On Thursday, November 29, 2001, at 05:01 , Ahsan Ali wrote:
>> For TCP, that is what is always used by default when creating an
>> outbound connection. For incoming connections, the machine will of
>> course reply using the IP address the connection came in on. And a
>> program can always reques
On Thu, Nov 29, 2001 at 06:01:04PM +0500, Ahsan Ali wrote:
> > For TCP, that is what is always used by default when creating an
> > outbound connection. For incoming connections, the machine will of
> > course reply using the IP address the connection came in on. And a
> > program can always reque
> For TCP, that is what is always used by default when creating an
> outbound connection. For incoming connections, the machine will of
> course reply using the IP address the connection came in on. And a
> program can always request to use a specific address if it wants to.
>
> I am not sure wher
On Wednesday, November 28, 2001, at 11:52 , Crist J. Clark wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 28, 2001 at 10:24:28PM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> FWIW, the FreeBSD FAQ (10.9) sez this (it's a one-liner that shows the
>> netmask 0x).
>
> I'll send in a doc PR for this. The ifconfig(8) page gets i
On Wed, Nov 28, 2001 at 10:24:28PM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> FWIW, the FreeBSD FAQ (10.9) sez this (it's a one-liner that shows the
> netmask 0x).
I'll send in a doc PR for this. The ifconfig(8) page gets it right.
alias Establish an additional network address for this in
On Thu, Nov 29, 2001 at 09:15:34AM +0500, Ahsan Ali wrote:
> > Somebody told you wrong. When adding an alias _which is on the same
> > logical network_ as other addresses, it should have an 0x
> > mask. That is, only one address on an interface should have the "real"
> > netmask for any on
FWIW, the FreeBSD FAQ (10.9) sez this (it's a one-liner that shows the
netmask 0x).
Regards,
Justin
On Wednesday, November 28, 2001, at 05:08 , Crist J. Clark wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 28, 2001 at 08:37:42AM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>
>> somebody told me that, when aliasing, the 2n
On Wed, Nov 28, 2001 at 08:37:42AM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> somebody told me that, when aliasing, the 2nd to ´n´ ipaddress netmask must not be
>the regular one, but 0x instead. Example:
>
> rl0 = 200.200.200.200 netmask 255.255.0.0
> rl0:0 (the aliased) 200.200.220.200 netma
somebody told me that, when aliasing, the 2nd to ´n´ ipaddress netmask must not be
the regular one, but 0x instead. Example:
rl0 = 200.200.200.200 netmask 255.255.0.0
rl0:0 (the aliased) 200.200.220.200 netmask 0x
[lots more]
rl0:3000 200.200.255.200 netmask 0x
is it f
