JINMEI Tatuya / [EMAIL PROTECTED]@C#:H wrote:
> That's a good news, but do you mean the panic you mentioned before
> (copied below)?
Yes. It still hasn't happened in a long time, so even if it's coincidence,
I'll take it. :)
Doug
--
This .signature sanitized for your protection
> On Sun, 12 Feb 2006 14:56:44 -0800,
> Doug Barton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>> Could you try the patch attached below?
> I probably should have mentioned this earlier, but I started testing this
> patch on HEAD and RELENG_6 shortly after you sent it, and I haven't been
> able to repr
JINMEI Tatuya / [EMAIL PROTECTED]@C#:H wrote:
> Could you try the patch attached below?
I probably should have mentioned this earlier, but I started testing this
patch on HEAD and RELENG_6 shortly after you sent it, and I haven't been
able to reproduce the panic I was seeing, either accidental
Hi,
>>> Sun, 12 Feb 2006 16:11:28 +0900 の刻に「jinmei」、すなわち
>>> JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 氏曰く
> On Sun, 12 Feb 2006 01:58:28 -0500,
> Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>> Are you sure you applied the patch? In the 'patched' version of
>> nd6.c, line 585 is blank, so a
> On Sun, 12 Feb 2006 01:58:28 -0500,
> Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>> Are you sure you applied the patch? In the 'patched' version of
>> nd6.c, line 585 is blank, so at least it doesn't match the above
>> backtrace.
> Sorry, you're right - what was happening was that I'd ap
On Sat, Feb 11, 2006 at 04:31:23PM +0900, JINMEI Tatuya / [EMAIL
PROTECTED]@C#:H wrote:
> > On Sat, 11 Feb 2006 02:14:11 -0500,
> > Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
> >> >> Sorry, not really (we've not got a test environment to reproduce it).
> >> >> But from a quick review of n
On Tue, Feb 07, 2006 at 12:45:02AM -0500, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> Has anyone looked at this? This is on the TODO list for 6.1, so the
> sooner it can be resolved the better.
I wonder if a lot of these panics are related to races on the
in6_ifaddr variable? Access to it is unsynchronised currently,
> On Sat, 11 Feb 2006 02:14:11 -0500,
> Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>> >> Sorry, not really (we've not got a test environment to reproduce it).
>> >> But from a quick review of nd6.c, there seems to be one thing that is
>> >> obviously wrong. The possible bug has been there s
On Sat, Feb 11, 2006 at 03:38:56PM +0900, JINMEI Tatuya / [EMAIL
PROTECTED]@C#:H wrote:
> > On Fri, 10 Feb 2006 22:50:25 -0500,
> > Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
> >> Sorry, not really (we've not got a test environment to reproduce it).
> >> But from a quick review of nd6.c,
> On Fri, 10 Feb 2006 22:50:25 -0500,
> Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>> Sorry, not really (we've not got a test environment to reproduce it).
>> But from a quick review of nd6.c, there seems to be one thing that is
>> obviously wrong. The possible bug has been there since rev.
On Tue, Feb 07, 2006 at 07:16:09PM +0900, JINMEI Tatuya / [EMAIL
PROTECTED]@C#:H wrote:
> > On Tue, 7 Feb 2006 00:45:02 -0500,
> > Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
> >> I ran ntpdate on an amd64 system with ipv6 enabled and a skewed clock
> >> (ntpdate stepped it back by about a
> On Tue, 7 Feb 2006 00:45:02 -0500,
> Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>> I ran ntpdate on an amd64 system with ipv6 enabled and a skewed clock
>> (ntpdate stepped it back by about an hour), and immediately got a
>> use-after-free panic in ifaddr. When I rebooted with memguard en
On Sun, Jan 15, 2006 at 07:44:38PM -0500, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> I ran ntpdate on an amd64 system with ipv6 enabled and a skewed clock
> (ntpdate stepped it back by about an hour), and immediately got a
> use-after-free panic in ifaddr. When I rebooted with memguard enabled
> on this malloc type a
On Mon, Jan 23, 2006 at 02:39:42PM -0500, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 19, 2006 at 02:30:35PM +0900, JINMEI Tatuya / [EMAIL
> PROTECTED]@C#:H wrote:
> > > On Sun, 15 Jan 2006 19:44:38 -0500,
> > > Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> >
> > > I ran ntpdate on an amd64 system wi
On Thu, Jan 19, 2006 at 02:30:35PM +0900, JINMEI Tatuya / [EMAIL
PROTECTED]@C#:H wrote:
> > On Sun, 15 Jan 2006 19:44:38 -0500,
> > Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
> > I ran ntpdate on an amd64 system with ipv6 enabled and a skewed clock
> > (ntpdate stepped it back by about an
> On Sun, 15 Jan 2006 19:44:38 -0500,
> Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> I ran ntpdate on an amd64 system with ipv6 enabled and a skewed clock
> (ntpdate stepped it back by about an hour), and immediately got a
> use-after-free panic in ifaddr. When I rebooted with memguard enab
16 matches
Mail list logo
