wrote:
> inline..
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Julian Elischer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2002 9:40 PM
> > To: Lars Eggert
> > Cc: Matt Impett; '[EMAIL PROTECTED]';
> > '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
&
On Thu, 27 Jun 2002, Matt Impett wrote:
> It would be nice if I could create two ng_ksockets, one bound to a divert
> port, and the other bound to inet/raw/ip, so that packets diverted to the
> divert port would get passed to the inet/raw/ip hook and go out the IP
> stack. Is this possible???
Randall Stewart wrote:
> Matt:
>
> Curiosity drives me to ask the question...
>
> Where is the Foreign agent (FA)?
>
> In most mobile IP scenarios I have been familar with (granted a
> limited set.. and I have a tiny idea of how it should work
> that may be dated) the mobile has a FA. The FA
Matt Impett wrote:
>
> inline..
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Julian Elischer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2002 9:40 PM
> > To: Lars Eggert
> > Cc: Matt Impett; '[EMAIL PROTECTED]';
> > '[EMA
inline..
> -Original Message-
> From: Julian Elischer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2002 9:40 PM
> To: Lars Eggert
> Cc: Matt Impett; '[EMAIL PROTECTED]';
> '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> Subject: Re: source address based routing
On Wed, 26 Jun 2002, Lars Eggert wrote:
> Matt Impett wrote:
> > gladly.. I am trying to implement reverse tunneling for mobile-IP. The
> > basic idea is that packets must be reverse tunneled to different IP
> > addresses depending on the source address of the packet. The reason the
> > tunne
This should almost be an FAQ...
use ipfw and the FIREWALL_FORWARD option (ipfw fwd)
to over-ride next hop routing decisions..
On Wed, 26 Jun 2002, Matt Impett wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I was wondering if it is possible to do pure source address based routing
> under FreeBSD. What I really want t
Matt Impett wrote:
> gladly.. I am trying to implement reverse tunneling for mobile-IP. The
> basic idea is that packets must be reverse tunneled to different IP
> addresses depending on the source address of the packet. The reason the
> tunnel does not have an IP address associated with it is t
Matt Impett wrote:
> I have looked at the firewall rather exetensively, but I don't know that it
> can do what I want.
Maybe you should describe what you want in a little more detail then :-)
> From what I can tell, the firewall fwd functionality allows you to redirect
> a packet to a different
Matt Impett wrote:
> I was wondering if it is possible to do pure source address based routing
> under FreeBSD. What I really want to do is route packets from particular
> source addresses to tunnels (gif devices) regardless of what the packet's
> destination address is.
Firewall forwarding will
Matt Impett wrote:
> Ok.. Modifying the ipfw stuff is where I ended up after looking at this for
> a while. I have thought about adding something like the following:
>
> ipfw add fwd-intf GIF-DEVICE all from SOURCE to any
>
> The only problem I have seen with this (besides needing to modify the
That's simple, FreeBSD can do policy based routing with ipfw.
you need to compile a kernel with:
options IPFIREWALL
options IPFIREWALL_FORWARD
myself I prefer to have these too but they're not absolutely necessary:
options IPFIREWALL_VERBOSE
options IPFIREWALL_VERB
Matt Impett wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I was wondering if it is possible to do pure source address based routing
> under FreeBSD. What I really want to do is route packets from particular
> source addresses to tunnels (gif devices) regardless of what the packet's
> destination address is.
Not yet t
Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2002 5:31 PM
> To: Matt Impett
> Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'; '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> Subject: Re: source address based routing
>
>
> Matt Impett wrote:
> > gladly.. I am trying to implement reverse tunneling for
> mobile-IP. T
Impett
> Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'; '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> Subject: Re: source address based routing
>
>
> Matt Impett wrote:
> > I was wondering if it is possible to do pure source address
> based routing
> > under FreeBSD. What I really want to
inline..
> -Original Message-
> From: Lars Eggert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2002 5:10 PM
> To: Matt Impett
> Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'; '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> Subject: Re: source address based routing
>
>
> Matt
> On Wed, 06 Jun 2001 08:38:32 -0400,
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> My question is with reference to this section.( It is possibe that the user may have
>specified un matchin source & destination addresses. eg link local source address for
>a global unicast destination address.)
Yes, th
Hi,
As you mentioned the source address selection section 1.6 in kame implementation. In
this section in the last but one paragraph the following is mentioned.
" there are some cases where we dodnot use the above rule. one example is connected
TCP session, & we use the address kept in the TCP pr
> On Wed, 06 Jun 2001 00:35:21 +0900,
> JINMEI Tatuya <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>> My doubt is this. In case a user process is specifying the source & destination
>address. Whether any check is performed on the source address like,
>> a) address is present on which interface?
>> b) addr
> On Tue, 05 Jun 2001 10:17:13 -0400,
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> My doubt is this. In case a user process is specifying the source & destination
>address. Whether any check is performed on the source address like,
> a) address is present on which interface?
> b) address is already form
20 matches
Mail list logo
