On 15 March 2012 12:09, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
>> I forget, is it possible to not compile in multi-FIB support?
>
> 1) does this have anything to do with this thread?
It depends if the eventual aim of this is to just have multi-FIB
support enabled by default with no way to compile it out, and wha
On 15. Mar 2012, at 19:04 , Adrian Chadd wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I forget, is it possible to not compile in multi-FIB support?
1) does this have anything to do with this thread?
2) yes, if you can live without your routing table, no if not. Not sure you
can spare the 240(?) bytes on 64bit if you jus
Hi,
I forget, is it possible to not compile in multi-FIB support?
Adrian
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Hi,
back in September last year I had prototyped a patch to make the multi-FIB
kernel option just a default removing the need for it to be set for the
maximum number of FIBs allowed. This is allowing the multi-FIB feature to
be used with GENERIC kernels by just changing the tunable.
Thanks to Al
