At 10:16 AM 8/25/2006, Archie Cobbs wrote:
>The ng_pptpgre node handles the "data packet" level of PPTP, but most
>of the complexity in PPTP is in the higher level protocol for setup
>and teardown. You'd have to get that in there somehow.
I suppose that the call control facility could be impleme
Brett Glass wrote:
Just wanted to ask about the feasibility of the following idea. Would it
be possible to use the Netgraph PPTP node, in combination with Brian
Somers' userland PPP implementation, to make a PPTP server? It would
work similarly to FreeBSD's "pppoed", whi
Archie, Julian:
Just wanted to ask about the feasibility of the following idea.
Would it be possible to use the Netgraph PPTP node, in combination
with Brian Somers' userland PPP implementation, to make a PPTP
server? It would work similarly to FreeBSD's "pppoed", whic
Brett Glass wrote:
>> It was not originally intended as a large scale server. It could be
>> adapted to that fairly easily but no one has done so yet.
>
> I might be motivated to try; however, I would need to understand more
about its architecture (and about Netgraph, whose mysteries I haven't
p
On Thu, 10 Aug 2006 21:32:22 -0600
Brett Glass <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This company hasn't been using a RADIUS server. They have an Active
> Directory server (yuck!), but I don't know if it would be useful
> for this purpose.
As much as it's a MS solution, why reinvent the wheel / kill you
At 10:22 AM 8/13/2006, Archie Cobbs wrote:
That's more a question for archie as he wrote it, bit it was written to
be a server on small appliance.
Some people have been working on imporving mpd but I don't know
much about it.
It was not originally intended as a large scale server. It could b
Julian Elischer wrote:
Julian, as I recall you were one of the original employees of Whistle
Communications, correct? Perhaps you can explain this: Why does mpd
require all of those link configurations? Was mpd originally intended
to be used as a client only? I'm struggling here because I can't
Brett Glass wrote:
At 09:39 PM 8/10/2006, Julian Elischer wrote:
mpd does all the netgraph manipulation itself.
Julian, as I recall you were one of the original employees of Whistle
Communications, correct? Perhaps you can explain this: Why does mpd
require all of those link configuration
Hi Brett,
On Thu, Aug 10, 2006 at 08:43:28PM -0600, Brett Glass wrote:
> flail around experimenting? If I can't use mpd and PoPToP isn't
> working, what other options are there for a good PPTP server?
It's not PPTP, but maybe OpenVPN is an otion for you:
/usr/p
At 09:39 PM 8/10/2006, Julian Elischer wrote:
mpd does all the netgraph manipulation itself.
Julian, as I recall you were one of the original employees of
Whistle Communications, correct? Perhaps you can explain this: Why
does mpd require all of those link configurations? Was mpd
originally
Brett Glass wrote:
At 09:00 PM 8/10/2006, Ganbold wrote:
It will be much easier if you can write some script to generate mpd
config files. I'm generating config files such way for PPPoE.
Is there a way to avoid having to generate them at all? It seems to me
that it would be very easy for m
At 09:00 PM 8/10/2006, Ganbold wrote:
It will be much easier if you can write some script to generate
mpd config files. I'm generating config files such way for PPPoE.
Is there a way to avoid having to generate them at all? It seems to
me that it would be very easy for mpd to create netgraph
Brett Glass wrote:
I've been asked to work on a PPTP server for a large company which has
up to 100 users tunneling in at once. They currently have a FreeBSD
machine set up to use FreeBSD's userland PPP together with the PoPToP
pptp daemon. (They have a hacked version of PoPToP wh
I've been asked to work on a PPTP server for a large company which
has up to 100 users tunneling in at once. They currently have a
FreeBSD machine set up to use FreeBSD's userland PPP together with
the PoPToP pptp daemon. (They have a hacked version of PoPToP which
allows different
Andy Gilligan wrote:
- Original Message -
From: "Yann Nottara" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2003 6:53 PM
Subject: Re: MPD 3.13 PPTP server MTU problems & questions
but now, what do you think of this ?
ng0: flags=88d1 m
Yann Nottara wrote:
> but now, what do you think of this ?
>
> ng0: flags=88d1 mtu 1500
> inet6 fe80::2b0:d0ff:fee1:4874%ng0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x7
> inet 192.168.0.10 --> 192.168.0.200 netmask 0x
>
> and here's the part from my mpd.conf that's related to this connecti
- Original Message -
From: "Yann Nottara" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2003 6:53 PM
Subject: Re: MPD 3.13 PPTP server MTU problems & questions
> but now, what do you think of this ?
>
> ng0: flags=88d1
Andy Gilligan wrote:
- Original Message -
From: "Yann Nottara" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Zs you can see in the following real world example, ng0 (which IS up)
MTU stays at 1500 although it's configured to be at 1460 in the mpd.conf
configuration file :
ng0: flags=8890 mtu 1500
inet6 f
- Original Message -
From: "Yann Nottara" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2003 5:41 PM
Subject: Re: MPD 3.13 PPTP server MTU problems & questions
> Zs you can see in the following real world example, ng0 (which IS up)
Nikolai SAOUKH wrote:
| As you'll see in the logs below and from ifconfig output, altough the
| ngX interfaces MTU is set to 1460 with "set link mtu 1460", it stays at
| 1500. Any idea why ?
The asked mtu size will be available (set) only when interface is in UP
state. When the ngX is in down s
| As you'll see in the logs below and from ifconfig output, altough the
| ngX interfaces MTU is set to 1460 with "set link mtu 1460", it stays at
| 1500. Any idea why ?
The asked mtu size will be available (set) only when interface is in UP
state. When the ngX is in down state it has default va
pd: [pptp0] exec: command returned 256
Jul 16 18:52:13 bull mpd: [pptp0] IFACE: Up event
Jul 16 18:52:13 bull mpd: [pptp0] rec'd unexpected protocol IP on link -1
My other problem (maybe related to the previous one ?) is SMB browsing :
PPTP clients connected through the VPN can see but
Olivier Cherrier wrote:
I'm using MPD 3.10 on a FreeBSD 4.4-STABLE #0: Sat Apr 13
19:16:07 CEST
Isn'it a problem to run a recent MPD application on
an 'old' 4.4 system?
I'd agree with you but in my case, apart from what seems to be a few
unnecessary verbosity,
Archie Cobbs wrote:
Yann Nottara wrote:
[...]
So, my questions regarding the logs are :
1) What does "exec: command returned 256" means ?
The "route add" command failed for some reason. Does the route
already exist?
So it seems, I'll have to check.
2) What "does rec'd unexpected protocol
there were some bugfixes to the netgraph modules
since 4.4
On Wed, 18 Dec 2002, Olivier Cherrier wrote:
> > I'm using MPD 3.10 on a FreeBSD 4.4-STABLE #0: Sat Apr 13
> > 19:16:07 CEST
>
> Isn'it a problem to run a recent MPD application on
> an 'old' 4.4 system?
>
> Thanks.
> oc
>
> To Uns
> I'm using MPD 3.10 on a FreeBSD 4.4-STABLE #0: Sat Apr 13
> 19:16:07 CEST
Isn'it a problem to run a recent MPD application on
an 'old' 4.4 system?
Thanks.
oc
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message
Yann Nottara wrote:
> Dec 17 13:59:02 bull mpd: 192.168.0.10 -> 192.168.0.202
> Dec 17 13:59:02 bull mpd: [pptp2] IFACE: Up event
> Dec 17 13:59:02 bull mpd: [pptp2] exec: /sbin/ifconfig ng0 192.168.0.10
> 192.168.0.202 netmask 0x -link0
> Dec 17 13:59:02 bull mpd: [pptp2] exec: /usr/sbi
Hi !
I'm using MPD 3.10 on a FreeBSD 4.4-STABLE #0: Sat Apr 13 19:16:07 CEST
2002 machine. I've setup a PPTP server allowing remote access to the
local network for the Win2k integrated PPTP client.
Works OK so far but I got some messages in my logs that I don't
understand. I ha
Hi,
--- Archie Cobbs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Carlos Carnero writes:
> > I've succesfully configured mpd as PPTP server for
> > VPNs. But I have one stumbling block: when I
> > connect to the server from a Windows XP client,
> > the new connection gets a
Carlos Carnero writes:
> I've succesfully configured mpd as PPTP server for
> VPNs. But I have one stumbling block: when I connect
> to the server from a Windows XP client, the new
> connection gets assigned the same IP address as the
> default gateway. For instance:
&g
Hi,
I've succesfully configured mpd as PPTP server for
VPNs. But I have one stumbling block: when I connect
to the server from a Windows XP client, the new
connection gets assigned the same IP address as the
default gateway. For instance:
Client IP address: 192.168.250.240
Client ne
Elliott Perrin writes:
> I am not currently on freebsd-net so if you could cc me in replies it would be
> appreciated.
>
> I have a FreeBSD 4.6.2-RELEASE running mpd 3.9 serving as a PPTP server.
>
> I have setup PPTP boxes using MPD before but have run into a problem this ti
I am not currently on freebsd-net so if you could cc me in replies it would be
appreciated.
I have a FreeBSD 4.6.2-RELEASE running mpd 3.9 serving as a PPTP server.
I have setup PPTP boxes using MPD before but have run into a problem this time. In
the past I would use
set ipcp ranges 1.2.3.4
On Tuesday 02 July 2002 21:14, Archie Cobbs wrote:
> Peter J. Blok writes:
> > I have a gateway/firewall which is the spider in the web for different IP
> > segments. From two segments 192.168.2.0/24 and 192.168.10.0/24 I am
> > trying to setup PPTP tunnels. I have two different pptp sections (ppt
Anthony Volodkin writes:
> - Now that perfectly works, (proxy-arp too, is very impressive) I am
> trying to figure out how to forward broadcast packets from ng0 to fxp0
> and vice-versa. Something tells me since this is an interface created
> by netgraph, it should be possible. I tried the et
Peter J. Blok writes:
> I have a gateway/firewall which is the spider in the web for different IP
> segments. From two segments 192.168.2.0/24 and 192.168.10.0/24 I am trying to
> setup PPTP tunnels. I have two different pptp sections (pptp1 and pptp2) in
> both mpd.conf and mpd.links with uniq
Hi,
I have a gateway/firewall which is the spider in the web for different IP
segments. From two segments 192.168.2.0/24 and 192.168.10.0/24 I am trying to
setup PPTP tunnels. I have two different pptp sections (pptp1 and pptp2) in
both mpd.conf and mpd.links with unique names. Each pptp secti
ow why Windows 98 doesn't work with MPD? I
>haven't heard 1 successful story with FBSD -> Win98 (i can get FBSD ->
>Win2K to work with no problems using CHAP and PAP). Any insight would
>be great.
>
>JE> On Sun, 30 Jun 2002, Anthony Volodkin wrote:
>
>
>
. Any insight would
be great.
JE> On Sun, 30 Jun 2002, Anthony Volodkin wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Julian Elischer suggested that I use mpd to setup a pptp link instead of
>> PoPtoP (thank you)
>> I am now having problems with mpd. I configured it as a pptp server
>&
On Sun, 30 Jun 2002, Anthony Volodkin wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Julian Elischer suggested that I use mpd to setup a pptp link instead of
> PoPtoP (thank you)
> I am now having problems with mpd. I configured it as a pptp server
> accoring to instructions, but it never re
Hi,
Julian Elischer suggested that I use mpd to setup a pptp link instead of
PoPtoP (thank you)
I am now having problems with mpd. I configured it as a pptp server
accoring to instructions, but it never responds to requests.
Furthermore, I doubt it even listens for them, because it does not
GM GG ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Can you suggest a config for mpd used like a
> pptp client ? It seems to me there is not such
> config sample in the provided mpd.conf default.
Sure, I'll include some that I've used
successfully -
client configs are old and haven't been tested
recently - they
Hi,
I am trying to implement a small vpn solutions with mpd as pptp server and
pptpclient from home to office. I have setup also in other implementations
and it works fine, but I need for this situations pptp server...
The office is connected directly to the net, while at home I am using user
Hi,
I am trying to implement a small vpn solutions with mpd as pptp server and
pptpclient from home to office. I have setup also in other implementations
and it works fine, but I need for this situations pptp server...
The office is connected directly to the net, while at home I am using user
--- "Mike A. Oligny" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ha
scritto: > GM GG ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> > I am trying to implement a small vpn solutions
> with
> > mpd as pptp server and pptpclient from home to
> office.
>
> Just a thought - I ha
GM GG ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Hi,
> I am trying to implement a small vpn solutions with
> mpd as pptp server and pptpclient from home to office.
Just a thought - I have had much better luck using MPD
for both sides of the pptp equation. pptpclient seemed
quite unstable the last
Hi,
I am trying to implement a small vpn solutions with
mpd as pptp server and pptpclient from home to office.
I have setup also in other implementations and it
works fine, but I need for this situations pptp
server...
The office is connected directly to the net, while at
home I am using user ppp
Julian Elischer writes:
> > I solved my own problem... it turns out that my naming conventions caused
> > an issue when MPD labelled the PPP node. It truncated the bundle names at
> > 8 characters, and since mine were 8 characters plus a number following the
> > truncated names for all the links
On Mon, 4 Mar 2002, Ryan Morris wrote:
> I solved my own problem... it turns out that my naming conventions caused
> an issue when MPD labelled the PPP node. It truncated the bundle names at
> 8 characters, and since mine were 8 characters plus a number following the
> truncated names for all
set pptp self 63.x.x.x
> set pptp enable incoming
> set pptp disable originate
>
> The 63.x.x.x address is the public external address, and 192.168.100.1
> is my server VPN endpoint address as well as my internal IP address on
> my LAN.
>
> Joe
>
> >
Joe Clarke wrote:
>
> In my setup the pptp self address is always the same, but it isn't the
> same address I use as the server VPN endpoint address.
just a hint
To increase readability try do your pptp rules as so:
>
> load pptpuser1
> load pptpuser2
>
>pptp_common_settings:
> set if
the public external address, and 192.168.100.1
is my server VPN endpoint address as well as my internal IP address on
my LAN.
Joe
>
> On Fri, 1 Mar 2002, Ryan Morris wrote:
>
> > Hello everyone,
> >
> > I recently (successfully) configured MPD-netgraph as a pptp server on m
What if you change the self ipaddress in mpd.links?
they are the same in both connections
On Fri, 1 Mar 2002, Ryan Morris wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> I recently (successfully) configured MPD-netgraph as a pptp server on my
> FreeBSD machine. It works great... for one user. When
On Fri, 1 Mar 2002, Ryan Morris wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> I recently (successfully) configured MPD-netgraph as a pptp server on my
> FreeBSD machine. It works great... for one user. When I change my
> configuration to support multiple PPTP bundles/links I get the followi
Hello everyone,
I recently (successfully) configured MPD-netgraph as a pptp server on my
FreeBSD machine. It works great... for one user. When I change my
configuration to support multiple PPTP bundles/links I get the following
error when starting mpd:
bsd# mpd
Multi-link PPP for FreeBSD, by
Dan Larsson writes:
> I've got a FreeBSD-4.4 STABLE box running mpd-netgraph
> as a PPTP server, which works just fine.
>
> Is it by any chance possible to support IPX (the Novell
> protocol) with MPD in this configuration?
Mpd does not support IPX currently, and I don'
I've got a FreeBSD-4.4 STABLE box running mpd-netgraph
as a PPTP server, which works just fine.
Is it by any chance possible to support IPX (the Novell
protocol) with MPD in this configuration?
Pointers most welcome.
Regards
+--
Dan Larsson -+- Tyfon Svenska AB -+- DL1999-RIPE
2AA5
w 100 simultaneous client connecting to my pptp server,
> do i have to repeat the entry above 100 times, increasing pptp0 and ng0
> values respectively? this would result in a very big mpd.conf and mpd.links
> file.
Unfortunately, yes..
> is there any other simple way that will keep t
set pptp self xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx
set pptp enable incoming
set pptp disable originate
and if i want to allow 100 simultaneous client connecting to my pptp server,
do i have to repeat the entry above 100 times, increasing pptp0 and ng0
values respectively? this would result in a
Olivier Cherrier writes:
> >It should work with all Windows clients as long as they don't
> >require MS-CHAP version 2 authentication.
>
> Yes, it works.
> It works fine.
> But there is no encryption of data between MPD and windows clients... When I
> do some work in a such connection, I can read
>It should work with all Windows clients as long as they don't
>require MS-CHAP version 2 authentication.
>
Yes, it works.
It works fine.
But there is no encryption of data between MPD and windows clients... When I
do some work in a such connection, I can read data with a tcpdump ...
Nevertheles
Julian Elischer writes:
> > Olivier Cherrier writes:
> > > Ho, I think that I found my problem ... maybe
> > > In fact, the "mppe encryption" is included in the MS-Chap protocol, isn't it
> >
> > MPPE encryption piggybacks on MPPC compression. You can have
> > either or both of 'E' and/or 'C'. Mp
Archie Cobbs wrote:
>
> Olivier Cherrier writes:
> > Ho, I think that I found my problem ... maybe
> > In fact, the "mppe encryption" is included in the MS-Chap protocol, isn't it
>
> MPPE encryption piggybacks on MPPC compression. You can have
> either or both of 'E' and/or 'C'. Mpd only suppor
Olivier Cherrier writes:
> Ho, I think that I found my problem ... maybe
> In fact, the "mppe encryption" is included in the MS-Chap protocol, isn't it
MPPE encryption piggybacks on MPPC compression. You can have
either or both of 'E' and/or 'C'. Mpd only supports 'E' because
'C' requires proprie
p protocol, isn't it
?
The encryption, as mpd 3.2 calls it, isn't supported by windows clients.
I tcpdumped a session between my pptp server and a windows client : I got :
<<
...
22:14:37.382601 193.190.156.147 > mirador.cediti.be: gre-proto-0x880B (gre
encap)
22:14:37.383061 m
> Has someone succeed in using mpd as pptp server with windows
>clients ?
>
>yes many many have..
>
>I have done it but not here. It was relatively easy..
>wait for archie to come on line (He's in California)
>to help find your problem..
>
Yes, I've alr
Olivier Cherrier wrote:
>
> Hi.
>
> I would like to install a pptp server on a FreeBox 4.2 firewall.
> I have to allow remote connections from windows clients (Win 98 - 2k) to
> this firewall. This firewall runs IPF and IPNat.
>
> I tried mpd 3.2
> (ftp://ftp.freeb
Hi.
I would like to install a pptp server on a FreeBox 4.2 firewall.
I have to allow remote connections from windows clients (Win 98 - 2k) to
this firewall. This firewall runs IPF and IPNat.
I tried mpd 3.2
(ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/branches/-current/ports/net/mpd-netgraph/
pkg-descr
68 matches
Mail list logo
