Re: questions about TCP RST validity

2002-07-02 Thread Mike Silbersack
On Tue, 2 Jul 2002, Tom Pavel wrote: > > > On Mon, 1 Jul 2002, Mike Silbersack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > 09:05:36.961787 AA.80 > BB.61390: . 3568529946:3568531406(1460) ack 2597111 > > 261 win 4380 (DF) > > > 09:05:38.973207 AA.80 > BB.61390: . 3568529946:3568531406(1460) ack 25971

Re: questions about TCP RST validity

2002-07-02 Thread Don Lewis
On 1 Jul, Tom Pavel wrote: > > Hi. I'm confused about some code dealing with the acceptance of RSTs > in tcp_input.c. I've gleaned what I can about the history of that > code through the CVS repository, but I'm still looking for some more > insight. The code in question requires that a RST ha

Re: questions about TCP RST validity

2002-07-02 Thread Tom Pavel
> On Mon, 1 Jul 2002, Mike Silbersack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Mon, 1 Jul 2002, Tom Pavel wrote: > > > Here is a trace to illustrate: > > > > 09:05:35.956066 AA.80 > BB.61390: . 3568529946:3568531406(1460) ack 2597111 > 261 win 4380 (DF) > > 09:05:36.961787 AA.80 > BB.61390: . 35685

Re: questions about TCP RST validity

2002-07-01 Thread Mike Silbersack
On Mon, 1 Jul 2002, Tom Pavel wrote: > Here is a trace to illustrate: > > 09:05:35.956066 AA.80 > BB.61390: . 3568529946:3568531406(1460) ack 2597111261 win >4380 (DF) > 09:05:36.961787 AA.80 > BB.61390: . 3568529946:3568531406(1460) ack 2597111261 win >4380 (DF) > 09:05:38.973207 AA.80 > BB.6

questions about TCP RST validity

2002-07-01 Thread Tom Pavel
Hi. I'm confused about some code dealing with the acceptance of RSTs in tcp_input.c. I've gleaned what I can about the history of that code through the CVS repository, but I'm still looking for some more insight. The code in question requires that a RST have a sequence number within the curren