Re: if_gif/if_bridge problem

2008-12-08 Thread Boris Kochergin
Eugene Grosbein wrote: On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 03:29:10PM -0400, Boris Kochergin wrote: #0 doadump () at /usr/src/sys/kern/kern_shutdown.c:241 241 dumptid = curthread->td_tid; (kgdb) where #0 doadump () at /usr/src/sys/kern/kern_shutdown.c:241 #1 0xc05583ef in boot (howto=260)

Re: if_gif/if_bridge problem

2008-10-23 Thread Eugene Grosbein
On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 03:29:10PM -0400, Boris Kochergin wrote: > #0 doadump () at /usr/src/sys/kern/kern_shutdown.c:241 > 241 dumptid = curthread->td_tid; > (kgdb) where > #0 doadump () at /usr/src/sys/kern/kern_shutdown.c:241 > #1 0xc05583ef in boot (howto=260) at /usr/src/sys/ke

Re: if_gif/if_bridge problem

2008-10-23 Thread Boris Kochergin
Eugene Grosbein wrote: On Thu, Sep 04, 2008 at 11:49:06AM -0400, Boris Kochergin wrote: Ahoy. I've been using the patch for a while, and, recently, when the load on the wireless network I needed it for has increased, I've started getting kernel panics that I think the patch is responsible f

Re: if_gif/if_bridge problem

2008-09-04 Thread Eugene Grosbein
On Thu, Sep 04, 2008 at 10:00:17AM -0700, Andrew Thompson wrote: > Im not too sure about adding media attachments to the bridge. I have > long forgotten the network layout you are trying to achieve, can you > describe it again. Just to aggregate two bridges with lagg(4) > It may be better to all

Re: if_gif/if_bridge problem

2008-09-04 Thread Andrew Thompson
On Fri, Sep 05, 2008 at 12:49:49AM +0800, Eugene Grosbein wrote: > On Thu, Sep 04, 2008 at 11:49:06AM -0400, Boris Kochergin wrote: > > > Ahoy. I've been using the patch for a while, and, recently, when the > > load on the wireless network I needed it for has increased, I've started > > getting

Re: if_gif/if_bridge problem

2008-09-04 Thread Eugene Grosbein
On Thu, Sep 04, 2008 at 11:49:06AM -0400, Boris Kochergin wrote: > Ahoy. I've been using the patch for a while, and, recently, when the > load on the wireless network I needed it for has increased, I've started > getting kernel panics that I think the patch is responsible for. The > panics are

Re: if_gif/if_bridge problem

2008-09-04 Thread Boris Kochergin
Eugene Grosbein wrote: Eugene, I take it the fix that applies on Boris's case is the M_BCAST|M_MCAST setting on the mbuf? I would like to test/commit this. I see you have already got it :-) Also, why to you add support for adding a bridge to a lagg interface? I needed to force

Re: if_gif/if_bridge problem

2008-02-26 Thread Eugene Grosbein
> Eugene, I take it the fix that applies on Boris's case is the > M_BCAST|M_MCAST setting on the mbuf? I would like to test/commit this. I see you have already got it :-) > Also, why to you add support for adding a bridge to a lagg interface? I needed to force lagg(4) to aggregate two EtherIP tu

Re: if_gif/if_bridge problem

2008-02-26 Thread Andrew Thompson
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 11:51:38AM -0500, Boris Kochergin wrote: > Eugene Grosbein wrote: >> On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 09:57:48AM -0500, Boris Kochergin wrote: >> >> >>> bridge0: flags=8843 metric 0 mtu >>> 1500 >>>ether 3e:7f:e8:ef:f6:a4 >>>inet 192.168.0.1 netmask 0xff00 bro

Re: if_gif/if_bridge problem

2008-02-26 Thread Boris Kochergin
Eugene Grosbein wrote: On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 09:57:48AM -0500, Boris Kochergin wrote: bridge0: flags=8843 metric 0 mtu 1500 ether 3e:7f:e8:ef:f6:a4 inet 192.168.0.1 netmask 0xff00 broadcast 192.168.0.255 id 00:00:00:00:00:00 priority 32768 hellotime 2 fwddelay 15

Re: if_gif/if_bridge problem

2008-02-26 Thread Eugene Grosbein
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 09:57:48AM -0500, Boris Kochergin wrote: > bridge0: flags=8843 metric 0 mtu > 1500 >ether 3e:7f:e8:ef:f6:a4 >inet 192.168.0.1 netmask 0xff00 broadcast 192.168.0.255 >id 00:00:00:00:00:00 priority 32768 hellotime 2 fwddelay 15 >maxage 20