Physical: Unit C01, Corporate Park 66, 269 Von Willich Avenue,
> Centurion
>
>
> From: Santiago Martinez [s...@codenetworks.net]
> Sent: Wednesday, September 22, 2021 11:22 AM
> To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
> Subject: Re: Vector Pa
Physical: Unit C01, Corporate Park 66, 269 Von Willich Avenue, Centurion
From: Santiago Martinez [s...@codenetworks.net]
Sent: Wednesday, September 22, 2021 11:22 AM
To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Vector Packet Processing (VPP) portability on
Hi Francois, I hope you are doing well.
It is great to hear about work/progress/updates on VPP / DPDK / Netmap
on FBSD, even if the results are not the best.
Unfortunately, I'm not a developer, so I cannot help much on the matter
of the missing bits.
Just wondering if those modifications that
Hi
This is just some feedback for those who had an interest in this topic.
After spending quite some time on the VPP to FreeBSD porting effort where we
did manage to get VPP working with netmap, and VPP compiling with DPDK; We
realised that there are some big issues that we would need to overco
The one other thing I want to mention, what this means in effect is every
que ends up limited by EITR on ixgbe (around 30kps with the default
settings) whether it’s a TX or RX workload. This ends up working ok if you
have sufficient CPU but seems awkward. On the TX workload we should need a
magni
I don't fully understand the issue, but in iflib_fast_intr_rxtx
https://cgit.freebsd.org/src/tree/sys/net/iflib.c#n1581 it seems like
we end up re-enabling interrupts per course instead of only handling
spurious cases or some low water threshold (which seems like it would
be tricky to do here). Th
Il giorno mar 18 mag 2021 alle ore 09:32 Kevin Bowling <
kevin.bowl...@kev009.com> ha scritto:
>
>
> On Mon, May 17, 2021 at 10:20 AM Marko Zec wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 17 May 2021 09:53:25 +
>> Francois ten Krooden wrote:
>>
>> > On 2021/05/16 09:22, Vincenzo Maffione wrote:
>> >
>> > >
>> > > H
+1
Thanks,
Vincenzo
Il giorno lun 17 mag 2021 alle ore 19:20 Marko Zec ha scritto:
> On Mon, 17 May 2021 09:53:25 +
> Francois ten Krooden wrote:
>
> > On 2021/05/16 09:22, Vincenzo Maffione wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > > Yes, you are not using emulated netmap mode.
> > >
> > > In
On Mon, May 17, 2021 at 10:20 AM Marko Zec wrote:
> On Mon, 17 May 2021 09:53:25 +
> Francois ten Krooden wrote:
>
> > On 2021/05/16 09:22, Vincenzo Maffione wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > > Yes, you are not using emulated netmap mode.
> > >
> > > In the test setup depicted here
> > > ht
On Mon, 17 May 2021 09:53:25 +
Francois ten Krooden wrote:
> On 2021/05/16 09:22, Vincenzo Maffione wrote:
>
> >
> > Hi,
> > Yes, you are not using emulated netmap mode.
> >
> > In the test setup depicted here
> > https://github.com/ftk-ntq/vpp/wiki/VPP-throughput-using-netmap-
> > inter
On 2021/05/16 09:22, Vincenzo Maffione wrote:
>
> Hi,
> Yes, you are not using emulated netmap mode.
>
> In the test setup depicted here
> https://github.com/ftk-ntq/vpp/wiki/VPP-throughput-using-netmap-
> interfaces#test-setup
> I think you should really try to replace VPP with the netmap "br
On 2021/05/14 16:11, Jim Thompson wrote:
> On May 13, 2021, at 7:02 AM, Francois ten Krooden wrote:
>
>
> > Thank you. I did set this to 1 specifically now and it still works. So
> > then it
> > should be running in native mode.
> >
> > I will dig a bit into the function that processes the in
Hi,
Yes, you are not using emulated netmap mode.
In the test setup depicted here
https://github.com/ftk-ntq/vpp/wiki/VPP-throughput-using-netmap-interfaces#test-setup
I think you should really try to replace VPP with the netmap "bridge"
application (tools/tools/netmap/bridge.c), and see what n
> On May 13, 2021, at 7:02 AM, Francois ten Krooden wrote:
>
>
>>
>>
>> Thank you. I did set this to 1 specifically now and it still works. So
>> then it
>> should be running in native mode.
>>
>> I will dig a bit into the function that processes the incoming packets.
>> The code I curr
On 2021/05/11 16:27, Jim Thompson wrote:
>
> > On May 11, 2021, at 7:04 AM, Mark Johnston wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, May 11, 2021 at 12:43:10PM +, Francois ten Krooden wrote:
> >> On Monday, 10 May 2021 16:10 Konstantin Belousov wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>> On Mon, May 10, 2021 at 11:08:18AM +, Fr
On Tue, May 11, 2021 at 12:43:10PM +, Francois ten Krooden wrote:
>
> On Tue, May 11, 2021 at 12:43:10PM +, Francois ten Krooden wrote:
> > On Monday, 10 May 2021 16:10 Konstantin Belousov wrote:
> >
> >
> > > On Mon, May 10, 2021 at 11:08:18AM +, Francois ten Krooden
> wrote:
> > > >
On Thu, May 13, 2021 at 2:57 PM Luigi Rizzo wrote:
>
> On Thu, May 13, 2021 at 1:27 PM Francois ten Krooden wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Thursday, 13 May 2021 13:05 Luigi Rizzo wrote:
> > >
> > > On Thu, May 13, 2021 at 10:42 AM Francois ten Krooden
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hi
> > > >
> > > > Just
On Thu, May 13, 2021 at 1:27 PM Francois ten Krooden wrote:
>
>
> On Thursday, 13 May 2021 13:05 Luigi Rizzo wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, May 13, 2021 at 10:42 AM Francois ten Krooden
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi
> > >
> > > Just for info I ran a test using TREX (https://trex-tgn.cisco.com/)
> > > Where I
On Thu, May 13, 2021 at 10:42 AM Francois ten Krooden wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> Just for info I ran a test using TREX (https://trex-tgn.cisco.com/)
> Where I just sent traffic in one direction through the box running FreeBSD
> with VPP using the netmap interfaces.
> These were the results we found befor
On Thursday, 13 May 2021 15:02, Luigi Rizzo
>
> On Thu, May 13, 2021 at 2:57 PM Luigi Rizzo wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, May 13, 2021 at 1:27 PM Francois ten Krooden
> wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > On Thursday, 13 May 2021 13:05 Luigi Rizzo wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, May 13, 2021 at 10:42 AM Francois t
On Thursday, 13 May 2021 13:59 Jacques Fourie
>
> On Thu, May 13, 2021 at 7:27 AM Francois ten Krooden
> wrote:
>
> On Thursday, 13 May 2021 13:05 Luigi Rizzo wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, May 13, 2021 at 10:42 AM Francois ten Krooden
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi
> > >
> > > Just for info I ran a test usi
On Thu, May 13, 2021 at 7:27 AM Francois ten Krooden
wrote:
>
> On Thursday, 13 May 2021 13:05 Luigi Rizzo wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, May 13, 2021 at 10:42 AM Francois ten Krooden
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi
> > >
> > > Just for info I ran a test using TREX (https://trex-tgn.cisco.com/)
> > > Where I
On Thursday, 13 May 2021 13:05 Luigi Rizzo wrote:
>
> On Thu, May 13, 2021 at 10:42 AM Francois ten Krooden
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi
> >
> > Just for info I ran a test using TREX (https://trex-tgn.cisco.com/)
> > Where I just sent traffic in one direction through the box running FreeBSD
> with VPP u
: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
> Subject: RE: Vector Packet Processing (VPP) portability on FreeBSD
>
> On 2021/05/10 15:39, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Luigi Rizzo [mailto:ri...@iet.unipi.it]
> > Sent: Monday, 10 May 2021 16:39
> > T
> On May 11, 2021, at 7:04 AM, Mark Johnston wrote:
>
> On Tue, May 11, 2021 at 12:43:10PM +, Francois ten Krooden wrote:
>> On Monday, 10 May 2021 16:10 Konstantin Belousov wrote:
>>
>>
>>> On Mon, May 10, 2021 at 11:08:18AM +, Francois ten Krooden wrote:
3. What are suitable a
On Tue, May 11, 2021 at 12:43:10PM +, Francois ten Krooden wrote:
> On Monday, 10 May 2021 16:10 Konstantin Belousov wrote:
>
>
> > On Mon, May 10, 2021 at 11:08:18AM +, Francois ten Krooden wrote:
> > > 3. What are suitable alternatives for reading information from procfs and
> > sysfs
On Monday, 10 May 2021 16:10 Konstantin Belousov wrote:
> On Mon, May 10, 2021 at 11:08:18AM +, Francois ten Krooden wrote:
> > Greetings
> >
> > We have a vested interest in high-speed IPsec VPN on FreeBSD. We have
> started with the porting of VPP (https://fd.io/) to FreeBSD.
> >
> > Curre
On Monday, 10 May 2021 15:41 Jacques Fourie
wrote:
> On Mon, May 10, 2021 at 8:42 AM Rainer Duffner
> wrote:
>
>
> > Am 10.05.2021 um 13:08 schrieb Francois ten Krooden
> :
> >
> > Greetings
> >
> > We have a vested interest in high-speed IPsec VPN on FreeBSD. We have
> started with the porting
On 2021/05/10 15:39, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
> -Original Message-
> From: Luigi Rizzo [mailto:ri...@iet.unipi.it]
> Sent: Monday, 10 May 2021 16:39
> To: Rainer Duffner
> Cc: Francois ten Krooden ; freebsd-net@freebsd.org
> Subject: Re: Vector Packet Processing (VPP) port
[repost since it appears to be blocked]
On Mon, May 10, 2021 at 2:42 PM Rainer Duffner wrote:
>
>
>
> > Am 10.05.2021 um 13:08 schrieb Francois ten Krooden :
> >
> > Greetings
> >
> > We have a vested interest in high-speed IPsec VPN on FreeBSD. We have
> > started with the porting of VPP (https
On Monday, May 10, 2021, Rainer Duffner wrote:
>
>
> > Am 10.05.2021 um 13:08 schrieb Francois ten Krooden :
> >
> > Greetings
> >
> > We have a vested interest in high-speed IPsec VPN on FreeBSD. We have
> started with the porting of VPP (https://fd.io/) to FreeBSD.
> >
> > Currently we have VPP
On Mon, May 10, 2021 at 11:08:18AM +, Francois ten Krooden wrote:
> Greetings
>
> We have a vested interest in high-speed IPsec VPN on FreeBSD. We have started
> with the porting of VPP (https://fd.io/) to FreeBSD.
>
> Currently we have VPP compiled and running with netmap. The speeds we mea
On Mon, May 10, 2021 at 8:42 AM Rainer Duffner
wrote:
>
>
> > Am 10.05.2021 um 13:08 schrieb Francois ten Krooden :
> >
> > Greetings
> >
> > We have a vested interest in high-speed IPsec VPN on FreeBSD. We have
> started with the porting of VPP (https://fd.io/) to FreeBSD.
> >
> > Currently we h
> Am 10.05.2021 um 13:08 schrieb Francois ten Krooden :
>
> Greetings
>
> We have a vested interest in high-speed IPsec VPN on FreeBSD. We have started
> with the porting of VPP (https://fd.io/) to FreeBSD.
>
> Currently we have VPP compiled and running with netmap. The speeds we measure
> a
Greetings
We have a vested interest in high-speed IPsec VPN on FreeBSD. We have started
with the porting of VPP (https://fd.io/) to FreeBSD.
Currently we have VPP compiled and running with netmap. The speeds we measure
are nowhere near the performance of a 10Gbps link, at around 350kpps for 150
35 matches
Mail list logo
