On 1/30/08, Christopher Cowart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Trunking is definitely what you want. I'm using it successfully
> between Cisco switches and FreeBSD in a number of places.
>
> Here's IOS:
> | interface GigabitEthernet1/0/8
> | description dev-wireless-aux
> | switchport trunk encaps
On Wed, Jan 30, 2008 at 11:56:10AM -0200, Alexandre Biancalana wrote:
>On 1/30/08, Andrei Kolu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>Alexandre Biancalana wrote:
This server is an Dell Power Edge 1950, QuadCore 2.83, 2Gb Ram, one
bce gigabit interface connected to a gigabit port of a Cisco 4500 in
>
Alexandre Biancalana wrote:
On 1/30/08, Tom Judge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Do you have any error messages on the console in dmesg? ('cannot pad
short frame', 'unable to prepend vlan header' for example).
no :(
Sorry I'm fresh out of ideas now... Unless you could be should of ram
wha
On 1/30/08, Tom Judge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> Do you have any error messages on the console in dmesg? ('cannot pad
> >> short frame', 'unable to prepend vlan header' for example).
> >
> > no :(
>
> Sorry I'm fresh out of ideas now... Unless you could be should of ram
> what does ne
On 1/30/08, Andrei Kolu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Alexandre Biancalana wrote:
> > > This server is an Dell Power Edge 1950, QuadCore 2.83, 2Gb Ram, one
> > > bce gigabit interface connected to a gigabit port of a Cisco 4500 in
> > > trunk mode.
>
> Why you are using trunk mode? IIRC then "tr
Alexandre Biancalana wrote:
On 1/29/08, Tom Judge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Alexandre Biancalana wrote:
Hi Tom ! Thanks for your help!
I had to step back the chance an put the "old" gateway back, the
performance was unacceptable :-(
Looking closer I see that still have the problem using the
Tom Judge wrote:
> Andrei Kolu wrote:
>>> Alexandre Biancalana wrote:
This server is an Dell Power Edge 1950, QuadCore 2.83, 2Gb Ram, one
bce gigabit interface connected to a gigabit port of a Cisco 4500 in
trunk mode.
>>
>> Why you are using trunk mode? IIRC then "trunk" is used o
Andrei Kolu wrote:
Alexandre Biancalana wrote:
This server is an Dell Power Edge 1950, QuadCore 2.83, 2Gb Ram, one
bce gigabit interface connected to a gigabit port of a Cisco 4500 in
trunk mode.
Why you are using trunk mode? IIRC then "trunk" is used only between Cisco
switches and routers
> Alexandre Biancalana wrote:
> > This server is an Dell Power Edge 1950, QuadCore 2.83, 2Gb Ram, one
> > bce gigabit interface connected to a gigabit port of a Cisco 4500 in
> > trunk mode.
Why you are using trunk mode? IIRC then "trunk" is used only between Cisco
switches and routers and your
On 1/29/08, Tom Judge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Alexandre Biancalana wrote:
> > Hi Tom ! Thanks for your help!
> >
> > I had to step back the chance an put the "old" gateway back, the
> > performance was unacceptable :-(
> >
> > Looking closer I see that still have the problem using the old gat
Alexandre Biancalana wrote:
Hi Tom ! Thanks for your help!
I had to step back the chance an put the "old" gateway back, the
performance was unacceptable :-(
Looking closer I see that still have the problem using the old gateway
too, in a small scale because I only use vlan to external links.
On 1/29/08, Tom Judge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Alexandre Biancalana wrote:
> > Hi Tom ! Thanks for your help!
> >
> > I had to step back the chance an put the "old" gateway back, the
> > performance was unacceptable :-(
>
> Where these 2 systems connected to the same switch port and cabling?
>
Alexandre Biancalana wrote:
Hi Tom ! Thanks for your help!
I had to step back the chance an put the "old" gateway back, the
performance was unacceptable :-(
Where these 2 systems connected to the same switch port and cabling?
Could you post the interface error counters from the switch port?
Hi Tom ! Thanks for your help!
I had to step back the chance an put the "old" gateway back, the
performance was unacceptable :-(
Looking closer I see that still have the problem using the old gateway
too, in a small scale because I only use vlan to external links.
This old gateway is running 6.
Alexandre Biancalana wrote:
Hi list,
I changed the company gateway implementing vlan concept and now I
have a lot of slow and packet loss.
I'm running FreeBSD FW1 7.0-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 7.0-PRERELEASE #0:
Fri Jan 25 10:36:18 UTC 2008 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/FW
amd64
Hi list,
I changed the company gateway implementing vlan concept and now I
have a lot of slow and packet loss.
I'm running FreeBSD FW1 7.0-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 7.0-PRERELEASE #0:
Fri Jan 25 10:36:18 UTC 2008 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/FW
amd64
This server is an Dell Power E
Hello
I've met next problem.
There is router under freebsd with nge card as parent for several vlans.
vlan102: flags=8843 mtu 1500
inet 10.0.4.1 netmask 0xfe00 broadcast 10.0.5.255
ether 00:40:f4:47:be:10
media: Ethernet autoselect (1000baseSX )
status: active
- Original Message -
From: "Markko Merzin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Charlie Root" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 4:16 PM
Subject: Re: VLAN problems with replies to broadcast
> On Wed, 23 Oct 2002, Cha
On Wed, 23 Oct 2002, Charlie Root wrote:
> The fxp is plugged into an SMC Tigerswitch. The SMC is configured to
> pass VLAN's 5, 10 and 20.
> Can anyone suggest some tests I might try or further reading?
Try SMC Tigerswitch printed manual. Some of the Tigerswitch series models
cannot hand
We have built a machine with 3 vlan parenting off an fxp. The vlan
are bridged and vlan0 has an IP. The fxp has no IP and is excluded
from the bridge group.
** root@fw ** ~ ** Sat Oct 19 18:38:08
# ifconfig
fxp0: flags=8943 mtu 1500
ether 00:02:b3:5b:dd:98
media: Ethernet autose
On 6 Sep 2001 20:13:01 -0400, in sentex.lists.freebsd.net you wrote:
>
>So I guess this isn't a good thing.. I saw a patch for freebsd 4.2 that sets
>a bit on the card to support long frames and sets the mtu to 1500 as default
>value.. Is it available for FreeBSD 4.3 somewhere??
Either upgrade
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED]> you
write:
>
>I got fxp cards when I saw that it has native vlan support... But the problem
>is that even with this card, the mtu is set to 1496 instead of 1500...
The native VLAN support was added to the driver after 4.3 was released.
The patch for 4.2 should appl
I got fxp cards when I saw that it has native vlan support... But the problem
is that even with this card, the mtu is set to 1496 instead of 1500...
So, I tried to force it... ifconfig fpx0 mtu 1500
But there are things that starts not working... and other working...
Any email sent that is lo
23 matches
Mail list logo
