On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 8:25 PM, Kevin Bowling wrote:
> Right off the bat, FreeBSD doesn't really understand NUMA in any sufficient
> capacity. Unfortunately at companies like the one I work at, we take that
> to mean "OK buy a high bin CPU and only populate one socket" which serves
> us well and
On 03/08/17 10:03, Mateusz Guzik wrote:
First and foremost there is general kernel scalability. Certain counters
and most locks are purely managed with atomic operations. An atomic
operation grabs the entire cacheline with the particular variable (64
bytes in total) in exclusive mode.
Isn't pro
On Wed, Mar 08, 2017 at 04:03:46PM +0100, Mateusz Guzik wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 08, 2017 at 03:57:10PM +0300, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 08, 2017 at 05:25:57AM -0700, Kevin Bowling wrote:
> >
> > > Right off the bat, FreeBSD doesn't really understand NUMA in any
> > > sufficient
> >
On Wed, Mar 08, 2017 at 03:57:10PM +0300, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 08, 2017 at 05:25:57AM -0700, Kevin Bowling wrote:
>
> > Right off the bat, FreeBSD doesn't really understand NUMA in any sufficient
> > capacity. Unfortunately at companies like the one I work at, we take that
> >
On Wed, Mar 08, 2017 at 05:25:57AM -0700, Kevin Bowling wrote:
> Right off the bat, FreeBSD doesn't really understand NUMA in any sufficient
> capacity. Unfortunately at companies like the one I work at, we take that
> to mean "OK buy a high bin CPU and only populate one socket" which serves
NUM
Right off the bat, FreeBSD doesn't really understand NUMA in any sufficient
capacity. Unfortunately at companies like the one I work at, we take that
to mean "OK buy a high bin CPU and only populate one socket" which serves
us well and may ultimately be the best value but does nothing to address
t
On Wed, Mar 08, 2017 at 09:00:34AM +0500, Eugene M. Zheganin wrote:
> Hi.
>
> Some have probably seen this already -
> http://lists.dragonflybsd.org/pipermail/users/2017-March/313254.html
>
> So, could anyone explain why FreeBSD was owned that much. Test is split
> into two parts, one is ngin
Hi.
Some have probably seen this already -
http://lists.dragonflybsd.org/pipermail/users/2017-March/313254.html
So, could anyone explain why FreeBSD was owned that much. Test is split
into two parts, one is nginx part, and the other is the IPv4 forwarding
part. I understand that nginx ownag
