On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 8:25 PM, Kevin Bowling <kevin.bowl...@kev009.com> wrote: > Right off the bat, FreeBSD doesn't really understand NUMA in any sufficient > capacity. Unfortunately at companies like the one I work at, we take that > to mean "OK buy a high bin CPU and only populate one socket" which serves > us well and may ultimately be the best value but does nothing to address > the reality that multi-socket NUMA systems are common place and FreeBSD > should run in the same league on them as other operating systems to be > taken seriously. I'd be interested in seeing how the contenders look by > removing one of the CPUs as it might at least put a spotlight on that issue. > > With respect to SO_REUSEPORT, we are investigating implementing this round > robin behavior right now. We think librss is a better way to go for
Google's SO_REUSEPORT is not round robin. dfly distributes SYN using RSS hash; but definitely not round-robin. Thanks, sephe _______________________________________________ freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
