On Mon, Apr 05, 2010 at 05:54:20PM +0100, Rui Paulo wrote:
>
> On 31 Mar 2010, at 14:05, Rui Paulo wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> > I've started developing a ratectl framework for net80211, loosely
> > based on what DragonFly has. Right now only one driver has been
> > ported, but I would like your feedback
On 31 Mar 2010, at 14:05, Rui Paulo wrote:
> Hi,
> I've started developing a ratectl framework for net80211, loosely based on
> what DragonFly has. Right now only one driver has been ported, but I would
> like your feedback before continuing.
>
> The objective is to, eventually, have all the r
On 31 Mar 2010, at 18:06, Bernhard Schmidt wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 03:05:27PM +0100, Rui Paulo wrote:
>> On 31 Mar 2010, at 15:04, Bernhard Schmidt wrote:
>>
>>> On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 02:31:30PM +0100, Rui Paulo wrote:
On 31 Mar 2010, at 14:24, Antoine Brodin wrote:
> This lo
On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 03:05:27PM +0100, Rui Paulo wrote:
> On 31 Mar 2010, at 15:04, Bernhard Schmidt wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 02:31:30PM +0100, Rui Paulo wrote:
> >> On 31 Mar 2010, at 14:24, Antoine Brodin wrote:
> >>> This looks great!
> >>> Is there specific reasons to use pointe
On 31 Mar 2010, at 15:04, Bernhard Schmidt wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 02:31:30PM +0100, Rui Paulo wrote:
>> On 31 Mar 2010, at 14:24, Antoine Brodin wrote:
>>> This looks great!
>>> Is there specific reasons to use pointers and not ints for some
>>> arguments of foo_tx_complete() and foo_tx_
On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 02:31:30PM +0100, Rui Paulo wrote:
> On 31 Mar 2010, at 14:24, Antoine Brodin wrote:
> > This looks great!
> > Is there specific reasons to use pointers and not ints for some
> > arguments of foo_tx_complete() and foo_tx_update()?
>
> Not really. I'll probably switch them t
On 31 Mar 2010, at 14:24, Antoine Brodin wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 3:05 PM, Rui Paulo wrote:
>> Hi,
>> I've started developing a ratectl framework for net80211, loosely based on
>> what DragonFly has. Right now only one driver has been ported, but I would
>> like your feedback before con