Hi
i recently had exactly this problem, and it turned out to be the way I'd
connected the machine. It was cured when I connected the uplink cable
directly the the outside interface instead of into the hub. Could this be a
similar situation?
Best Regards
Mike
At 18:45 18/09/2001 -0500, you
TED]>
> > To: Mike Saunders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: RE: kernel arp messages
> >
> > > Sep 18 15:01:54 router /kernel: arp: 209.74.87.1 is on lo0 but got reply
> > > from 00:60:08:35:57:4e on xl0
> >
> > And this is *r
to specify a gateway for each NIC on the next release of
>FreeBSD?
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Anuranjan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>> Sent: Wednesday, September 19, 2001 8:02 AM
>> To: 'Mike Saunders'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Subject: RE: kernel
gt; that're in picture then you could try using different masks.
>
>
>
>
>
>
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Lars Eggert
> > Sent: Tuesday, September 18, 200
Thanks for all the replies gentlemen! I'll try to clear some things up
here:
On Tue, 18 Sep 2001, Lars Eggert wrote:
> Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2001 17:31:24 -0800
> From: Lars Eggert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: Mike Saunders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sub
t; [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Lars Eggert
> Sent: Tuesday, September 18, 2001 6:26 PM
> To: Mike Saunders; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: kernel arp messages
>
>
> > I'm running a 3.4-RELEASE i386 machine with two network cards. The
> > machine acts as a ro
> ifconfig_xl0="inet 209.74.92.209 netmask 255.255.255.0"
> ifconfig_ep0="inet 209.74.87.1 netmask 255.255.255.0"
>
> the netmasks are for the same subnet ... that is the thing that results
in
> the kernel giving out these messages. If it's two different
> networks/subnets
> that're in picture the
7;re in picture then you could try using different masks.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Lars Eggert
Sent: Tuesday, September 18, 2001 6:26 PM
To: Mike Saunders; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: kernel arp messages
> I'm runni
> Sep 18 15:01:54 router /kernel: arp: 209.74.87.1 is on lo0 but got reply
> from 00:60:08:35:57:4e on xl0
And this is *really* ugly! Are you proxy-arping? Someone is advertising
one of your local IP addresses.
Again, I think a picture of your setup would help. It sounds like you're
simply tryin
> I'm running a 3.4-RELEASE i386 machine with two network cards. The
> machine acts as a router between my LAN and my provider's network. ep0
is
> the NIC connected to my LAN and xl0 is my provider's network.
These ARP messages usually occur when people think they must hook two NICs
up to the s
ubject: RE: kernel arp messages
Is it possible to specify a gateway for each NIC on the next release of
FreeBSD?
> -Original Message-
> From: Anuranjan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, September 19, 2001 8:02 AM
> To: 'Mike Saunders'; [EMAIL PROT
Is it possible to specify a gateway for each NIC on the next release of
FreeBSD?
> -Original Message-
> From: Anuranjan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, September 19, 2001 8:02 AM
> To: 'Mike Saunders'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: kernel arp
I recently came across the same prblem myself. You're facing it because of
the same subnet mask on your cards. In freeBSD if you configure two cards
on the same subnet the kernel gets confused as to which card is the gateway
to the router. THe kernel seems to make this decision based on the fact
[Peter Brezny]
> I thought I rememberd someone mentioning a sysctl control for turning off
> the kernel arp messages when you have two nics on the same (misconfigured)
> network, but I couldn't find it in the archives.
>
> Anyone know?
# sysctl -w net.link.ether.inet.log_arp_wrong_iface=0
--
14 matches
Mail list logo
