On Wednesday, November 28, 2001, at 11:52 , Crist J. Clark wrote:

> On Wed, Nov 28, 2001 at 10:24:28PM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> FWIW, the FreeBSD FAQ (10.9) sez this (it's a one-liner that shows the
>> netmask 0xffffffff).
>
> I'll send in a doc PR for this. The ifconfig(8) page gets it right.
>
>      alias   Establish an additional network address for this 
> interface.  This
>              is sometimes useful when changing network numbers, and one 
> wishes
>              to accept packets addressed to the old interface.  If the 
> address
>              is on the same subnet as the first network address for this
>              interface, a netmask of 0xffffffff has to be specified.

 From the nitpick front: shouldn't that be "...on the same subnet as an 
existing network address..."?

Regards,

Justin

---
Justin C. Walker, Curmudgeon-At-Large  *
Institute for General Semantics        |       Men are from Earth.
                                        |       Women are from Earth.
                                        |       Deal with it.
*--------------------------------------*-------------------------------*


To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message

Reply via email to