> > do 'netmask 255.255.255.255' instead or 'netmask 0xffffffff' since this is > > an alias... for some reason otherwise services may not bind to the ip > > correctly > > Why would this be? The two are numerically equivalent. Yes, but you're missing the point. The point is that you need to use a netmask of 255.255.255.255 for aliased IPs on FreeBSD, regardless of the alias of the primary (non-alias) IP. -- Matt Emmerton To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message
- Quick question about IP aliasing Drew J. Weaver
- Re: Quick question about IP aliasing Rogier R. Mulhuijzen
- Re: Quick question about IP aliasing Tobias Fredriksson
- Re: Quick question about IP aliasing Rogier R. Mulhuijzen
- Re: Quick question about IP aliasing Tobias Fredriksson
- RE: Quick question about IP aliasing Jonathan Graehl
- Re: Quick question about IP aliasing Justin C . Walker
- RE: Quick question about IP aliasing Tobias Fredriksson
- Re: Quick question about IP aliasing Matthew Emmerton
- Re: Quick question about IP aliasing Rogier R. Mulhuijzen
- Re: Quick question about IP aliasing Josef Karthauser
- Re: Quick question about IP aliasing Randy Bush
- Re: Quick question about IP aliasing Luigi Rizzo
- Re: Quick question about IP aliasing Matthew Emmerton
- Re: Quick question about IP aliasing Justin C . Walker
- Re: Quick question about IP aliasing Luigi Rizzo
- Re: Quick question about IP aliasing Alex Rousskov
- Re: Quick question about IP aliasing Tobias Fredriksson
- Re: Quick question about IP aliasing Alex Rousskov