25.10.2011 11:21, Sergey Saley ???:
Jack Vogel wrote:
On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 12:22 AM, Sergey Saleywrote:
Ryan Stone-2 wrote:
On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 3:51 PM, Sergey Saley
wrote:
MPD5, netgraph, pppoe.Types of traffic - any (customer traffic).
Bying this car
Hi!
To be continued...
I replaced 82598 (2 cx4 ports) with 82599 (2 sfp+ ports) without any
configuration changes.
The same host, same system, same tuning, same load and traffic.
Was (82598):
# vmstat -i
interrupt total rate
irq19: atapci0 166711
Jack Vogel wrote:
>
> On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 12:22 AM, Sergey Saley wrote:
>
>>
>> Ryan Stone-2 wrote:
>> >
>> > On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 3:51 PM, Sergey Saley
>> wrote:
>> >> MPD5, netgraph, pppoe.Types of traffic - any (customer traffic).
>> >> Bying this card I co
On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 12:22 AM, Sergey Saley wrote:
>
> Ryan Stone-2 wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 3:51 PM, Sergey Saley
> wrote:
> >> MPD5, netgraph, pppoe.Types of traffic - any (customer traffic).
> >> Bying this card I counted on a 3-4G traffic at 3-4K pppoe sessions.
Ryan Stone-2 wrote:
>
> On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 3:51 PM, Sergey Saley wrote:
>> MPD5, netgraph, pppoe.Types of traffic - any (customer traffic).
>> Bying this card I counted on a 3-4G traffic at 3-4K pppoe sessions.
>> It turned to 600-700Mbit/s, about 50K pps at 700-800 pppoe sess
Arnaud Lacombe-6 wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 4:32 PM, Ryan Stone wrote:
>> On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 3:51 PM, Sergey Saley wrote:
>>> MPD5, netgraph, pppoe.Types of traffic - any (customer traffic).
>>> Bying this card I counted on a 3-4G traffic at 3-4K pp
Hi,
On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 4:32 PM, Ryan Stone wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 3:51 PM, Sergey Saley wrote:
>> MPD5, netgraph, pppoe.Types of traffic - any (customer traffic).
>> Bying this card I counted on a 3-4G traffic at 3-4K pppoe sessions.
>> It turned to 600-700Mbit/s, about 50K pps at
On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 3:51 PM, Sergey Saley wrote:
> MPD5, netgraph, pppoe.Types of traffic - any (customer traffic).
> Bying this card I counted on a 3-4G traffic at 3-4K pppoe sessions.
> It turned to 600-700Mbit/s, about 50K pps at 700-800 pppoe sessions.
PPPoE is your problem. The Intel ca
You could try this patch. It disables the interrupt while it's being handled.
(The driver already re-enables it at the end of the handler and the task.)
-Andrew
Index: sys/dev/ixgbe/ixgbe.c
===
--- sys/dev/ixgbe/ixgbe.c (rev
Ryan Stone-2 wrote:
>
> On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 3:08 PM, Sergey Saley wrote:
>> Nothing has changed after increasing mbufs count increasing:
>>
>> irq256: ix0:que 0 3013004 2431
>> irq257: ix0:que 1 970295 783
>> irq258: ix0:que 2
On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 3:08 PM, Sergey Saley wrote:
> Nothing has changed after increasing mbufs count increasing:
>
> irq256: ix0:que 0 3013004 2431
> irq257: ix0:que 1 970295 783
> irq258: ix0:que 2 574782 463
> irq259: ix0:que
Jack Vogel wrote:
>
> On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 10:46 AM, Sergey Saley wrote:
>
>>
>> Jack Vogel wrote:
>> >
>> > You need to increase your mbuf pool, note below in your messages where
>> it
>> > has
>> > insufficient to configure for ix1, I don't know that this will change
>> the
>>
On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 10:46 AM, Sergey Saley wrote:
>
> Jack Vogel wrote:
> >
> > You need to increase your mbuf pool, note below in your messages where it
> > has
> > insufficient to configure for ix1, I don't know that this will change the
> > interrupt
> > difference but it should be addresse
Jack Vogel wrote:
>
> You need to increase your mbuf pool, note below in your messages where it
> has
> insufficient to configure for ix1, I don't know that this will change the
> interrupt
> difference but it should be addressed anyway.
>
Thank You for answer!
Nobody's fault but mine :-(
Being
You need to increase your mbuf pool, note below in your messages where it
has
insufficient to configure for ix1, I don't know that this will change the
interrupt
difference but it should be addressed anyway.
I also noticed that you have the adapter in a PCIE 1.0 slot (only 2.5 Gb/s),
that
will lim
15 matches
Mail list logo