Re: ipv6 routing

2010-10-01 Thread Dan Langille
On Fri, October 1, 2010 8:31 am, Hiroki Sato wrote: > "Dan Langille" wrote > in <0a85d5595ffdc548668406d3e87621c2.squir...@nyi.unixathome.org>: > > da> > Can you show the results of "ifconfig fxp1"? > da> > da> # ifconfig fxp1 > da> fxp1: flags=8843 metric 0 mtu > 1500 > da> options=9

Re: ipv6 routing

2010-10-01 Thread Hiroki Sato
"Dan Langille" wrote in <0a85d5595ffdc548668406d3e87621c2.squir...@nyi.unixathome.org>: da> > Can you show the results of "ifconfig fxp1"? da> da> # ifconfig fxp1 da> fxp1: flags=8843 metric 0 mtu 1500 da> options=9 da> ether 00:04:ac:d3:70:12 da> inet 10.55.0.1 netmask

Re: ipv6 routing

2010-10-01 Thread Dan Langille
On Fri, October 1, 2010 5:38 am, Hiroki Sato wrote: > Dan Langille wrote > in <4ca55041.7040...@langille.org>: > > da> # cat /etc/rtadvd.conf > da> fxp1:\ > da> :addrs#1:addr="2001:470:1f07:b80::":prefixlen#64:tc=ether: > > In this case, you do not need rtadvd.conf. The command line "rtad

Re: ipv6 routing

2010-10-01 Thread Hiroki Sato
Dan Langille wrote in <4ca55041.7040...@langille.org>: da> # cat /etc/rtadvd.conf da> fxp1:\ da> :addrs#1:addr="2001:470:1f07:b80::":prefixlen#64:tc=ether: In this case, you do not need rtadvd.conf. The command line "rtadvd fxp1" should work fine. da> Where: fxp1 is on my internal LAN

Re: ipv6 routing

2010-09-30 Thread Dan Langille
On 9/30/2010 11:36 PM, Dan Langille wrote: On 9/30/2010 11:06 PM, Dan Langille wrote: Hi folks, I'm setting up IPv6 at home. On the gateway, I can ping6 just fine. But not from within the LAN. I have: Routed /48: 2001:470:8a86::/48 Routed /64: 2001:470:1f07:b80::/64 On the gateway, I have th

Re: ipv6 routing

2010-09-30 Thread Dan Langille
On 9/30/2010 11:36 PM, Dan Langille wrote: On 9/30/2010 11:06 PM, Dan Langille wrote: Hi folks, I'm setting up IPv6 at home. On the gateway, I can ping6 just fine. But not from within the LAN. I have: Routed /48: 2001:470:8a86::/48 Routed /64: 2001:470:1f07:b80::/64 On the gateway, I have th

Re: ipv6 routing

2010-09-30 Thread Dan Langille
On 9/30/2010 11:06 PM, Dan Langille wrote: Hi folks, I'm setting up IPv6 at home. On the gateway, I can ping6 just fine. But not from within the LAN. I have: Routed /48: 2001:470:8a86::/48 Routed /64: 2001:470:1f07:b80::/64 On the gateway, I have this: # cat /etc/rtadvd.conf fxp1:\ :addrs#1:

Re: IPv6 routing

2009-07-02 Thread Hiroki Sato
Rob Gallagher wrote in <1d7a7b9d0907020855s469dc3f1x34e7515f1ea6e...@mail.gmail.com>: ro> The only odd thing I can see is that the machine is not getting an ro> IPv6 address on the lan-facing interface, which would explain why it ro> can't route anything. There are no issues with the sixxs tunn

Re: IPv6 routing help?

2008-12-19 Thread Ivan Voras
2008/12/19 Max Laier : > On Friday 19 December 2008 01:11:51 Ivan Voras wrote: >> Max Laier wrote: >> > On the interface you are running rtadvd you need a global address out of >> > your stf prefix, e.g. 2002:aabb:ccdd:1::/64. Once you do that, >> > everything else should just fall into place. Th

Re: IPv6 routing help?

2008-12-18 Thread Max Laier
On Friday 19 December 2008 01:11:51 Ivan Voras wrote: > Max Laier wrote: > > On the interface you are running rtadvd you need a global address out of > > your stf prefix, e.g. 2002:aabb:ccdd:1::/64. Once you do that, > > everything else should just fall into place. The client will configure > > a

Re: IPv6 routing help?

2008-12-18 Thread Ivan Voras
Max Laier wrote: > On the interface you are running rtadvd you need a global address out of your > stf prefix, e.g. 2002:aabb:ccdd:1::/64. Once you do that, everything else > should just fall into place. The client will configure an address out of > that > prefix and adds a route via 2002:aa

Re: IPv6 routing help?

2008-12-18 Thread Ivan Voras
Steve Bertrand wrote: > Ivan Voras wrote: >> Steve Bertrand wrote: >>> Ivan Voras wrote: >>> As far as I understand ipv6 (very little), this basically says the router told the client it can't send packets to outside addresses with source addresses that are link-local. Is this correct

Re: IPv6 routing help?

2008-12-18 Thread Steve Bertrand
Ivan Voras wrote: > Steve Bertrand wrote: >> Ivan Voras wrote: >> >>> As far as I understand ipv6 (very little), this basically says the >>> router told the client it can't send packets to outside addresses with >>> source addresses that are link-local. Is this correct? >> I don't know much about 6

Re: IPv6 routing help?

2008-12-18 Thread Max Laier
On Thursday 18 December 2008 23:08:12 Ivan Voras wrote: > Steve Bertrand wrote: > > Ivan Voras wrote: > >> As far as I understand ipv6 (very little), this basically says the > >> router told the client it can't send packets to outside addresses with > >> source addresses that are link-local. Is thi

Re: IPv6 routing help?

2008-12-18 Thread Ivan Voras
Steve Bertrand wrote: > Ivan Voras wrote: > >> As far as I understand ipv6 (very little), this basically says the >> router told the client it can't send packets to outside addresses with >> source addresses that are link-local. Is this correct? > > I don't know much about 6to4. All of my IPv6 is

Re: IPv6 routing help?

2008-12-18 Thread Ivan Voras
Steve Bertrand wrote: > Ivan Voras wrote: > >> The last line correctly lists the link-local ipv6 address of the router. >> This looks ok, except attempts to actually use ping6 on this address fail: >> >> # ping6 fe80::250:8bff:feeb:8401 >> connect: Invalid argument > > Oh, and I've found in the p

Re: IPv6 routing help?

2008-12-18 Thread Steve Bertrand
Ivan Voras wrote: > The last line correctly lists the link-local ipv6 address of the router. > This looks ok, except attempts to actually use ping6 on this address fail: > > # ping6 fe80::250:8bff:feeb:8401 > connect: Invalid argument Oh, and I've found in the past that FreeBSD requires you to a

Re: IPv6 routing help?

2008-12-18 Thread Steve Bertrand
Ivan Voras wrote: > As far as I understand ipv6 (very little), this basically says the > router told the client it can't send packets to outside addresses with > source addresses that are link-local. Is this correct? I don't know much about 6to4. All of my IPv6 is native, but what you are saying

Re: IPv6 routing (long)

2003-11-05 Thread paul van den bergen
On Thu, 6 Nov 2003 01:47 pm, paul van den bergen wrote: > > I know it is rather Naff replying to your own post, but I tried something > and wanted to share... and now super-naff... I made a mistake... this only works with route6d running on the central box... turn route6d off and no ping... --

Re: IPv6 routing (long)

2003-11-05 Thread paul van den bergen
On Thu, 6 Nov 2003 11:48 am, paul van den bergen wrote: > static routes. > > I imagine that if I do; > > on box1 > route add -inet6 -net fec0:0:0:2:: -prefixlen 64 -host fec0:0:0:1::2 > > on box3 > route add -inet6 -net fec0:0:0:1:: -prefixlen 64 -host fec0:0:0:2::1 > > and on box 2 > sysctl net.in

Re: IPv6 routing (long)

2003-11-05 Thread paul van den bergen
On Fri, 31 Oct 2003 04:20 pm, Bruce A. Mah wrote: > If memory serves me right, paul van den bergen wrote: > > I am attempting to set up some static ipv6 routes on my little network. > > > > example: > > > > box1 - fec0:0:0:1::1 fec0:0:0:1::2 - box 2 (router) - > > fec0:0:0:2::1 f

Re: IPv6 routing

2003-10-30 Thread Bruce A. Mah
If memory serves me right, paul van den bergen wrote: > I am attempting to set up some static ipv6 routes on my little network. > > example: > > box1 - fec0:0:0:1::1 fec0:0:0:1::2 - box 2 (router) - fec0:0:0:2:1 > fec0:0:0:2:2 - box 3 > > I want to reach from box 1 to box 3