On 2021/05/14 16:11, Jim Thompson wrote: > On May 13, 2021, at 7:02 AM, Francois ten Krooden <f...@nanoteq.com> wrote: > > > > Thank you. I did set this to 1 specifically now and it still works. So > > then it > > should be running in native mode. > > > > I will dig a bit into the function that processes the incoming packets. > > The code I currently use was added to VPP in somewhere before 2016, so it > > might be that there is a bug in that code. > > > > Will try and see if I can find anything interesting there. > > It was added to plumb in a TCP stack, (mstack, iirc) prior to the VPP group > writing their own. L > > Your netmap-fed results are also quite low. loos@ (who wrote netmap-fwd) was > getting 2.23Mpps single core on a xeon D-1540. > I did a re-test this morning just to make sure of the results. It seems like I did have a mistake in the previous measurements for netmap-fwd. The updated results is show below. It managed to achieve 2.989 Mpps on a single core on the hardware. +-------------+------------------+ | Packet Size | Throughput (pps) | +-------------+------------------+ | 64 bytes | 2.989 Mpps | | 512 bytes | 2.357 Mpps | | 1518 bytes | 815.291 kpps | +-------------+------------------+ > > https://youtube.com/watch?v=cAVgvzivzII > > Jim
Important Notice: This e-mail and its contents are subject to the Nanoteq (Pty) Ltd e-mail legal notice available at: http://www.nanoteq.com/AboutUs/EmailDisclaimer.aspx _______________________________________________ freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
