On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 11:51:38AM -0500, Boris Kochergin wrote: > Eugene Grosbein wrote: >> On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 09:57:48AM -0500, Boris Kochergin wrote: >> >> >>> bridge0: flags=8843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> metric 0 mtu >>> 1500 >>> ether 3e:7f:e8:ef:f6:a4 >>> inet 192.168.0.1 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 192.168.0.255 >>> id 00:00:00:00:00:00 priority 32768 hellotime 2 fwddelay 15 >>> maxage 20 holdcnt 6 proto rstp maxaddr 100 timeout 1200 >>> root id 00:00:00:00:00:00 priority 32768 ifcost 0 port 0 >>> member: gif6 flags=143<LEARNING,DISCOVER,AUTOEDGE,AUTOPTP> >>> >> >> [skip] >> >> >>> So, the tunnels and bridges appear to be sending the traffic around >>> properly, but the concentrator machine isn't replying to ARP requests for >>> its bridge0 interface's IP. This is where I'm stuck. Any help is >>> appreciated. >>> >> >> The problem is that if_bridge(4) won't work this way - with only one >> gif-member >> without patching. I've faced this recently and debugged it in detail. >> Then I've produced a patch and now I run it over a month in production >> without a problem: >> >> ftp://www.kuzbass.ru/pub/freebsd/lagg-0.1.tgz >> > > I just tested it on my 7.0-RC1 setup and it did indeed take care of the > problem. Thank you very much!
Eugene, I take it the fix that applies on Boris's case is the M_BCAST|M_MCAST setting on the mbuf? I would like to test/commit this. Also, why to you add support for adding a bridge to a lagg interface? regards, Andrew _______________________________________________ freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
