Jack Vogel wrote: > > On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 10:46 AM, Sergey Saley <sergeysaley@>wrote: > >> >> Jack Vogel wrote: >> > >> > You need to increase your mbuf pool, note below in your messages where >> it >> > has >> > insufficient to configure for ix1, I don't know that this will change >> the >> > interrupt >> > difference but it should be addressed anyway. >> > >> >> >
Nothing has changed after increasing mbufs count increasing: irq256: ix0:que 0 3013004 2431 irq257: ix0:que 1 970295 783 irq258: ix0:que 2 574782 463 irq259: ix0:que 3 520764 420 irq260: ix0:link 1 0 irq261: ix1:que 0 3185946 2571 irq262: ix1:que 1 20425 16 irq263: ix1:que 2 10098 8 irq264: ix1:que 3 6999 5 irq265: ix1:link 3 0 Still only one irq being really used for ix1... -- View this message in context: http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/Too-much-interrupts-on-ixgbe-tp4931883p4933765.html Sent from the freebsd-net mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
