd tells me "IPCP: peer address cannot
A few things I've noticed:
The "default" connection speed seems to be 64000 bps according to the log.
The manual states you don't need to set anything regarding bandwidth or
speed unless you're on an asynchronous dialup (modem, etc). I'm on a 11Mbs
wireless WAN, and would like to know if and h
Hi,
I have an Intel Pro 100/S NIC on FreeBSD 4.4-STABLE connected to a Cisco
Catalyst 3500XL switch at 100Mbps, full-duplex but I only get 15.6Mbps
throughput. I'm transferring ISO images from the FreeBSD machine to an NT
FTP server which is also connected on the same switch.
What's the tested t
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> Hi,
>
> I have an Intel Pro 100/S NIC on FreeBSD 4.4-STABLE connected to a Cisco
> Catalyst 3500XL switch at 100Mbps, full-duplex but I only get 15.6Mbps
> throughput. I'm transferring ISO images from the FreeBSD machine to an NT
> FTP server which is also connec
On Wed, Nov 21, 2001 at 05:32:27PM -0800, Paul Herman wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'd like to pick some brains before I file a PR.
>
There's already a PR open on this, kern/29170.
> I've got 4.4-RELEASE running on FreeBSD-alpha with more than one
> alias on my network interface. I decided to try out rout
> I have an Intel Pro 100/S NIC on FreeBSD 4.4-STABLE connected to a Cisco
> Catalyst 3500XL switch at 100Mbps, full-duplex but I only get 15.6Mbps
> throughput. I'm transferring ISO images from the FreeBSD machine to an NT
> FTP server which is also connected on the same switch.
>
> What's the t
On a single NIC? Are the clients getting data from your host or are they
putting data on the host?
-Original Message-
From: Vladimir B. Grebenschikov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, November 22, 2001 5:36 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Maximum throughp
The hosts are Pentium III 900Mhz machines with 1GB of memory. How do you
check the duplex configuration? On the switch? On the Windows NT machine?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, November 22, 2001 5:39 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EM
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> On a single NIC? Are the clients getting data from your host or are they
> putting data on the host?
None of above.
It was one of my core routers so it was transit IP traffic through router.
And one of NICs reach almost 100Mbps.
> I have got 96% of 100Mbps under r
> The hosts are Pentium III 900Mhz machines with 1GB of memory. How do you
> check the duplex configuration? On the switch? On the Windows NT machine?
On your FreeBSD host, you can check it with the "ifconfig" command. If
you have a managed switch, you should be able to get duplex information
thr
Thanks for all who replied to this thread, indicating that a bad cable was
likely the culprit.
In this case, changing the cable didn't help, but commenting out the
"ifconfig_rl0='up'" line in /etc/rc.conf fixed the problem.
Any ideas on why doing an 'ifconfig rl0 up' before starting PPP (using s
Hello,
what does the message "rtinit:wrong ifa was " exactly mean?
I get it when using "ifconfig" on a NIC but I am able to
use the NIC without any problems (apparently atleast). Can it
cause any problems?
Thanks for your time,
Murthy
__
Hello Thor
On Wed, Nov 21, 2001 at 10:20:54AM + Thor Legvold wrote:
> Well, I've asked 3 or 4 times now in the last 3 weeks, and haven't received
> any answers. Posted to comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc and to both questions- and
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> That leads me to conclude that either I'm
Trond Davidsen writes:
> in the file pptp.c in function PptpHookUp about line 481:
>
>/* Get session info */
>memset(&self_addr, 0, sizeof(self_addr));
>self_addr.sin_family = AF_INET;
>self_addr.sin_len = sizeof(self_addr);
>peer_addr = self_addr;
>
> shouldn't peer_addr get
I can't seem find any reference to ip_fastforward() in ip_input()
anymore.
Is fastforwarding non-functional at the moment?
--
Andre
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message
On Fri, Nov 23, 2001 at 12:38:53AM +0100, Andre Oppermann wrote:
> I can't seem find any reference to ip_fastforward() in ip_input()
> anymore.
because it is called earlier, from ether_input().
(mind you, there is some brokenness in ip_fastforward,
because you cannot know if a packet is fastforwa
On Thu, 22 Nov 2001 14:36:37 + (UTC), in sentex.lists.freebsd.net you
wrote:
>Thanks for all who replied to this thread, indicating that a bad cable was
>likely the culprit.
>
>In this case, changing the cable didn't help, but commenting out the
>"ifconfig_rl0='up'" line in /etc/rc.conf fixed
Hi,
How do you auto-mount vnode disks? I created the file /etc/vntab but it
doesn't work:
/etc/vntab
/dev/vn0c /usr/local/vnodes/file mount=/usr/local/mount_point
the `vn' device is already in the kernel and the devices are present in
/dev. I've already tried this using:
[root@
Hi,
in the file pptp.c in function PptpHookUp about line 481:
/* Get session info */
memset(&self_addr, 0, sizeof(self_addr));
self_addr.sin_family = AF_INET;
self_addr.sin_len = sizeof(self_addr);
peer_addr = self_addr;
shouldn't peer_addr get it's own structure? When I insert l
Matthew Emmerton writes:
> Any ideas on why doing an 'ifconfig rl0 up' before starting PPP (using set
> device PPPoE:rl0) would cause this problem? (These machines are running
> 4.3-REL-p20)
There is a kernel bug in 4.3 where certain interfaces can't deal
with an outgoing packet appearing while
Thor Legvold writes:
> The "default" connection speed seems to be 64000 bps according to the log.
> The manual states you don't need to set anything regarding bandwidth or
> speed unless you're on an asynchronous dialup (modem, etc). I'm on a 11Mbs
> wireless WAN, and would like to know if and
Thor Legvold writes:
> [access] LCP: SendConfigReq #3
> PROTOCOMP
> MRU 1500
> MAGICNUM c685c33c
> AUTHPROTO CHAP MSOFT
> [access] LCP: rec'd Configure Reject #3 link 0 (Ack-Sent)
> AUTHPROTO CHAP MSOFT
You've enabled CHAP in your configuration (via 'set link enable
chap', note, not the same thin
Thor Legvold writes:
> Still debugging, some questions to verify I have the proper config.
>
> FBSD dual homed host/gw for a home LAN
> dc0 home LAN192.168.128.0/24
> wi0 ISP WAN 10.10.0.0/16
>
> IPFW and NAT are running, ipfw is wide open at present, natd running -m -s
> -d
24 matches
Mail list logo
