On Tue, Nov 05, 2002 at 09:05:47PM +0300, Anton Vinokurov wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I am running FreeBSD 4.7-release and try to use ATEN UC10T USB-to-Ethernet
> adapter. Unfortunately it causes my system to print something like:
> kue0: watchdog timeout
> kue0: usb error on tx: TIMEOUT
> following by freez
Hi!
I am running FreeBSD 4.7-release and try to use ATEN UC10T USB-to-Ethernet
adapter. Unfortunately it causes my system to print something like:
kue0: watchdog timeout
kue0: usb error on tx: TIMEOUT
following by freeze. I got this problem while forwarding 50pps/64kbit UDP
packet stream which com
On Wed, 2 Jan 2002, Thomas Zenker wrote:
> Hi Mike,
>
> back from holidays...
>
> because this is now discussed in different threads, on -stable and
> on -net, I will try to recapitulate what has happened and keep this
> on -net "USB ethernet problem".
>
> T
in all test cases, of course.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Mike "Silby" Silbersack
Hi Mike,
back from holidays...
because this is now discussed in different threads, on -stable and
on -net, I will try to recapitulate what has happened and keep this
on -net "USB ethernet problem"
Thomas Zenker writes:
| the situation changed, I have tried to install the new release now
| on the final embedded hardware. It is to mention, that this hardware
| is working with fbsd 4.3 from july without any problems in about
| 50 equipments. Upgrade from the previous fbsd 4.3 works flawlessly
On Fri, 21 Dec 2001, Thomas Zenker wrote:
> to follow up myself :-(
>
> the situation changed, I have tried to install the new release now
> on the final embedded hardware. It is to mention, that this hardware
> is working with fbsd 4.3 from july without any problems in about
> 50 equipments. Up
On Mon, Dec 17, 2001 at 02:35:03PM +0100, Thomas Zenker wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 17, 2001 at 03:20:51AM -0500, Mike Silbersack wrote:
> .. deleted
> >
> > RFC 2581 suggests that 4 is a good value (well, not exactly 4, they have a
> > formula which comes out to about 4 in most cases.) I'm inclined to
On Mon, Dec 17, 2001 at 03:20:51AM -0500, Mike Silbersack wrote:
.. deleted
>
> RFC 2581 suggests that 4 is a good value (well, not exactly 4, they have a
> formula which comes out to about 4 in most cases.) I'm inclined to agree
> that something between 2-4 would be a good value for our non-loc
On Mon, Dec 17, 2001 at 03:20:51AM -0500, Mike Silbersack wrote:
>
> (Moving over to -net, please remove -stable from any cc's)
>
> On Mon, 17 Dec 2001, Thomas Zenker wrote:
>
> > I allways wondered, why the initial slowstart window is set to one
> > (well some years I didn't look into the tcp
(Moving over to -net, please remove -stable from any cc's)
On Mon, 17 Dec 2001, Thomas Zenker wrote:
> I allways wondered, why the initial slowstart window is set to one
> (well some years I didn't look into the tcp code though). 9 years
> ago I had to develope the firmware for a store&foreward
10 matches
Mail list logo
