Re: - RISCom card: lcp illegal conf-req in state initial -

2001-02-26 Thread Kurakin Roman
Hi, It's seems you have some hardware problems, but also sppp have some problems. So if you are using it I sugest to take update for it. You could look at this patch: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=21771 Or better take last version of driver for Cronyx adapters, where is the most

mpd and mschap v2?

2001-02-26 Thread Hroi Sigurdsson
Does mpd/netgraph support MSCHAP v2? I'm trying to connect via PPTP to a firewall which requires MSCHAPv2 and having no luck. -- Hroi Sigurdsson [EMAIL PROTECTED] Netgroup A/S http://www.netgroup.dk To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECT

gateway/proxy arp

2001-02-26 Thread Juha Lindstrom
Hi! I have a somewhat tricky situation with a gateway/proxy arp setup. Let me quickly tell you some backgrounds: 1) I'm connected to internet via university LAN 2) university only allows one MAC address to communicate with the outside world at a time, thus I can not use a HUB 3) I have 2 real IP

Re: gateway/proxy arp

2001-02-26 Thread Julian Elischer
Juha Lindstrom wrote: > > Hi! > > I have a somewhat tricky situation with a gateway/proxy arp setup. Let me > quickly tell you some backgrounds: > > 1) I'm connected to internet via university LAN > 2) university only allows one MAC address to communicate with the outside > world at a time, thu

Quick question about IP aliasing

2001-02-26 Thread Drew J. Weaver
Title: Quick question about IP aliasing     Say I have a main server Ip address of (This is completely made up) 209.190.53.51, and I have 32 IP addresses blocked to it on 209.51.193.32-64 (or whatever, this is an example) would this alias line still be valid for that? I've never done a ser

Problem in configuring netgraph

2001-02-26 Thread Satyajeet Seth
Hi I tried to use ng_ether and ng_bpf as follows: fxp0(lower) --- (bhook)[bpf](nomatch)(hook1)(upper)fxp0 [ ]( match )(hook2)not connected $ ngctl mkpeer fxp0: bpf divert bhook $ ngctl name fxp0:divert bpf0 $ ngctl + msg bpf0: setprogram { thisHook="bhook" i

Re: I have delayed ACK problems

2001-02-26 Thread Mark Peek
At 8:56 AM -0600 2/25/01, Jonathan Lemon wrote: >On Sun, Feb 25, 2001 at 11:10:54AM +0100, Paul Herman wrote: >> On Sat, 24 Feb 2001, Jonathan Lemon wrote: >> >> > On Sat, Feb 24, 2001 at 11:19:02AM -0800, Mark Peek wrote: >> > > Was there ever a final resolution to this problem? >> > >> > Th

sendfile with headers (struct sf_hdtr)

2001-02-26 Thread Peter Lawthers
When using sendfile(2) with the optional headers, it appears that sendfile inadvertently returns the number of bytes written via writev (writev updates p_retval[0]). I checked through the archives, and it doesn't appear that I'm using sendfile(2) incorrectly, although that's always a possibility.

Re: Quick question about IP aliasing

2001-02-26 Thread Rogier R. Mulhuijzen
At 10:27 26-2-01 -0500, you wrote:     Say I have a main server Ip address of (This is completely made up) 209.190.53.51, and I have 32 IP addresses blocked to it on 209.51.193.32-64 (or whatever, this is an example) would this alias line still be valid for that? I've never done a server wher

Re: Quick question about IP aliasing

2001-02-26 Thread Tobias Fredriksson
On Mon, 26 Feb 2001, Drew J. Weaver wrote: > Say I have a main server Ip address of (This is completely made up) > 209.190.53.51, and I have 32 IP addresses blocked to it on 209.51.193.32-64 > (or whatever, this is an example) would this alias line still be valid for > that? I've never do

Re: Quick question about IP aliasing

2001-02-26 Thread Rogier R. Mulhuijzen
At 01:06 27-2-01 +0100, Tobias Fredriksson wrote: >On Mon, 26 Feb 2001, Drew J. Weaver wrote: > > > Say I have a main server Ip address of (This is completely made up) > > 209.190.53.51, and I have 32 IP addresses blocked to it on 209.51.193.32-64 > > (or whatever, this is an example) woul

RE: Quick question about IP aliasing

2001-02-26 Thread Jonathan Graehl
> do 'netmask 255.255.255.255' instead or 'netmask 0x' since this is > an alias... for some reason otherwise services may not bind to the ip > correctly Why would this be? The two are numerically equivalent. -Jon To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-

Frame Relay in Australia with Telstra

2001-02-26 Thread Murray Taylor
I am establishing FreeBSD 4.2 Release (from the CD Roms) on a Compaq A550 and I need to setup a connection to a Telstra frame relay interface (which has yet to be installed) (A) Has anyone in .AU done this? (B) What interface card did you use? and which driver ( sr, ar, cx, ?? ) (C) Which distr

Re: Quick question about IP aliasing

2001-02-26 Thread Matthew Emmerton
> > do 'netmask 255.255.255.255' instead or 'netmask 0x' since this is > > an alias... for some reason otherwise services may not bind to the ip > > correctly > > Why would this be? The two are numerically equivalent. Yes, but you're missing the point. The point is that you need to use

sendfile with headers (struct sf_hdtr)

2001-02-26 Thread Garrett Wollman
< said: > When using sendfile(2) with the optional headers, it appears > that sendfile inadvertently returns the number of bytes written > via writev If any data was sent, sendfile() should tell you so. -GAWollman To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" i

Re: Quick question about IP aliasing

2001-02-26 Thread Justin C . Walker
I think that Roger meant something like: "... instead, or ..." <-- "," added. He's saying they are the same. FWIW, there used to be an "IP alias" tutorial (not the "pedantic ppp" tutorial) referenced from the freebsd web site, but it's disappeared. The former went into a bit of detail o

Re: Quick question about IP aliasing

2001-02-26 Thread Rogier R. Mulhuijzen
At 22:49 26-2-01 -0500, Matthew Emmerton wrote: > > > do 'netmask 255.255.255.255' instead or 'netmask 0x' since this >is > > > an alias... for some reason otherwise services may not bind to the ip > > > correctly > > > > Why would this be? The two are numerically equivalent. He's sayin