The obscure answer has to do with what the L2 adjacency stuff is doing.
Because it adds that default route out a specific interface, it will
send ARP requests out that. Even if the other interface goes down,
it'll still throw them out that interface.
It's just a side effect of how the L2 adjacenc
In message
, Kevin Oberman wrote:
>To use WPA and a static address, you need something like:
>ifconfig_wlan0 ="WPA inet 192.168.1.21/24"
>so that was OK.
Yea, actually I did already have the static+WPA working.
>Now, you seem to have both interfaces on the same /24 with a /24
>netmask. This i
On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 1:19 AM, Ronald F. Guilmette
wrote:
>
> In message
>
> , you wrote:
>
>>for wifi - you need to configure /etc/wpa_supplicant.conf as well,
>>right?
>
> Did that. Yes.
>
>>You don't need the ssid in the ifconfig line;
>
> OK. If you say so. (See my prior e-mail where I
In message
, you wrote:
>for wifi - you need to configure /etc/wpa_supplicant.conf as well,
>right?
Did that. Yes.
>You don't need the ssid in the ifconfig line;
OK. If you say so. (See my prior e-mail where I wondered aloud if there
are circumstances where the ssid might have to appear i
In message
, you wrote:
>I wrote:
>> P.S. Actually, I've never tried running _both_ the wired & wireless stuff
>> on this laptop in parallel before now. Is that part of the problem? And
>> anyway, how exactly does the system establish a default route to 192.168.1.1
>> when there are two (or m
for wifi - you need to configure /etc/wpa_supplicant.conf as well,
right? You don't need the ssid in the ifconfig line; wpa_supplicant
will scan and find your AP.
The driver should call back to non-n and non-g if needs be.
As for the config - erm, you have two interfaces on the same L2.
That's go
On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 8:18 PM, Ronald F. Guilmette
wrote:
>
>
> Greerings,
>
> I am currently running 9.1-RC2 on my laptop, and I'm wondering what the
> proper procedure is for reporting bugs in not-yet-released releases.
> Could somebody please tell me? Should I just file a regular PR? (I've
That looks like a more general problem. None of those locks are
net80211/ath locks.
Adrian
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.
Áõ¿ wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Recently I've got 802.11b/g adapter TL-WN353GD from TP-Link, based on
> Atheros AR5008 chip.It's a 802.11n NIC.
>
> I can make it work in mode 11g in stead of 11n with the FreeBSD 8.0 current.
> So,I have a question that whether there is support for 802.11n in FreeBSD
>
On Sun, Jun 21, 2009 at 12:16:47AM +0400, Pavel Gubin wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Recently I've got 802.11b/g adapter TL-WN353GD from TP-Link, based on
> Realtek RTL8185L chip.
>
> Seems that there is no support for it in FreeBSD yet, but there are some
> mentionings about 8185 in /sys/dev/usb/wlan/if_u
On Tue, 26 May 2009, Brooks Davis wrote:
> On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 08:06:25PM +1000, Ian Smith wrote:
> > On Sun, 24 May 2009, Rui Paulo wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > > If anyone is interested in testing out wireless mesh networking under
> > > FreeBSD, the project has now reached a point where you
On 26 May 2009, at 11:06, Ian Smith wrote:
On Sun, 24 May 2009, Rui Paulo wrote:
Hi,
If anyone is interested in testing out wireless mesh networking under
FreeBSD, the project has now reached a point where you can transfer
packets between mesh nodes.
Always a good point to celebrate :)
I tr
On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 08:06:25PM +1000, Ian Smith wrote:
> On Sun, 24 May 2009, Rui Paulo wrote:
> > Hi,
> > If anyone is interested in testing out wireless mesh networking under
> > FreeBSD, the project has now reached a point where you can transfer
> > packets between mesh nodes.
>
> Alway
On Sun, 24 May 2009, Rui Paulo wrote:
> Hi,
> If anyone is interested in testing out wireless mesh networking under
> FreeBSD, the project has now reached a point where you can transfer
> packets between mesh nodes.
Always a good point to celebrate :)
> I try to keep the branch in sync with
Hi,
On 25 May 2009, at 09:07, Ivo Vachkov wrote:
Hello,
Great project! But could you please elaborate on technologies being
used in it?
Here's some background:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IEEE_802.11s
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wireless_mesh_network
http://www.cs.wustl.edu/~jain/cse574-
Hello,
Great project! But could you please elaborate on technologies being used in it?
Thank you very much in advance.
On Sun, May 24, 2009 at 2:51 PM, Rui Paulo wrote:
> Hi,
> If anyone is interested in testing out wireless mesh networking under
> FreeBSD, the project has now reached a point
On Wednesday 19 March 2008 13:35:22 Benjamin Close wrote:
> Yousif Hassan wrote:
> > Benjamin Close wrote:
> >> Sam Leffler wrote:
> >>> Yousif Hassan wrote:
> On Wed, 2008-03-12 at 08:06 +1030, Benjamin Close wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> The slightly wonky:
> - As reported by someone else:
Yousif Hassan wrote:
Benjamin Close wrote:
Sam Leffler wrote:
Yousif Hassan wrote:
On Wed, 2008-03-12 at 08:06 +1030, Benjamin Close wrote:
The slightly wonky:
- As reported by someone else:
wpi0: timeout resetting Tx ring 1
wpi0: timeout resetting Tx ring 3
wpi0: timeout resetting
Benjamin Close wrote:
Sam Leffler wrote:
Yousif Hassan wrote:
On Wed, 2008-03-12 at 08:06 +1030, Benjamin Close wrote:
The slightly wonky:
- As reported by someone else:
wpi0: timeout resetting Tx ring 1
wpi0: timeout resetting Tx ring 3
wpi0: timeout resetting Tx ring 4
appear on st
Sam Leffler wrote:
Yousif Hassan wrote:
On Wed, 2008-03-12 at 08:06 +1030, Benjamin Close wrote:
Alphons "Fonz" van Werven wrote:
Mel wrote:
Do the recent patches by Andrew make a difference?
http://people.freebsd.org/~thompsa/wpi_head.diff
http://people.freebsd.org/~thompsa
Yousif Hassan wrote:
On Wed, 2008-03-12 at 08:06 +1030, Benjamin Close wrote:
Alphons "Fonz" van Werven wrote:
Mel wrote:
Do the recent patches by Andrew make a difference?
http://people.freebsd.org/~thompsa/wpi_head.diff
http://people.freebsd.org/~thompsa/wpi_releng7.diff
On Wed, 2008-03-12 at 08:06 +1030, Benjamin Close wrote:
> Alphons "Fonz" van Werven wrote:
> > Mel wrote:
> >
> >>> Do the recent patches by Andrew make a difference?
> >>>
> >>> http://people.freebsd.org/~thompsa/wpi_head.diff
> >>> http://people.freebsd.org/~thompsa/wpi_releng7.diff
> >
(c
On Sun, 10 Feb 2008 19:55:23 -0500, Michael C. Cambria wrote
> I have quite a few Soekris machines as wireless AP's using the
> PCMCIA NL-2511 CD EXT card (wi0 in hostap mode) found at Netgate. I
> also have a desktop with a similar setup, to debug prior to flashing
> for Soekris. All run Fre
On Sun, 10 Feb 2008 19:55:23 -0500, Michael C. Cambria wrote
> I have quite a few Soekris machines as wireless AP's using the
> PCMCIA NL-2511 CD EXT card (wi0 in hostap mode) found at Netgate. I
> also have a desktop with a similar setup, to debug prior to flashing
> for Soekris. All run Fre
Cristian KLEIN a écrit :
> Marc G. Fournier wrote:
>
>> I'm looking to do some consulting on a project that will involve wireless
>> networks ... since, if it goes forward, I'm going to be the "Unix person",
>> so,
>> of course, the unix side will be FreeBSD ...
>>
>> ... but, I haven't used
Marc G. Fournier wrote:
>
> I'm looking to do some consulting on a project that will involve wireless
> networks ... since, if it goes forward, I'm going to be the "Unix person",
> so,
> of course, the unix side will be FreeBSD ...
>
> ... but, I haven't used wireless at all under FreeBSD ...
0n Thu, Oct 11, 2007 at 10:18:34PM -0300, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
>... but, I haven't used wireless at all under FreeBSD ... what do we
support
>*well*? The machine(s) are going to be remote, so I'd like to go with
>something that is generally felt to be 'consistently reliable
On 3/10/07, Yuri Lukin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Fri, 9 Mar 2007 14:10:45 +1100, Sam Wun wrote
> Hi,
>
> About half year ago, I tested a mini wireless server card with
> FreeBSD 6. The connection runs very fast if only myself using it,
> but when there are more than 1 user connected to it,
On Fri, 9 Mar 2007 14:10:45 +1100, Sam Wun wrote
> Hi,
>
> About half year ago, I tested a mini wireless server card with
> FreeBSD 6. The connection runs very fast if only myself using it,
> but when there are more than 1 user connected to it, the second
> user will suffer extremely slow wirel
On 1/16/07, Lars Stokholm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> There's *one* other card on the list that seems perfect for me:
>
>
http://www.gigabyte.com.tw/Products/Communication/Products_Spec.aspx?ProductID=988&ProductName=GN-WP01GT
>
> http://edbpriser.dk/Products/Listprices.asp?ID=249274
>
> 1.0 -
Lars Stokholm wrote:
http://customerproducts.atheros.com/customerproducts/default.asp
Wow, I actually think I found a card there, that is guaranteed to
work. Is this really the end of all my struggles? :) For only 50 USD.
There seem to be only one version of the card.
http://www.dlink.com/
On 1/15/07, Sam Leffler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
John Nielsen wrote:
> On Monday 15 January 2007 15:54, Lars Stokholm wrote:
>> John Nielsen wrote:
>>> On Monday 15 January 2007 12:54, Lars Stokholm wrote:
Hi, I hope someone can help me with this, before I go mad (no pun
intended.) :)
John Nielsen wrote:
> On Monday 15 January 2007 15:54, Lars Stokholm wrote:
>> John Nielsen wrote:
>>> On Monday 15 January 2007 12:54, Lars Stokholm wrote:
Hi, I hope someone can help me with this, before I go mad (no pun
intended.) :)
I was initially looking for a relatively c
On Monday 15 January 2007 15:54, Lars Stokholm wrote:
> John Nielsen wrote:
> > On Monday 15 January 2007 12:54, Lars Stokholm wrote:
> >> Hi, I hope someone can help me with this, before I go mad (no pun
> >> intended.) :)
> >>
> >> I was initially looking for a relatively cheap 54Mbps, 802.11g- a
Lars Stokholm wrote:
John Nielsen wrote:
On Monday 15 January 2007 12:54, Lars Stokholm wrote:
Hi, I hope someone can help me with this, before I go mad (no pun
intended.) :)
I was initially looking for a relatively cheap 54Mbps, 802.11g- and
WPA-capable network card, based on an Atheros chips
John Nielsen wrote:
On Monday 15 January 2007 12:54, Lars Stokholm wrote:
Hi, I hope someone can help me with this, before I go mad (no pun
intended.) :)
I was initially looking for a relatively cheap 54Mbps, 802.11g- and
WPA-capable network card, based on an Atheros chipset, but after
spending
On Mon, Jan 15, 2007 at 08:44:54PM +0100, Lars Stokholm wrote:
> John Nielsen wrote:
> >On Monday 15 January 2007 13:44, John Nielsen wrote:
> >
> >>On Monday 15 January 2007 12:54, Lars Stokholm wrote:
> >>
> >>>Hi, I hope someone can help me with this, before I go mad (no pun
> >>>intended.
Lars Stokholm wrote:
John Nielsen wrote:
On Monday 15 January 2007 13:44, John Nielsen wrote:
On Monday 15 January 2007 12:54, Lars Stokholm wrote:
Hi, I hope someone can help me with this, before I go mad (no pun
intended.) :)
I was initially looking for a relatively cheap 54Mbps, 802.
Andrew Thompson wrote:
On Mon, Jan 15, 2007 at 08:44:54PM +0100, Lars Stokholm wrote:
John Nielsen wrote:
On Monday 15 January 2007 13:44, John Nielsen wrote:
On Monday 15 January 2007 12:54, Lars Stokholm wrote:
Hi, I hope someone can help me with this, before I
Lars Stokholm wrote:
John Nielsen wrote:
On Monday 15 January 2007 13:44, John Nielsen wrote:
On Monday 15 January 2007 12:54, Lars Stokholm wrote:
Hi, I hope someone can help me with this, before I go mad (no pun
intended.) :)
I was initially looking for a relatively cheap 54Mbps, 802.
Lars Stokholm wrote:
> Lars Stokholm wrote:
>> Hi, I hope someone can help me with this, before I go mad (no pun
>> intended.) :)
>>
>> I was initially looking for a relatively cheap 54Mbps, 802.11g- and
>> WPA-capable network card, based on an Atheros chipset, but after
>> spending the whole of la
John Nielsen wrote:
On Monday 15 January 2007 13:44, John Nielsen wrote:
On Monday 15 January 2007 12:54, Lars Stokholm wrote:
Hi, I hope someone can help me with this, before I go mad (no pun
intended.) :)
I was initially looking for a relatively cheap 54Mbps, 802.11g- and
WPA-capable network
John Nielsen wrote:
On Monday 15 January 2007 13:44, John Nielsen wrote:
On Monday 15 January 2007 12:54, Lars Stokholm wrote:
Hi, I hope someone can help me with this, before I go mad (no pun
intended.) :)
I was initially looking for a relatively cheap 54Mbps, 802.11g- and
WPA-capable
On Monday 15 January 2007 13:44, John Nielsen wrote:
> On Monday 15 January 2007 12:54, Lars Stokholm wrote:
> > Hi, I hope someone can help me with this, before I go mad (no pun
> > intended.) :)
> >
> > I was initially looking for a relatively cheap 54Mbps, 802.11g- and
> > WPA-capable network ca
On Monday 15 January 2007 12:54, Lars Stokholm wrote:
> Hi, I hope someone can help me with this, before I go mad (no pun
> intended.) :)
>
> I was initially looking for a relatively cheap 54Mbps, 802.11g- and
> WPA-capable network card, based on an Atheros chipset, but after
> spending the whole o
Lars Stokholm wrote:
Hi, I hope someone can help me with this, before I go mad (no pun
intended.) :)
I was initially looking for a relatively cheap 54Mbps, 802.11g- and
WPA-capable network card, based on an Atheros chipset, but after
spending the whole of last night looking for one - to no av
Kan Cai wrote:
On Sat, 18 Mar 2006, Bruce M Simpson wrote:
On Fri, Mar 17, 2006 at 02:00:28PM -0800, Kan Cai wrote:
I wonder if this is true that sensing function is missing? If yes,
is it
supposed to be implemented in the driver or net80211 layer? Thanks in
advance!
It's a function of
On Sat, 18 Mar 2006, Bruce M Simpson wrote:
On Fri, Mar 17, 2006 at 02:00:28PM -0800, Kan Cai wrote:
I wonder if this is true that sensing function is missing? If yes, is it
supposed to be implemented in the driver or net80211 layer? Thanks in
advance!
It's a function of the 802.11 hardwa
On Fri, Mar 17, 2006 at 02:00:28PM -0800, Kan Cai wrote:
> I wonder if this is true that sensing function is missing? If yes, is it
> supposed to be implemented in the driver or net80211 layer? Thanks in
> advance!
It's a function of the 802.11 hardware. I assume you're describing the
CSMA/CA
On Monday 20 February 2006 21:48, Andreas Lattka wrote:
> I am using the Netgear WG511 v2 with NDIS drivers, works without any
> problem.
>
> Andreas
>
Thanks for suggestion, I bought NETGEAR WG511 and successfully made NDIS
driver with ndisgen and ndiscvt utilities and then recompiled kernel. Ca
I am using the Netgear WG511 v2 with NDIS drivers, works without any
problem.
Andreas
Am Montag, den 20.02.2006, 09:33 +0100 schrieb Alexander Konovalenko:
> Hi,
>
> Can somebody recommend me what pc-card or UBS adapter I shall buy for my
> FreeBSD 6.0 laptop? I am not sure what is supported a
Lukas Muehlethaler wrote:
I want to buy a wireless PCI adapter for a machine running FreeBSD 6.0.
After reading the archives, man pages, etc. I realized that his is a
tricky business. Some of the adaptors listed as supported have now a
different chipset. For example, Netgear WG311T now has the
On Tue, Nov 29, 2005 at 07:42:52PM -0600, Douglass, Erik wrote:
> Broadcom 1370 on a Dell D610.. Anyone have any luck with this?? Not
> seeing any wi* entries in ifconfig. Using FreeBSD 6.0
We have no native support for broadcom wireless devices (the wouldn't
be wi(4) anyway since we aren't Lin
On Sun, Jun 20, 2004 at 08:30:04PM +0200, Stefan E?er wrote:
> On 2004-06-20 14:54 +0100, Josef Karthauser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Sun, Jun 20, 2004 at 02:39:36PM +0100, Josef Karthauser wrote:
> > > The ath manual pages says that we support the Netgear WG311 and the
> > > WG511T, but do
On Sun, Jun 20, 2004 at 06:52:05PM +0100, David Malone wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 20, 2004 at 02:54:34PM +0100, Josef Karthauser wrote:
> > I should have said that the atheros web site states that the 511T and
> > the 311T use the same chipset, which is the AR5002G, but that the
>
> I know someone with
All Atheros h/w is supported by the current ath driver or works with
the patches in http://www.freebsd.org/~sam. When I put out the
original patches I got zero feedback so didn't commit the changes. Now
I've got no time and they changes are so out of date that there's
little point in committi
On 2004-06-20 14:54 +0100, Josef Karthauser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 20, 2004 at 02:39:36PM +0100, Josef Karthauser wrote:
> > The ath manual pages says that we support the Netgear WG311 and the
> > WG511T, but do we also support the WG311T? (Is the T significant?).
AFAIK, the WG3
On Sun, Jun 20, 2004 at 02:54:34PM +0100, Josef Karthauser wrote:
> I should have said that the atheros web site states that the 511T and
> the 311T use the same chipset, which is the AR5002G, but that the
I know someone with a 511T, and it works with the ath driver, I
believe. I also have a WAG5
On Sun, Jun 20, 2004 at 02:39:36PM +0100, Josef Karthauser wrote:
> Dear wireless geeks,
>
> The ath manual pages says that we support the Netgear WG311 and the
> WG511T, but do we also support the WG311T? (Is the T significant?).
>
> Many thanks if you know the answer to this question.
I shoul
Thank you very much for your replysee below
On Thursday 06 May 2004 15:01, Marco Molteni wrote:
> Hi Juan,
>
> On Thu, 6 May 2004 Juan Rodriguez Hervella <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I'd like to try on some changes that I've made in our VoIP
> > testbed for mobility support at
Hi Juan,
On Thu, 6 May 2004 Juan Rodriguez Hervella <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'd like to try on some changes that I've made in our VoIP
> testbed for mobility support at the application layer.
>
> If the user requires support for seamless voice communication during
> active call
Gareth Bailey wrote:
Does anyone know how to configure FreeBSD to use a wireless USB WLAN adapter. The adapter is a X-Micro WLAN USB adapter.
When i plug it into FreeBSD i get a "ugen0" device loaded message. I understand this means that the OS doesn't specifically recognise it as a WIFI adapter,
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, February 17, 2004 2:02 PM
Subject: Re: wireless D-link DWL-G650 A1
> > Fabrizio Parrella (by way of Fabrizio Parrella<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>)
<>
> > scribbled on 16. februar 2004 15:40:
> >
> >>
EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, February 17, 2004 2:02 PM
Subject: Re: wireless D-link DWL-G650 A1
> > Fabrizio Parrella (by way of Fabrizio Parrella<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>)
<>
> > scribbled on 16. februar 2004 15:40:
> >
> >> HI
Fabrizio Parrella (by way of Fabrizio Parrella<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) <>
scribbled on 16. februar 2004 15:40:
HI! I have the wireless card D-Link DWL-G650 A1 wireless and I need
the info
to make it works with FreeBSD5.2..
any suggestions?
All I needed for my D-Link DWL-AG650 to work was this:
de
Fabrizio Parrella (by way of Fabrizio Parrella<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) <>
scribbled on 16. februar 2004 15:40:
> HI! I have the wireless card D-Link DWL-G650 A1 wireless and I need
> the info
> to make it works with FreeBSD5.2..
>
> any suggestions?
All I needed for my D-Link DWL-AG650 to work was t
On Tue, Jan 06, 2004 at 03:35:40PM +1100, paul van den bergen wrote:
> OK ok, if one could just see what other devices were out there it would be a
> good start I suppose.
I suggest you have a look at the WirelessLeiden and IEEE 802.11 MIBs. Some
weeks ago I reviewed these for applicability to Fre
On Tue, 6 Jan 2004 03:13 pm, you wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 06, 2004 at 12:16:47PM +1100, paul van den bergen wrote:
> > How about snmp information display programs for FreeBSD?
>
> I'm working on something like this. What exactly do you want to measure
> or monitor?
Ah! yes... see, now there is the rub
On Tue, Jan 06, 2004 at 12:16:47PM +1100, paul van den bergen wrote:
> How about snmp information display programs for FreeBSD?
I'm working on something like this. What exactly do you want to measure
or monitor?
BMS
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
ht
On Mon, 15 Dec 2003 05:03 pm, Randy Bush wrote:
> most APs have snmp
sorry for the delayed response, I've been away :-)
as usual, answers raise more questions... and another hole in my knowledge
snmp = simple network management protocol, I presume, and allows network
state data to be transp
On Mon, Dec 15, 2003 at 04:56:44PM +1100, paul van den bergen wrote:
> What tools are there in BSD-land that are usefull for monitoring activity on
> an AP? i.e. like dstumbler but from the LAN side? well, alright, not like
> dstumbler as it has 1) and installed piece of hardware to use and 2) di
most APs have snmp
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
If you grovel up a PCI card with a PCMCIA slot, you may be all set (I
haven't tried the Netgear). This is, in fact, the way the 'PCI' version of
the Lucent card is sold.
I'm sorry to make a plug on the list, but I think these guys are cool
(YMMV), and they can sell you such a card for $40:
http://
On Sun, 08 Jun 2003 20:27:09 -0400
User Kseel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Also, does anyone have any suggestions on a really good card?
> In terms of :
> 1) Good pigtail connector.
> 2) Highest mw power output allowed.
> 3) Good driver support in FreeBSD.
>
www.netgate.com sells some good
Did you ever get the AP going on the PCI bridge thingey? I have a
PCMCIA -> ISA bridge and a USR 240X running as AP just fine,
_but_ some things could be better ...
1) the ISA bus limitations effectively cap performance at 5 Mb/sec.
2) The card doesn't have a pigtail adapter, I have some fancy
75 matches
Mail list logo
