On Tue, March 11, 2008 11:34 am, Fazal Ahmed Malik wrote:
> Dear All,
>
>
>
> I have FreeBSD 5.2 working as router. Now I have created vlans on freebsd
> and cisco switch. All is working perfect only problem while monitoring
> vlan
> interfaces on freebsd with snmp. When I run snmpwalk vlan interf
Dear All,
I have FreeBSD 5.2 working as router. Now I have created vlans on freebsd
and cisco switch. All is working perfect only problem while monitoring vlan
interfaces on freebsd with snmp. When I run snmpwalk vlan interface speed is
set to zero hence vlan interfaces are commented out in mrt
>If I remember correct VLANs are not
>even in ifTable, since they are not interfaces
Why not? My reading of RFC 2863's section 3.1 says that although
the VLAN multiplexing was not explicitly considered, it fits the
ifStack model perfectly, and satisfies the requirements for defining
a layer (n
At 10.10.2001, you wrote:
>On Tue, Oct 09, 2001 at 10:19:09PM -0700, Bill Fenner wrote:
>
> > (ifSpeed says "For a sub-layer which has no concept of bandwidth, this
> > object should be zero." I'd argue that this describes VLAN interfaces.)
>
>not that the vendor is always right or anything, but
< said:
> On Tue, Oct 09, 2001 at 10:19:09PM -0700, Bill Fenner wrote:
>> (ifSpeed says "For a sub-layer which has no concept of bandwidth, this
>> object should be zero." I'd argue that this describes VLAN interfaces.)
> not that the vendor is always right or anything, but at least one
> imple
On Tue, Oct 09, 2001 at 10:19:09PM -0700, Bill Fenner wrote:
> (ifSpeed says "For a sub-layer which has no concept of bandwidth, this
> object should be zero." I'd argue that this describes VLAN interfaces.)
not that the vendor is always right or anything, but at least one
implementation (junip
Bill Fenner wrote:
>>Why does vlans announce themselves as being 10 Mbits/s? I'm getting this
>>
>>from snmp on vlans that are attached to 100 Mbits/s cards.
>
>
I know that real experts can communicate in very few words, but I'd
appreciate a few more words. :-) Zero is a bit too little for
>Why does vlans announce themselves as being 10 Mbits/s? I'm getting this
>from snmp on vlans that are attached to 100 Mbits/s cards.
Because if_vlan.c calls ether_ifattach() without setting
ifp->if_baudrate?
I think "0" would be the most accurate value to return; if you
really want to know th
Why does vlans announce themselves as being 10 Mbits/s? I'm getting this
from snmp on vlans that are attached to 100 Mbits/s cards.
--
Daniel C. Sobral (8-DCS)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
You cannot kill time without injuring eterni
