On Sat, Feb 11, 2006 at 04:31:23PM +0900, JINMEI Tatuya / [EMAIL PROTECTED]@C#:H wrote: > >>>>> On Sat, 11 Feb 2006 02:14:11 -0500, > >>>>> Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > > >> >> Sorry, not really (we've not got a test environment to reproduce it). > >> >> But from a quick review of nd6.c, there seems to be one thing that is > >> >> obviously wrong. The possible bug has been there since rev. 1.19 > >> >> committed in April 2002. We've been probably just lucky so far... > >> >> > >> >> Could you try the patch attached below? We'll probably also need to > >> >> apply this fix to 4.X and 5.X. > >> > >> > The patch did not fix the panic. > >> > >> Hmm, but this time the point where the panic happened should be > >> different. Can you identify where it was? > > > I reduced the hw.physmem size and was able to get a dump: > > > (kgdb) frame 10 > > > #10 0xffffffff80333a86 in nd6_timer (ignored_arg=0xffffffff8059ab60) at > > ../../../netinet6/nd6.c:585 > > 585 ia6->ia6_flags |= IN6_IFF_DEPRECATED; > > Are you sure you applied the patch? In the 'patched' version of > nd6.c, line 585 is blank, so at least it doesn't match the above > backtrace.
Sorry, you're right - what was happening was that I'd apply the patch, then go to build the kernel and realise the time was still wrong, then run ntpdate and it would panic again, and because of soft updates the patch hadn't been synced yet and it would be gone when I rebooted again. In fact I cannot seem to reproduce the panic with the patch successfully applied. Next I'll test David's patch. Kris
pgpIqr0MdIAm6.pgp
Description: PGP signature
